surface roughness prediction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

185
(FIVE YEARS 44)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 101470
Author(s):  
Lilan Liu ◽  
Xiangyu Zhang ◽  
Xiang Wan ◽  
Shuaichang Zhou ◽  
Zenggui Gao

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yahui Wang ◽  
Lianyu Zheng ◽  
Yiwei Wang ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Fei Tao

Abstract The monitoring of surface quality in machining is of great practical significance for the reliability and life of high-value products such as rocket, spacecraft and aircraft, particularly for their assembly interfaces of these products. Surface roughness is an important metric to evaluate the surface quality. The current research of online surface roughness prediction has the following limitations. The effect of the varying tool wear on the surface roughness is rarely considered in machining. In addition, the deteriorating trend of surface roughness and tool wear is different under variable cutting parameters. Prediction models trained under one set of cutting parameters fail when cutting parameters change. This paper proposes a surface roughness prediction method considering the varying tool wear under variable cutting parameters. A stacked autoencoder and long short-term memory network (SAE-LSTM) is designed as the basic surface roughness prediction model that uses tool wear conditions and sensor signals as the input. The transfer learning strategy is applied on SAE-LSTM such that the surface roughness online prediction under variable cutting parameters can be realized. Machining experiments for the assembly interface (Ti6Al4V material) of the aircraft’s vertical tail are conducted and the monitoring data are used to validate the proposed method. Ablations studies are carried out to evaluate the key modules of the proposed model. The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms other models and well track the true surface roughness over time.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
XueTao Wei ◽  
caixue yue ◽  
DeSheng Hu ◽  
XianLi Liu ◽  
YunPeng Ding ◽  
...  

Abstract The processed surface contour shape is extracted with the finite element simulation software, and the difference value of contour shape change is used as the parameters of balancing surface roughness to construct the infinitesimal element cutting finite element model of supersonic vibration milling in cutting stability domain. The surface roughness trial scheme is designed in the central composite test design method to analyze the surface roughness test result in the response surface methodology. The surface roughness prediction model is established and optimized. Finally, the finite element simulation model and surface roughness prediction model are verified and analyzed through experiment. The research results show that, compared with the experiment results, the maximum error of finite element simulation model and surface roughness prediction model is 30.9% and12.3%, respectively. So, the model in this paper is accurate and will provide the theoretical basis for optimization study of auxiliary milling process of supersonic vibration.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Xianli ◽  
Sun Yanming ◽  
Yue Caixu ◽  
Wei Xudong ◽  
Sun Qingzhen ◽  
...  

Abstract Generally, off-line methods are used for surface roughness prediction of titanium alloy milling. However, studies show that these methods have poor prediction accuracy. In order to resolve this shortcoming, a prediction method based on Cloudera's Distribution Including Apache Hadoop (CDH) platform is proposed in the present study. In this regard, data analysis and process platform is designed based on the CDH, which can upload, calculate and store data in real-time. Then this platform is combined with the Harris hawk optimization (HHO) algorithm and pattern search strategy, and an improved hybrid optimization (IHHO) method is proposed accordingly. Then this method is applied to optimize the SVM algorithm and predict the surface roughness in the CDH platform. The obtained results show that the prediction accuracy of IHHO method reaches 95%, which is higher than the conventional methods of SVM, BAT-SVM, GWO-SVM and WOA-SVM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Manuela Galati ◽  
Giovanni Rizza ◽  
Silvio Defanti ◽  
Lucia Denti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document