The Effects of Using Tranexamic Acid in Tumescent Solution During Rhytidectomy Surgery

Introduction: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is a common adjunct to assist in hemostasis in a wide variety of applications. Although TXA has gained more popularity in facial cosmetic surgery, there are limited studies evaluating the effects of TXA in rhytidectomy patients, especially when used in tumescent solution. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of TXA on surgical time, postoperative ecchymosis, and need for aspiration when used in tumescent solution during cervicofacial rhytidectomy procedures. Materials and Methods: The authors designed a retrospective cohort study from an eligible population of all patients treated with cervicofacial rhytidectomy using tumescent solution at Williamson Cosmetic Center in Baton Rouge, LA, from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. The outcome variables were surgical time, need for postoperative aspiration, and the duration of bruising postoperatively. The primary predictor variable was the use of TXA in the tumescent solution. Statistical analysis was performed using t tests and chi-square analyses. Results: Overall, 70 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 61.4 ± 7.2 years and 90% were female. Forty-five patients were in the TXA group and 25 in the non-TXA group. The use of TXA in tumescent solution was statistically significant for reducing ecchymosis ( p < .001). The majority of patients in the TXA group (60%) had bruising cleared by day 7, whereas the majority of patients in the non-TXA group (52%) had bruising cleared by day 28. There was a statically significant reduction in frequency of postoperative aspiration in the TXA group (8.9% in TXA group vs 40.0% in the non-TXA group, P = .002). The study did not demonstrate a significant difference in surgical time between the two groups. Discussion: Although there is a lack of recognition of the potential benefits of TXA, there has been an increased off-label use by numerous surgical specialties. Routes of administration include topical, oral, intravenous, local infiltrative, and by tumescent anesthesia. Improvements in intraoperative hemostasis and postoperative ecchymosis are some of the main benefits of TXA. Conclusions: Utilizing TXA in tumescent solution in patients undergoing cervicofacial rhytidectomy procedures is associated with an improvement in postoperative ecchymosis duration and a decreased need for postoperative aspiration compared with the non-TXA group.

Complications and Solutions for Post-Operative Liposuction Deformities

In this chapter, the authors will review the complications associated with liposuction and laser liposuction procedures, using published reports as the guide to document these complications and deformities to the readers. In addition, the authors will also report on the use of tumescent anesthesia and the published documentation regarding safety concerns that have been presented via the use of tumescence versus general anesthesia when performing liposuction or laser liposuction. Real-world discussions also will take place in which the authors describe best treatment practices as solutions to those complications described. Liposuction and laser liposuction are wonderful procedures that have been performed for many years. Understanding and being able to identify and treat any untoward complications is extremely important to make everyone a better surgeon and a better physician.

THERMAL AND NON-THERMAL METHODS OF TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY VARICOSЕ DISEASES OF THE LOWER LIMBS OF STAGE C2

Treatment results of primary varicose disorders has been shown. The experience of using of thermal (endovenous laser ablation) and non-thermal methods (endovenous mechanochemical ablation, echo-controlled introduction of bioglue) in treatment of stage C2 chronic venous is shown. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the efficiency of endovenous ablation techniques. The treatment of 58 patients was analyzed. In the group of patients who underwent endovenous laser obliteration, reflux was not detected. In the group of patients with mechanochemical obliteration, reflux was determined in 3 patients (27.2%) at follow-up after 3 months required supplementation with foam sclerobliteration. In the group of patients with the introduction of bio glue, reflux was determined in 1 patient (20%) at the examination after 3 months. The received results lead to conclusion, that endovenous laser coagulation of affected veins is a reliable method of threatment, the gold standard. The advantage of non-thermal methods is the absence of thermal effects on the paravenous structures, respectively, patients have no pain during the procedure, increases comfort, and there is no risk of damage to the paravenous nerves. Another advantage of non-thermal techniques is no need to use of tumescent anesthesia, since only one puncture is required for the operation, which is comfortable for patients. The use of adhesive vein obliteration is justified in patients with signs of a short reflux duration and has an advantage for the patient due to the absence of the need for compression in the postoperative period. Non-thermal methods require further research and widespread implementation in practice.

Choosing the Best Treatment Approach for Axial Vein Reflux: Thermal versus Nonthermal Approaches

Chronic venous insufficiency is a common and treatable medical condition which has a high morbidity if left untreated, progressing to lower extremity edema, skin changes of lipodermatosclerosis, and venous ulceration. Treatment options have significantly expanded over the last several decades, shifting away from the traditional surgical approach to more minimally invasive procedures such as endoluminal venous laser ablation or radiofrequency ablation. Even more recently, several techniques using nonthermal methods to ablate varicose veins have been developed, which offer the advantage of not requiring labor-intensive and painful tumescent anesthesia to protect the surrounding tissues. These techniques include mechanochemical ablation, cyanoacrylate closure, or polidocanol microfoam injection and can be offered to a wider range of patients without the need for sedation while offering similar closure rates and improved postprocedure symptom profile. Furthermore, certain patient characteristics which might preclude or complicate the use of thermal ablation methods might not pose a problem with nonthermal nontumescent methods.

Constant Rate Infusion of Lidocaine, Tumescent Anesthesia and Their Combination in Dogs Undergoing Unilateral Mastectomy

Tumescent anesthesia (TUM) is a technique that was initially used to perform liposuction under local anesthesia, which consists of the injection of such large volumes of local anesthetic until to produce swelling and firmness (tumescence) of the surgical area. The aim of this study was to compare the intraoperative analgesic efficacy of lidocaine (LID) constant rate infusion (CRI), of TUM, or their combination (LID/TUM) and the postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in dogs undergoing unilateral mastectomy. Twenty-four dogs were premedicated with dexmedetomidine (3 μg/kg) and methadone (0.2 mg/kg) intravenously (IV). After induction with propofol IV to effect, dogs were randomly allocated to receive a loading dose of lidocaine (2 mg/kg) followed by a CRI of 100 μg/kg/min (Group LID) in addition to an equivalent volume of lactated Ringer’s solution instead of local TUM; a loading dose of lactated Ringer’s solution followed by a CRI of Ringer’s solution in addition to TUM (Group TUM); a loading dose of lidocaine (2 mg/kg) followed by a CRI of 100 μg/kg/min in addition to TUM (Group LID/TUM). Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Postoperative pain scores were assessed once the dogs had fully recovered from the sedative effects, and following 15, 30, 45 and 60 min. The results of the current study allow us to assert that all three treatments provided satisfactory intraoperative antinociceptive effects but administration of LID/TUM induced greater inhibition on sympathetic stimulating effect up to 60 min from recovery, thus, providing better early postoperative pain relief in dogs undergoing mastectomy.

Use of Tumescent Anesthesia in Surgical Excision of Gynecomastia

Background. Gynecomastia, benign enlargement of the male breast is the most common breast pathology amongst males. The most widely used modality of treatment is liposuction under general anesthesia. To date however there is no published study that specifically addresses to use tumescent anesthesia & use of tranexamic acid in it for excision of gynecomastia. Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of tumescent anesthesia in surgical excision of gynecomastia. Methods. A 4-year study with 100 patients of gynecomastia aged 14 to 47 years were enrolled with follow up for 3 months. All patients were given tumescence anesthesia in each breast comprising subcutaneous infiltration of 500 ml RL, 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 30 ml 2% lignocaine, 1 mg adrenaline & 1 gm tranexamic acid. Breast tissue was excised in each breast by a single infraareolar incision & patients were assessed for intra-op pain and post-op pain by using numeric rating scale (NRS). Results. Bilateral presentation was there in 69 patients and 31 unilateral with 4 recurrent cases. Size of gland excised were 12-14 cms in 53 cases, 15-18 cms in 38 & 19-20 cms in 9 patients. Average surgical time required for each breast was 30 minutes. Intraoperative pain NRS-0 for 66, NRS-1 for 31 & NRS-5 for 03 patients. Postoperative pain for first eight hours was NRS-0 for 69 and NRS-1 for 31 patients. Conclusion. Tumescent anaesthesia for surgical excision of gynecomastia using a periareolar incision is a minimally invasive bloodless and painless technique in which ductal and stromal tissue can be removed resulting in a high level of patient satisfaction. In todays covid era it avoids the use of general anesthesia and electrocautery.