Noninvasive Prenatal Testing of Methylmalonic Acidemia cblC Type Using the cSMART Assay for MMACHC Gene Mutations

Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for monogenic disorders has been developed in recent years; however, there are still significant technical and analytical challenges for clinical use. The clinical feasibility of NIPT for methylmalonic acidemia cblC type (cblC type MMA) was investigated using our circulating single-molecule amplification and re-sequencing technology (cSMART). Trios molecular diagnosis was performed in 29 cblC type MMA-affected children and their parents by traditional Sanger sequencing. In the second pregnancy, invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) of the pathogenic MMACHC gene was used to determine fetal genotypes, and NIPT was performed using a novel MMACHC gene–specific cSMART assay. Maternal–fetal genotypes were deduced based on the mutation ratio in maternal plasma DNA. Concordance of fetal genotypes between IPD and NIPT, and the sensitivity and specificity of NIPT were determined. After removing two cases with a low P value or reads, the concordance ratio for NIPT and IPD was 100.00% (27/27), and the sensitivity and specificity were 100.00% (54.07–100.00%) and 100.00% (83.89–100.00%), respectively. This study demonstrates that NIPT using the cSMART assay for cblC type MMA was accurate in detecting fetal genotypes. cSMART has a potential clinical application as a prenatal diagnosis and screening tool for carrier and low-risk genotypes of cblC type MMA and other monogenic diseases.

Genetic Background of Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the most formidable challenges in present-day antenatal care. Pathological fetal growth is a well-known factor of not only in utero demise in the third trimester, but also postnatal morbidity and unfavorable developmental outcomes, including long-term sequalae such as metabolic diseases, diabetic mellitus or hypertension. In this review, the authors present the current state of knowledge about the genetic disturbances responsible for FGR diagnosis, divided into fetal, placental and maternal causes (including preeclampsia), as well as their impact on prenatal diagnostics, with particular attention on chromosomal microarray (CMA) and noninvasive prenatal testing technique (NIPT).

Reply to: Noninvasive prenatal testing for DiGeorge syndrome: is it ready for clinical practice?

NA

Noninvasive prenatal testing for DiGeorge syndrome: is it ready for clinical practice?

None