pediatric critical care
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1034
(FIVE YEARS 251)

H-INDEX

36
(FIVE YEARS 5)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-shan Tseng ◽  
Ronald Thomas ◽  
Ajit Sarnaik

Abstract Introduction: Physicians use mobile apps for patient care, but few are dedicated to pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM). We developed an easy-to-use customized mobile app for PCCM residents. Our objectives were to evaluate whether this mobile app will improve residents' confidence in PCCM knowledge and comfort level in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).Methods: We recruited 90 residents from March 2020 to April 2021 for this prospective survey-based, block-randomized, single-center study with a pre-post study design. Participants completed 20-question quizzes at the beginning and end of the rotation. T-test was used to compare the pre-post quiz score difference between the two groups of residents (those with and without the app). At the end of the rotation, subjects also completed a survey with 5-point Likert scale items to compare their comfort level in PICU and confidence in PCCM knowledge pre- and post-rotation.Results: There was a significantly increased improvement in the post-block quiz from the pre-block quiz in the mobile app group compared to the control group (an increase of 0.23 questions vs 1.67, p=0.045). There was a trend of increased improvement in confidence in pediatric critical care knowledge for the App group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance by Pearson's Chi-square test (p=0.246). Similarly, there was no statistical difference between the two study groups for change in Comfort Level in PICU from the baseline level.Conclusion: Implementation of a service-specific mobile app may enhance residents' clinical experience and improve self-efficacy. Further investigation is warranted.


BMC Nursing ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Renning ◽  
Brittney van de Water ◽  
Shelley Brandstetter ◽  
Chisomo Kasitomu ◽  
Netsayi Gowero ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Significant improvements in under-five mortality in Malawi have been demonstrated over the past thirty years; however, Malawian healthcare remains with gaps in availability and access to quality pediatric critical care nursing training and education. To improve expertise of pediatric critical care nurses in Malawi, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHeS), Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), and Mercy James Center (MJC) entered a partnership with Seed Global Health, a US non-governmental organization. A needs assessment was conducted to understand the training needs of nurses currently working in pediatric critical care and in preparation for the development of a specialized Master’s in Child Health pathway in Pediatric Critical Care (PCC) Nursing at KUHeS. Methods The needs assessment was completed using a survey questionnaire formatted using an ABCDE (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, and Exposure) framework. The questionnaire had Likert scale and yes/no questions. Data was manually entered into excel and was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results One hundred and fifty-three nurses at QECH and MJC responded to the survey. Most nurses were between the ages of 25 and 35 years (N = 98, 64%), female (N = 105, 69%), and held either a Bachelors (N = 72, 47%) or diploma (N = 70, 46%) in nursing. Nurses had high rates of confidence in certain skills: airway management (N = 120, 99%), breathing assessment & management (N = 153, 100%). However, nurses demonstrated little to no confidence in areas such as: mechanical ventilation (N = 68, 44%), ECG evaluation (N = 74, 48%), and arterial blood gas collection & interpretation (N = 49, 32%). Conclusion It is important to identify priority areas for training and skills development to address in the PCC master’s within the child health pathway at KUHeS. Ideally this partnership will produce practice-ready PCC nurses and will establish a recognized PCC nursing workforce in Malawi.


Author(s):  
Hayley Hutton ◽  
Ahmed Sherif ◽  
Abhijit Ari ◽  
Padmanabhan Ramnarayan ◽  
Andrew Jones

AbstractNon-invasive respiratory support (NRS) including high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is increasingly used for children with respiratory failure requiring interhospital transport by pediatric critical care transport (PCCT) teams. In this retrospective observational study of children receiving NRS on transport between January 1st, 2017 and December 31st, 2019 by a single PCCT service in England, we describe a cohort of children, looking at patient characteristics, journey logistics, adverse events, and failure of NRS (as defined by emergency intubation on transport or within 24 hours of arriving on the pediatric intensive care unit), and to attempt to identify risk factors that were associated with NRS failure. A total of 3,504 patients were transported during the study period. Three hundred and seventeen (9%) received NRS. Median age was 4.9 months (IQR 1.0–18.2); median weight was 5.1 kg (IQR 3.1–13). The primary diagnostic category was cardiorespiratory in 244/317 (77%) patients. Comorbidities were recorded in 189/317 (59.6%) patients. Median Pediatric Index of Mortality-3 (PIM3) score was 0.024 (IQR 0.012–0.045). Median stabilization time was 80 minutes while median patient journey time was 40 minutes. Nineteen adverse events were described (clinical deterioration, equipment failure/interface issues) affecting 6% of transports. The incidence of NRS failure was 6.6%. No risk factors associated with NRS failure were identified. We concluded that NRS can be considered safe during pediatric transport for children with a wide range of diagnoses and varying clinical severity, with a low rate of adverse events and need for intubation on transport or on the PICU.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saad Ghafoor ◽  
Kimberly Fan ◽  
Matteo Di Nardo ◽  
Aimee C. Talleur ◽  
Arun Saini ◽  
...  

IntroductionPediatric patients who undergo hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy are at high risk for complications leading to organ failure and the need for critical care resources. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a supportive modality that is used for cardiac and respiratory failure refractory to conventional therapies. While the use of ECMO is increasing for patients who receive HCT, candidacy for these patients remains controversial. We therefore surveyed pediatric critical care and HCT providers across North America and Europe to evaluate current provider opinions and decision-making and institutional practices regarding ECMO use for patients treated with HCT or CAR-T.MethodsAn electronic twenty-eight question survey was distributed to pediatric critical care and HCT providers practicing in North America (United States and Canada) and Europe through the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network and individual emails. Responses to the survey were recorded in a REDCap® database.ResultsTwo-hundred and ten participants completed the survey. Of these, 159 (76%) identified themselves as pediatric critical care physicians and 47 (22%) as pediatric HCT physicians or oncologists. The majority (99.5%) of survey respondents stated that they would consider patients treated with HCT or CAR-T therapy as candidates for ECMO support. However, pediatric critical care physicians identified more absolute and relative contraindications for ECMO than non-pediatric critical care physicians. While only 0.5% of respondents reported that they consider HCT as an absolute contraindication for ECMO, 6% of respondents stated that ECMO is contraindicated in HCT patients within their institution and only 23% have an institutional protocol or policy to guide the evaluation for ECMO candidacy of these patients. Almost half (49.1%) of respondents would accept a survival to hospital discharge of 20-30% for pediatric HCT patients requiring ECMO as adequate.ConclusionsECMO use for pediatric patients treated with HCT and CAR-T therapy is generally acceptable amongst physicians. However, there are differences in the evaluation and decision-making regarding ECMO candidacy amongst providers across medical specialties and institutions. Therefore, multidisciplinary collaboration is an essential component in establishing practice guidelines and advancing ECMO outcomes for these patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Steffen ◽  
Philip C. Spinella ◽  
Laura M. Holdsworth ◽  
Mackenzie A. Ford ◽  
Grace M. Lee ◽  
...  

Purpose: Risks of red blood cell transfusion may outweigh benefits for many patients in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs). The Transfusion and Anemia eXpertise Initiative (TAXI) recommendations seek to limit unnecessary and potentially harmful transfusions, but use has been variable. We sought to identify barriers and facilitators to using the TAXI recommendations to inform implementation efforts.Materials and Methods: The integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (iPARIHS) framework guided semi-structured interviews conducted in 8 U.S. ICUs; 50 providers in multiple ICU roles completed interviews. Adapted Framework analysis, a form of content analysis, used the iPARIHS innovation, recipient, context and facilitation constructs and subconstructs to categorize data and identify patterns as well as unique informative statements.Results: Providers perceived that the TAXI recommendations would reduce transfusion rates and practice variability, but adoption faced challenges posed by attitudes around transfusion and care in busy and complex units. Development of widespread buy-in and inclusion in implementation, integration into workflow, designating committed champions, and monitoring outcomes data were expected to enhance implementation.Conclusions: Targeted activities to create buy-in, educate, and plan for use are necessary for TAXI implementation. Recognition of contextual challenges posed by the PICU environment and an approach that adjusts for barriers may optimize adoption.


2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Emily Foreman ◽  
Helen Harvey ◽  
Christopher Cannavino

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-536
Author(s):  
Blake Vander Wood ◽  
Rahul Damania ◽  
Chris Armstead ◽  
Kiran Hebbar

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 233-233
Author(s):  
Bhavesh Patel ◽  
Hugues Yver ◽  
Charlotte Woods-Hill ◽  
Michael O. Harhay ◽  
Nadir Yehya

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 247-247
Author(s):  
Kayla Phelps ◽  
Errin Mitchell ◽  
Erin Carlton ◽  
Erica Andrist

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document