MAKNA MEDIASI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

Art. 95(4) Law No. 28 of 2014 re. Copyright determines that mediation should be the preferred choice to settle copyright disputes, including those that relates to piracy and plagiarism. The issue to be discussed here is what would the legal consequence be in case this alternative dispute settlement is not utilized by disputants. This problem will be discussed using a juridical normative approach. Here, mediation is understood in the context of Law No. 30 of 1999 re. Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement and Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 re. Mediation Procedure in Court Proceedings. The main finding of this legal research is that mediation, by law, should be offered in court or may be used out of court at any time by disputants, in civil dispute (claim for compensation) as well in criminal cases. Non utilisation does not have as consequence the cessation of existing court proceedings.

Institutional limitations and possible vectors of the development of mediation in Russia

The object of this research is the socio-legal institution of mediation as an alternative dispute settlement procedure in Russia. The subject of this research is the peculiarities of development of this institution and their substantiation by the specificity of institutional implementation, as well as cultural-historical aspects of the Russian society. The author indicates that the longstanding efforts of enthusiasts with the support of government structures aimed at the development of mediation as a legal institution outside its social component (mediation as an assisting profession) appeared to be ineffective and even faced rejection of a considerable part of society, as its conceptual grounds on the foundation of law do not correspond with the cultural-historical matrix of Russia. Special attention is given to the peculiarities of the establishment of mediation as a social institution and assisting profession. The author concludes on the presence of basic institutional restrictions of the development of socio-legal institution of mediation in Russia, due to the absence of mediation mechanisms of development (according to A. S. Akhiezer). The novelty of this work consist in tracing the dynamics of institutional development of mediation in the context of social evolution of the Russian society. The author believes that successful development of mediation in Russia as a social institution and assisting profession is not only possible, but essential; first and foremost, school mediation combined with remedial practices, as an effective technique of helping families, including families with children, and as instruments for working with ethno-confessional conflicts.

Part IV Procedural and Institutional Aspects, Ch.30 Alternative Dispute Settlement Mechanisms

This chapter examines existing ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (ADR) options—such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, and arbitration—with a view to assessing their efficacy in relation to cultural heritage disputes. Indeed, even a cursory consideration of the practice reveals that the vast majority of restitution claims arising in the past few decades have been settled through such means. Admittedly, this is due to the fact that ADR procedures combine important virtues. The first advantage of ADR resides in the parties’ power to tailor the settlement process according to their interests and the circumstances of the dispute. Second, private settlement is likely to be speedier and cheaper. Third, these mechanisms provide for flexibility and creativity. Fourth, since disputes are resolved out of the public eye, extra-curial resolution ensures confidentiality. Lastly, ADR entails neutrality and fairness.

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN DOKTER DAN MODEL PENYELESAIAN PERKARA MALPRAKTIK MEDIK DI INDONESIA

There is an international tendency to divert medical dispute from the litigation model (in court settlement) to the out-of-court dispute models (out of court settlement) which leads to the win-win situation of the paradigm. This paradigm has actually started to be adopted in Indonesia only the implementation is still not encouraging. Law Number 36 Year 2009 on Health (Health Law) provides that disputes arising out of negligence of health personnel must be resolved through mediation (Article 29). This provision has not fully become the reference of the public and law enforcement officers related to the settlement of medical disputes in Indonesia. The tendency of patients in Indonesia to prosecute doctors through legal channels is still quite high. This is further exacerbated by the attitude of law enforcement officers who seem less concerned with the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 36 Year 2009 on Health above. The application of mediation means in the dispute of medical disputes as required by article 29 of the Health Law faces a number of obstacles in the field. One of the obstacles is the lack of implementing regulations that explain how such mediation mechanisms should technically be run. There are a number of laws and regulations governing mediation such as Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts and Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Settlement. Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2008 regulates the court-annexed mediation while Law Number 30 Year 1999 regulates the arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) institutions. In addition, there are also some institutions that perform mediation functions such as: Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), Ombudsman, and Badan Pengawas Rumah (RSB). All such institutions are deemed relevant for the settlement of medical disputes. It is thus quite confusing at the operational level.

PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PENGGUNA JASA KEUANGAN NON BANK DALAM PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN (CONTOH KASUS: PERUSAHAAN PEMBIAYAAN PT ADIRA FINANCE VS KONSUMEN)

At present, consumers can easily have a vehicle with various waivers such as loans with 0% interest, free administration fees, installments with a small down payment and so forth. However, this causes problems, especially when consumers cant continue installment payments which lead to the forced withdrawal of collateral. The problem that the writer raises is how is the responsibility of non-bank financial service business actors in the example of a financing agreement in PT Adira Finance, what is the form of legal protection for consumers of non-bank financial service users if there’s a loss? What legal remedies can consumers of non-bank financial service users do if there’s a loss? The author examines cases with normative research methods. The data obtained by the author is that the finance company may not withdraw collateral without a confiscation letter and the third party who seized the collateral must not be arbitrary, must first obtain a certificate from the Professional Certification Institute. Consumers, as stated in the financing agreement of PT Adira Finance, can only settle disputes either by deliberation and consensus or if they are not able to successfully settle in a district court in the creditor's office area or outside the court through the Alternative Dispute Settlement Institution (LAPS) that has been established by OJK. According to the UUPK, the responsibility that can be given by business actors to the detriment of consumers in this case is compensation for money / goods / services worth the price

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG LISENSI HAK CIPTA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA (Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/HKI.Hak Cipta/2014/ PN Niaga Jo Putusan M.A Nomor: 80 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2016)

<p>Abstract<br />This article is aims to determine theregulation of law protection for the copyright licensee and to know the form of legal protection for the copyright licensee in the case of Copyright dispute between PT. Inter Sport Marketing against PT. Bhavana Andalan Klating and Alila Villa Soori (Study of Decision Number: 09 / HKI.HAK CIPTA / 2014 / PN Niaga Jo Decision of M.A Number: 80 K / Pdt.Sus-Hki / 2016). This research is normative legaland applied using a statute approach and case approach.Legal materials source used include the primary and secondary legal materials that using literature as a technique of collecting legal material. Technical analysis is the method of deductive syllogism.Based on the research result and the session generated the conclusion which is,first point,The legal protection for the copyright licensee holder can be a preventive effort by recording the copyright license contained in the provisions of Article 83 of the Copyright Act and repressive efforts through alternative dispute settlement, arbitration or by court contained in the provisions of Article 95 of the Copyright Act. The second conclusion is PT. Inter Sport Marketing gets the legal protection for its rights through repressive efforts with filing a lawsuit in the Commercial Court and receives compensation.<br />Keywords : Legal Protection, Licencing, Copyrights</p><p> </p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang lisensi hak cipta dan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang lisensi hak cipta dalam kasus perselisihan Hak Cipta antara PT. Inter Sport Marketing melawan PT. Bhavana Andalan Klating dan Alila Villa Soori (Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/HKI.HAK CIPTA/2014/ PN Niaga Jo Putusan M.A Nomor: 80 K/Pdt. Sus-Hki/2016). Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang menggunakan metode studi pustaka sebagai pengumpulan bahan hukum. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah metode deduksi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dihasilkan kesimpulan, yakni kesatu perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang lisensi hak cipta dapat berupa upaya preventif dengan pencatatan lisensi hak cipta yang terdapat dalam ketentuan Pasal 83 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan upaya represif melalui alternatif penyelesaian sengketa, arbitrase atau melalui pengadilan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan Pasal 95 Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Kesimpulan kedua,yaitu PT. Inter Sport Marketing mendapatkan perlindungan hukum atas haknya melalui upaya represif dengan pengajuan gugatan di Pengadilan Niaga dan mendapatkan ganti kerugian. <br />Kata Kunci : Perlindungan Hukum, Lisensi, Hak Cipta</p>

PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN PERUSAHAAN EFEK YANG MELAKUKAN PEMBELIAN SAHAM KORPORASI TERBUKA YANG DINYATAKAN MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to determine about legal protection for consumers of securities companies that purchase shares of public listed company that committed acts of corruption. This article using a normative prespective<br />legal research with statue approach. Legal materials that used include primary and secondary legal material obtained by data collection techniques based on literature study with analysis techniques with deductive logic, explain a general thing then drawing it into more specific conclusions. The result of this study explains that there is a legal protection in the form of efforts that can be done by the investors as explained in the Chapter VI Article 28 through Article 30 of Law Number 21 of 2011 on Financial Services Authority (FSA) and also through the predetermined Internal Dispute (IDR) mechanism by FSA. If the mechanism unsuccessfully, then they can do an alternative dispute resolution through an Alternative Dispute Settlement Institution in the Financial Services Sector as regulated in POJK Number 1 / POJK.07 / 2013. As a customer, it is expected to find out more about their rights and obligations in the capital market sector before deciding to invest their funds through a securities company. FSA also needs to provide more education regarding the rights and obligations of financial service businesses and financial service consumers. In addition, it is expected that the FSA can have a greater role related to the protection of consumers and society.<br />Keywords: Protaction; Securities Companies; Consumers of Securities Companies.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tentang perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen perusahaan efek yang melakukan pembelian saham korporasi terbuka yang dinyatakan melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat prespektif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach). Jenis data yang digunakan berupa data primer dan sekunder yang diperoleh dengan teknik pengumpulan data berdasarkan studi kepustakaan dengan teknik analisis data dengan logika deduktif, yaitu menjelaskan suatu hal yang bersifat umum kemudian menariknya menjadi kesimpulan yang lebih khusus. Hasil dari kajian ini adalah adanya perlindungan hukum berupa upaya yang dapat dilakukan oleh konsumen sebagaimana dijelaskan pada Bab VI Pasal 28 sampai dengan Pasal 30 Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan juga melalui mekanisme Standar Internal Dispute (IDR) yang telah ditentukan oleh OJK. Jika melalui mekanisme tersebut belum menemui titik terang maka dapat melakukan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Sektor Jasa Keuangan sebagaimana diatur dalam POJK Nomor 1/ POJK.07/2013. Sebagai nasabah diharapkan untuk lebih mencari tahu kembali terkait hak-hak dan kewajibannya selaku nasabah di sektor pasar modal sebelum memutuskan untuk menginvestasikan dananya melalui perusahaan efek. OJK juga perlu memberikan edukasi lebih terkait hak dan kewajiban baik pelaku usaha jasa keuangan dan konsumen jasa keuangan, selain itu OJK diharapkan dapat memiliki peranan yang lebih besar lagi terkait dengan perlindungan konsumen dan masyarakat.<br />Kata kunci: Perlindungan; Perusahaan Efek; Konsumen Perusahaan Efek.</p>