Combination Therapy Versus Monotherapy In The Treatment Of Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia Infections: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Background: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug-resistant bacteria that is difficult to treat in hospitals around the world. It has become a public health issue, as well as being linked to a high mortality rate. Several studies have shown a variety of treatment and clinical outcomes; however, the efficacy of combination therapy remains limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of monotherapy and combination therapy for S. maltophilia infections on mortality outcome.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of combination therapy versus monotherapy in the treatment of S. maltophilia infections on mortality as a clinical outcome. Electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, and OpenGrey, were systematically searched from the inception of the database until September 3, 2021. Results: Of which 6,524 articles identified, a total of 13 studies and 2 cohort studies were included for systematic review of combination therapy and meta-analysis, respectively. The systematic review of combination antimicrobial therapy had been showed clinically desirable outcome on mortality in S. maltopholia infection, especially in complex or severe infection. In the fixed-effects meta-analysis of the cohort study, monotherapy was surprisingly shown to have statistically significant effects on the decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.94). Conclusions: Our results found that the combination antimicrobial therapy had been showed clinically desirable outcome on mortality in S. maltopholia infection and monotherapy has a trend toward improved better outcome than combination therapy on mortality for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections. A longitudinal study that further explores this association is warranted. Trial registration: This study was registered with the trial registration number ID: 210843 under the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO: www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Phenotypic and Molecular Characteristics of the MDR Efflux Pump Gene-Carrying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Strains Isolated in Warsaw, Poland

An increase of nosocomial infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains has recently been observed all over the world. The isolation of these bacteria from the blood is of particular concern. In this study we performed the phenotypic and genotypic characterization of 94 S. maltophilia isolates, including isolates from patients hospitalized in a tertiary Warsaw hospital (n = 79) and from outpatients (n = 15). All isolates were found to be susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and minocycline, while 44/94 isolates demonstrated a reduction in susceptibility to levofloxacin. A large genetic variation was observed among the isolates tested by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. A clonal relationship with 100% similarity was observed between isolates within two sub-pulsotypes: the first included nine bloodstream isolates and the second involved six. Multilocus sequence typing showed two new sequence types (ST498 and ST499) deposited in public databases for molecular typing. Moreover, the presence of genes encoding ten different efflux pumps from the resistance-nodulation-division family and the ATP-binding cassette family was shown in the majority of the 94 isolates. The obtained knowledge about the prevalence of efflux pump genes in clinical S. maltophilia strains makes it possible to predict the scale of the risk of resistance emergence in strains as a result of gene overexpression.

Indigenous Lipase Producing Bacteria for Lipid-rich Wastewater Treatment

This study was undertaken to evaluate the removal of lipid-rich organic matter from wastewater by lipase producing bacteria. Ten potential lipase producing bacteria were isolated from lipid-rich environments in and around Dhaka Metropolitan city. Three of them produced lipase higher than 10 U/ml. These three isolates and their consortium were used for synthetic wastewater treatment in the laboratory. The initial COD value of synthetic wastewater was 1,200 mg/l. COD removal efficiencies in the synthetic wastewater were 74.75, 73.33 and 66.67% by the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia e-a22, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 12 and Bacillus subtilis 20B, respectively. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia showed better COD removal performance (74.75%) in case of monoculture. But consortium showed better COD removal (83.33%) than that of monoculture. Therefore, it could be concluded that consortium of three isolates will be more useful for wastewater treatment as seed cultures in the wastewater treatment plant associated with the lipid-rich wastewater. Plant Tissue Cult. & Biotech. 31(2): 135-142, 2021 (December)

In vitro Time Kill of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli using Cation Adjusted Muller Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) is considered the treatment of choice for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , but limited pharmacodynamic data are available to support current susceptibility breakpoints or guide optimal dosing. Time-kill studies using a TMP/SMZ concentration of 4/40 μg/mL were conducted to compare 4 S. maltophilia with 4 Escherichia coli having the same MICs (0.25/4.75-4/76 μg/mL) in cation adjusted Mueller Hinton Broth (CAMHB) and ISO-Sensitest™ broth (ISO). With the exception of the resistant isolates (4/76 μg/mL), which resulted in regrowth approaching control, TMP/SMZ displayed significantly greater killing for E. coli compared with S. maltophilia at each MIC. Against E. coli , mean changes at 24 hour were -4.49, -1.73, -1.59, and +1.83 log 10 colony forming units (CFU) for isolates with MICs of 0.25/4.75, 1/19, 2/39, and 4/74 μg/mL, respectively. The f AUC/MIC required for stasis, 1-log 10 , and 2-log 10 CFU reductions were 40.7, 59.5, and 86.3, respectively. In contrast, TMP/SMZ displayed no stasis or CFU reductions against any S. maltophilia regardless of MIC, and no pharmacodynamic thresholds were quantifiable. Observations were consistent in both CAMHB and ISO broth. These data add increasing evidence that current TMP/SMZ susceptibility breakpoints against S. maltophilia should be reassessed.

The Antibiotic Fosfomycin Mimics the Effects of the Intermediate Metabolites Phosphoenolpyruvate and Glyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate on the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Transcriptome

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an opportunistic pathogen with an environmental origin, which presents a characteristically low susceptibility to antibiotics and is capable of acquiring increased levels of resistance to antimicrobials. Among these, fosfomycin resistance seems particularly intriguing; resistance to this antibiotic is generally due to the activity of fosfomycin-inactivating enzymes, or to defects in the expression or the activity of fosfomycin transporters. In contrast, we previously described that the cause of fosfomycin resistance in S. maltophilia was the inactivation of enzymes belonging to its central carbon metabolism. To go one step further, here we studied the effects of fosfomycin on the transcriptome of S. maltophilia compared to those of phosphoenolpyruvate—its structural homolog—and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate—an intermediate metabolite of the mutated route in fosfomycin-resistant mutants—. Our results show that transcriptomic changes present a large degree of overlap, including the activation of the cell-wall-stress stimulon. These results indicate that fosfomycin activity and resistance are interlinked with bacterial metabolism. Furthermore, we found that the studied compounds inhibit the expression of the smeYZ efflux pump, which confers intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides. This is the first description of efflux pump inhibitors that can be used as antibiotic adjuvants to counteract antibiotic resistance in S. maltophilia.

Subtractive genomics and molecular docking approach to identify drug targets against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a multidrug resistant pathogen associated with high mortality and morbidity in patients having compromised immunity. The efflux systems of S. maltophilia include SmeABC and SmeDEF proteins, which assist in acquisition of multiple-drug-resistance. In this study, proteome based mapping was utilized to find out the potential drug targets for S. maltophilia strain k279a. Various tools of computational biology were applied to remove the human-specific homologous and pathogen-specific paralogous sequences from the bacterial proteome. The CD-HIT analysis selected 4315 proteins from total proteome count of 4365 proteins. Geptop identified 407 essential proteins, while the BlastP revealed approximately 85 non-homologous proteins in the human genome. Moreover, metabolic pathway and subcellular location analysis were performed for essential bacterial genes, to describe their role in various cellular processes. Only two essential proteins (Acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein]—UDP-N acetyl glucosamine O-acyltransferase and D-alanine-D-alanine ligase) as candidate for potent targets were found in proteome of the pathogen, in order to design new drugs. An online tool, Swiss model was employed to model the 3D structures of both target proteins. A library of 5000 phytochemicals was docked against those proteins through the molecular operating environment (MOE). That resulted in to eight inhibitors for both proteins i.e. enterodiol, aloin, ononin and rhinacanthinF for the Acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein]—UDP-N acetyl glucosamine O-acyltransferase, and rhazin, alkannin beta, aloesin and ancistrocladine for the D-alanine-D-alanine ligase. Finally the ADMET was done through ADMETsar. This study supported the development of natural as well as cost-effective drugs against S. maltophilia. These inhibitors displayed the effective binding interactions and safe drug profiles. However, further in vivo and in vitro validation experiment might be performed to check their drug effectiveness, biocompatibility and their role as effective inhibitors.

Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. A previous guidance document focused on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Here, guidance is provided for treating AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (AmpC-E), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Methods A panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections formulated questions about the treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections. Answers are presented as suggestions and corresponding rationales. In contrast to guidance in the previous document, published data on optimal treatment of AmpC-E, CRAB, and S. maltophilia infections are limited. As such, guidance in this document is provided as “suggested approaches” based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States. Results Preferred and alternative treatment suggestions are provided, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Suggestions apply for both adult and pediatric populations. Conclusions The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of September 17, 2021 and will be updated annually. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance-2.0/.