Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents (ESAS) in Supportive Care of Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Recamds Registry FINAL Results

Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) are the frontline treatment in low-risk anemic MDS patients and an employment of this therapy in the earlier stage of the disease can delay the need for RBC transfusion, hypothetically by slowing the disease course. It's matter of debate whether the clinical response is a result of proliferation and maturation of the dysplastic clone or stimulation of residual normal erythropoiesis by ESAs. Macrocytosis is one of the cytological hallmarks of dyserithropoiesis in MDS: an analysis of the erythropoietic response to ESAs therapy in a cohort of anemic non trasfusion-dependent MDS patients, enrolled in a retrospective register, RECAMDS, subgroup of Italian register, was performed. 183 patients, treated with standard-dose ESAs, have been retrospectively analyzed. Data analysis was performed, according to IWG 2006 criteria, at the baseline, after 3 and 6 months of continuous treatment, with a subanalysis of the patients according to WHO and R-IPSS risk stratification. ESAs were started at mean Hb concentration of 9.31 g/dl, mean serum EPO concentration: 51 mU/L, after a mean time from diagnosis of 6 months (r.1-118). ORR was 83.6% (153/183), no difference among WHO and IPSS subgroups was found: 132/183 (72.1%) achieved response after 3 months of treatment, while other 21/183 (11.2%) after 6 months. 19 patients with stable disease (non-responders, according to IWG criteria), in which treatment was continued, achieved response after 9 months. In the macrocytic-responders group 83.2% exhibits again macrocytosis after 3 months, while 16.8% become normocytic. In the normocytic-responders group 89.8% exhibits again normocytosis, while 10.2% become macrocytic: in these patients, after 3 months, there was a contemporary worsening in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with transfusion-dependence, regarded as first signs of progression of disease. Non-responders were 30/183 (16.3%): in the macrocytic non-responders group 89% exhibit again macrocytosis after 3 months, while 11% become normocytic; in the normocytic group 76% exhibits again macrocytosis, while 24% become normocytic. These preliminary data can suggest that, in the majority of MDS patients responsive to ESAs, the increase of Hb concentration occurs mainly stimulating erythroid production in MDS clones; in the minority of patients probably it happens recruiting residual polyclonal erythropoiesis. It is interesting to note that stimulating effects of ESAs last even when the expression of dysplasia progresses. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Martinelli: Roche: Consultancy; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene /BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Daichii Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Role of circulating endothelial progenitors in responsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients

Background Though treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients has been improved remarkably by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA), hypo-responsiveness to ESA poses a persistent problem in a subgroup of CKD patients, especially those on dialysis, with deteriorated mortality or cardiovascular risks. Pathomechanism of this condition including cardiovascular implications has not been sufficiently investigated. Methods Clinical parameters of 101 chronic hemodialysis patients which included those hospitalized in our university hospital were examined cross-sectionally. As a marker estimating ESA hypo-responsiveness, erythropoietin resistance index (ERI) was calculated. Numbers of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) were measured by flow cytometry. Associations among values were analyzed by methods including multiple linear regression. Results Majority (93%) of the subjects were hospitalized patients with various comorbidities. ERI (18.4 [7.2–33.0] IU/week/kg/g/dL) and ESA dose (161.6 [75.0–320.9] IU/week/kg) of all the subjects were relatively high. Factors negatively correlated with EPC included age, HD vintage, CRP, pulse rate, ESA dose and ERI, while male sex and systolic blood pressure were positively correlated. By multiple linear regression analysis, age, sex and ERI (standardized coefficient beta − 0.202, p = 0.039) remained as the independently predicting factors of EPC (log CD133/Flk1+ EPC). Darbepoetin alpha was used in 65 patients, especially predominant when requiring higher ESA doses, but by correlation or multivariable analyses, this did not substantially modify the negative association between ERI and EPC. Conclusions ERI was independently associated with EPC paucity in a cohort with various comorbidities. This may suggest a link which connects ESA hypo-responsiveness to compromised cardiovascular prognosis of dialysis patients.

Molidustat for Renal Anemia in Nondialysis Patients Previously Treated with Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are the current standard of care for anemia due to chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients not undergoing dialysis. Molidustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated as an alternative treatment for renal anemia. Molidustat was evaluated in five phase 3 studies, the molidustat once daily improves renal anemia by inducing erythropoietin (MIYABI) program. The present study investigated the safety and efficacy of molidustat in Japanese patients with renal anemia not undergoing dialysis and previously treated with ESAs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a 52-week, active-controlled, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, phase 3 study in Japanese patients with anemia due to CKD (stages 3–5). Molidustat was initiated at 25 mg or 50 mg once daily according to previous ESA dose. The ESA darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin) was initiated at a starting dose in accordance with the previous ESA dose and injected subcutaneously once every 2 or 4 weeks. Doses were regularly titrated to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the target range of 11.0–13.0 g/dL. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean Hb level and its change from baseline during the evaluation period (weeks 30–36). The safety outcomes included evaluation of all adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 164 patients were randomized to receive molidustat (<i>n</i> = 82) or darbepoetin (<i>n</i> = 82). Baseline characteristics were well balanced. Mean (standard deviation) Hb levels at baseline were 11.31 (0.68) g/dL for molidustat and 11.27 (0.64) g/dL for darbepoetin. The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) for mean Hb levels during the evaluation period for molidustat (11.67 [11.48–11.85] g/dL) and darbepoetin (11.53 [11.31–11.74] g/dL) was within the target range. Based on a noninferiority margin of 1.0 g/dL, molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin regarding the change in mean Hb level during the evaluation period from baseline, with a least squares mean (95% CI) difference (molidustat-darbepoetin) of 0.13 (−0.15, 0.40) g/dL. The proportion of patients who reported at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was 92.7% for molidustat and 96.3% for darbepoetin. TEAEs leading to death were reported in 2 patients (2.4%) in the molidustat group and none in the darbepoetin group; serious TEAEs were reported in 32.9% and 26.8% of patients, respectively. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Molidustat was noninferior to darbepoetin and maintained Hb levels in the prespecified target range in patients with renal anemia not undergoing dialysis and previously treated with ESA. Molidustat was well tolerated, and no new safety signal was observed.

Uptake of evidence by physicians: De-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents after the TREAT trial

Background Variation in de-adoption of ineffective or unsafe treatments is not well-understood. We examined de-adoption of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anemia treatment among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) following new clinical evidence of harm and ineffectiveness (the TREAT trial) and the FDA’s revision of its safety warning. Method We used a segmented regression approach to estimate changes in use of epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DPO) in the commercial, Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) populations. We also examined how changes in both trends and levels of use were associated with physicians’ characteristics. Results Use of DPO and EPO declined over the study period. There were no consistent changes in DPO trend across insurance groups, but the level of DPO use decreased right after the FDA revision in all groups. The decline in EPO use trend was faster after the TREAT trial for all groups. Nephrologists were largely more responsive to evidence than primary care physicians. Differences by physician’s gender, and age were not consistent across insurance populations and types of ESA. Conclusions Physician specialty has a dominant role in prescribing decision, and that specializations with higher use of treatment (nephrologists) were more responsive to new evidence of unsafety and ineffectiveness.