Characterization of subcellular localization of eukaryotic clamp loader/unloader and its regulatory mechanism

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) plays a critical role as a processivity clamp for eukaryotic DNA polymerases and a binding platform for many DNA replication and repair proteins. The enzymatic activities of PCNA loading and unloading have been studied extensively in vitro. However, the subcellular locations of PCNA loaders, replication complex C (RFC) and CTF18-RFC-like-complex (RLC), and PCNA unloader ATAD5-RLC remain elusive, and the role of their subunits RFC2-5 is unknown. Here we used protein fractionation to determine the subcellular localization of RFC and RLCs and affinity purification to find molecular requirements for the newly defined location. All RFC/RLC proteins were detected in the nuclease-resistant pellet fraction. RFC1 and ATAD5 were not detected in the non-ionic detergent-soluble and nuclease-susceptible chromatin fractions, independent of cell cycle or exogenous DNA damage. We found that small RFC proteins contribute to maintaining protein levels of the RFC/RLCs. RFC1, ATAD5, and RFC4 co-immunoprecipitated with lamina-associated polypeptide 2 (LAP2) α which regulates intranuclear lamin A/C. LAP2α knockout consistently reduced detection of RFC/RLCs in the pellet fraction, while marginally affecting total protein levels. Our findings strongly suggest that PCNA-mediated DNA transaction occurs through regulatory machinery associated with nuclear structures, such as the nuclear matrix.

Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 clamp by inserting DNA from the top of a wide-open ring, opposite the mechanism of RFC/PCNA

ABSTRACTIn response to DNA damage, the ring-shaped 9-1-1 clamp is loaded onto 5’ recessed DNA to arrest the cell cycle and activate the DNA damage checkpoint. The 9-1-1 clamp is a heterotrimeric ring that is loaded in S. cerevisiae by Rad24-RFC, an alternative clamp loader in which Rad24 replaces the Rfc1 subunit in the RFC1-5 clamp loader of PCNA. Unlike RFC that loads the PCNA ring onto a 3’-ss/ds DNA junction, Rad24-RFC loads the 9-1-1 ring onto a 5’-ss/ds DNA junction, a consequence of DNA damage. The underlying 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism has been a mystery. Here we report two 3.2-Å cryo-EM structures of Rad24-RFC bound to DNA and either a closed or 27 Å open 9-1-1 clamp. The structures reveal a completely unexpected mechanism by which a clamp can be loaded onto DNA. The Rad24 subunit specifically recognizes the 5’-DNA junction and holds ds DNA outside the clamp loader and above the plane of the 9-1-1 ring, rather than holding DNA inside and below the clamp as in RFC. The 3’ ssDNA overhang is required to obtain the structure, and thus confers a second DNA binding site. The bipartite DNA binding by Rad24-RFC suggests that ssDNA may be flipped into the open 9-1-1 ring, similar to ORC-Cdc6 that loads the Mcm2-7 ring on DNA. We propose that entry of ssDNA through the 9-1-1 ring triggers the ATP hydrolysis and release of the Rad24-RFC. The key DNA binding residues are conserved in higher eukaryotes, and thus the 9-1-1 clamp loading mechanism likely generalizes.

Cryo-EM structures reveal high-resolution mechanism of a DNA polymerase sliding clamp loader

Sliding clamps are ring-shaped protein complexes that are integral to the DNA replication machinery of all life. Sliding clamps are opened and installed onto DNA by clamp loader AAA+ ATPase complexes. However, how a clamp loader opens and closes the sliding clamp around DNA is still unknown. Here, we describe structures of the S. cerevisiae clamp loader Replication Factor C (RFC) bound to its cognate sliding clamp Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA) en route to successful loading. RFC first binds to PCNA in a dynamic, closed conformation that blocks both ATPase activity and DNA binding. RFC then opens the PCNA ring through a large-scale 'crab-claw' expansion of both RFC and PCNA that explains how RFC prefers initial binding of PCNA over DNA. Next, the open RFC:PCNA complex binds DNA and interrogates the primer-template junction using a surprising base-flipping mechanism. Our structures indicate that initial PCNA opening and subsequent closure around DNA do not require ATP hydrolysis, but are driven by binding energy. ATP hydrolysis, which is necessary for RFC release, is triggered by interactions with both PCNA and DNA, explaining RFC's switch-like ATPase activity. Our work reveals how a AAA+ machine undergoes dramatic conformational changes for achieving binding preference and substrate remodeling.

Mechanisms of loading and release of the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp

5' single-stranded/double-stranded DNA serve as loading sites for the checkpoint clamp, 9-1-1, which mediates activation of the apical checkpoint kinase, ATRMec1. However, the basis for 9-1-1's recruitment to 5' junctions is unclear. Here, we present structures of the yeast checkpoint clamp loader, Rad24-RFC, in complex with 9-1-1 and a 5' junction and in a post-ATP-hydrolysis state. Unexpectedly, 9-1-1 adopts both closed and planar open states in the presence of Rad24-RFC and DNA. Moreover, Rad24-RFC associates with the DNA junction in the opposite orientation of processivity clamp loaders with Rad24 exclusively coordinating the double-stranded region. ATP hydrolysis stimulates conformational changes in Rad24-RFC, leading to disengagement of DNA-loaded 9-1-1. Together, these structures explain 9-1-1's recruitment to 5' junctions and reveal new principles of sliding clamp loading.

Genetic analysis of DinG-family helicase YoaA and its interaction with replication clamp-loader protein HolC in E. coli

The XP-D/DinG family of DNA helicases contributes to genomic stability in all three domains of life. We investigate here the role of one of these proteins, YoaA, of Escherichia coli . In E. coli , YoaA aids tolerance to the nucleoside azidothymidine (AZT), a DNA replication inhibitor and physically interacts with a subunit of the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, HolC. We map the residues of YoaA required for HolC interaction to its C-terminus by yeast two-hybrid analysis. We propose that this interaction competes with HolC’s interaction with HolD and the rest of the replisome; YoaA indeed inhibits growth when overexpressed, dependent on this interaction region. By gene fusions we show YoaA is repressed by LexA and induced in response to DNA damage as part of the SOS response. Induction of YoaA by AZT is biphasic with an immediate response after treatment and a slower response that peaks in the late log phase of growth. This growth-phase dependent induction by AZT is not blocked by lexA3 (Ind - ), which normally negates its self-cleavage, implying another means to induce the DNA damage response that responds to the nutritional state of the cell. We propose that YoaA helicase activity increases access to the 3’ nascent strand during replication; consistent with this, YoaA appears to aid removal of potential A-to-T transversion mutations in ndk mutants, which are prone to nucleotide misincorporation. We provide evidence that YoaA and its paralog DinG also may initiate template-switching that leads to deletions between tandem repeats in DNA. IMPORTANCE Maintaining genomic stability is crucial for all living organisms. Replication of DNA frequently encounters barriers that must be removed to complete genome duplication. Balancing DNA synthesis with its repair is critical and not entirely understood at a mechanistic level. The YoaA protein, studied here, is required for certain types of DNA repair and interacts in an alternative manner with proteins that catalyze DNA replication. YoaA is part of the well-studied LexA-regulated response to DNA damage, the SOS response. We describe an unusual feature of its regulation that promotes induction after DNA damage as the culture begins to experience starvation. Replication fork repair integrates both DNA damage and nutritional signals. We also show that YoaA affects genomic stability.

DNA polymerase III protein, HolC, helps resolve replication/transcription conflicts

In Escherichia coli, DNA replication is catalyzed by an assembly of proteins, the DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. This complex includes the polymerase and proofreading subunits, the processivity clamp and clamp loader complex. The holC gene encodes an accessory protein (known as χ) to the core clamp loader complex and is the only protein of the holoenzyme that binds to single-strand DNA binding protein, SSB. HolC is not essential for viability although mutants show growth impairment, genetic instability and sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. In this study we isolate spontaneous suppressor mutants in a holC∆ strain and identify these by whole genome sequencing. Some suppressors are alleles of RNA polymerase, suggesting that transcription is problematic for holC mutant strains, and of sspA, stringent starvation protein. Using a conditional holC plasmid, we examine factors affecting transcription elongation and termination for synergistic or suppressive effects on holC mutant phenotypes. Alleles of RpoA (α), RpoB (β) and RpoC (β’) RNA polymerase holoenzyme can partially suppress loss of HolC. In contrast, mutations in transcription factors DksA and NusA enhanced the inviability of holC mutants. HolC mutants showed enhanced sensitivity to bicyclomycin, a specific inhibitor of Rho-dependent termination. Bicyclomycin also reverses suppression of holC by rpoA, rpoC and sspA. An inversion of the highly expressed rrnA operon exacerbates the growth defects of holC mutants. We propose that transcription complexes block replication in holC mutants and Rho-dependent transcriptional termination and DksA function are particularly important to sustain viability and chromosome integrity.

Allosteric communication in DNA polymerase clamp loaders relies on a critical hydrogen-bonded junction

Clamp loaders are AAA+ ATPases that load sliding clamps onto DNA. We mapped the mutational sensitivity of the T4 bacteriophage sliding clamp and clamp loader by deep mutagenesis, and found that residues not involved in catalysis or binding display remarkable tolerance to mutation. An exception is a glutamine residue in the AAA+ module (Gln 118) that is not located at a catalytic or interfacial site. Gln 118 forms a hydrogen-bonded junction in a helical unit that we term the central coupler, because it connects the catalytic centers to DNA and the sliding clamp. A suppressor mutation indicates that hydrogen bonding in the junction is important, and molecular dynamics simulations reveal that it maintains rigidity in the central coupler. The glutamine-mediated junction is preserved in diverse AAA+ ATPases, suggesting that a connected network of hydrogen bonds that links ATP molecules is an essential aspect of allosteric communication in these proteins.

The Pif1 helicase is actively inhibited during meiotic recombination which restrains gene conversion tract length

Meiotic recombination ensures proper chromosome segregation to form viable gametes and results in gene conversions events between homologs. Conversion tracts are shorter in meiosis than in mitotically dividing cells. This results at least in part from the binding of a complex, containing the Mer3 helicase and the MutLβ heterodimer, to meiotic recombination intermediates. The molecular actors inhibited by this complex are elusive. The Pif1 DNA helicase is known to stimulate DNA polymerase delta (Pol δ) -mediated DNA synthesis from D-loops, allowing long synthesis required for break-induced replication. We show that Pif1 is also recruited genome wide to meiotic DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites. We further show that Pif1, through its interaction with PCNA, is required for the long gene conversions observed in the absence of MutLβ recruitment to recombination sites. In vivo, Mer3 interacts with the PCNA clamp loader RFC, and in vitro, Mer3-MutLβ ensemble inhibits Pif1-stimulated D-loop extension by Pol δ and RFC-PCNA. Mechanistically, our results suggest that Mer3-MutLβ may compete with Pif1 for binding to RFC-PCNA. Taken together, our data show that Pif1’s activity that promotes meiotic DNA repair synthesis is restrained by the Mer3-MutLβ ensemble which in turn prevents long gene conversion tracts and possibly associated mutagenesis.

Modeling DNA trapping of anticancer therapeutic targets using missense mutations identifies dominant synthetic lethal interactions

Genetic screens can identify synthetic lethal (SL) interactions and uncover potential anticancer therapeutic targets. However, most SL screens have utilized knockout or knockdown approaches that do not accurately mimic chemical inhibition of a target protein. Here, we test whether missense mutations can be utilized as a model for a type of protein inhibition that creates a dominant gain-of-function cytotoxicity. We expressed missense mutations in the FEN1 endonuclease and the replication-associated helicase, CHL1, that inhibited enzymatic activity but retained substrate binding, and found that these mutations elicited a dominant SL phenotype consistent with the generation of cytotoxic protein–DNA or protein–protein intermediates. Genetic screens with nuclease-defective hFEN1 and helicase-deficient yCHL1 captured dominant SL interactions, in which ectopic expression of the mutant form, in the presence of the wild-type form, caused SL in specific mutant backgrounds. Expression of nuclease-defective hFEN1 in yeast elicited DNA binding-dependent dominant SL with homologous recombination mutants. In contrast, dominant SL interactions with helicase-deficient yCHL1 were observed in spindle-associated, Ctf18-alternative replication factor C (Ctf18-RFC) clamp loader complex, and cohesin mutant backgrounds. These results highlight the different mechanisms underlying SL interactions that occur in the presence of an inhibited form of the target protein and point to the utility of modeling trapping mutations in pursuit of more clinically relevant SL interactions.