The Two-years Immune Effect Between 0-1-2-months and 0-1-6-months of HBV Vaccination Schedule in Adults

Background: The short-term 0-1-2-months hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination schedule was previously proposed in the adult population; however, its long-term immune effect remains unclear. The present study was aimed to investigate 1) the 2-months and 2-year immune effect of HBV vaccination; and 2) compliance rate between 0-1-2-months and 0-1-6-months vaccination schedules in adults.Method: A total of 1281 subjects tested for HBsAg(-) and Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)(-) were recruited. Participants from two distant counties were inoculated hepatitis B yeast vaccine for 10ug per dose each time, with 0-1-2-months (n=606) and 0-1-6-months (n=675) vaccination schedule, sequentially followed-up at two months and two years after the 3rd injection.Results: There was no statistical difference in anti-HBs seroconversion rate between 0-1-2-months and 0-1-6-months vaccination schedule at two months (91.96% vs 89.42%, p=0.229) and two years (81.06% vs. 77.14%, p=0.217). Quantitative anti-HBs level of 0-1-2-months vaccination schedule was not different with 0-1-6-months vaccination schedule at 2 months (anti-HBs1) (342.12 ± 378.42 m IU/ml vs. 392.38 ± 391.96 m IU/ml, p=0.062), but was higher at two years (anti-HBs2) (198.37 ± 286.44 m IU /ml vs. 155.65 ± 271.73 m IU /ml, p=0.048). By subgroup analysis, 0-1-2-months vaccination schedule showed better maintenance (p=0.041) and delayed reinforcement (p=0.019) in comparison to 0-1-6 vaccination schedule. The 0-1-2-months vaccination schedule also increased the 3rd-time injection completion rate (89.49% vs. 84.49%, p=0.010).Conclusion: the 0-1-2-months vaccination could obtain a similar short-term immune effect, but achieve a better long-term immune memory and a higher completion rate in the adult population.Trial registration: None

Irradiation-Induced Changes in the Immunogenicity of Lung Cancer Cell Lines: Based on Comparison of X-rays and Carbon Ions

Increasing the immunogenicity of tumors is considered to be an effective means to improve the synergistic immune effect of radiotherapy. Carbon ions have become ideal radiation for combined immunotherapy due to their particular radiobiological advantages. However, the difference in time and dose of immunogenic changes induced by Carbon ions and X-rays has not yet been fully clarified. To further explore the immunogenicity differences between carbon ions and X-rays induced by radiation in different “time windows” and “dose windows.” In this study, we used principal component analysis (PCA) to screen out the marker genes from the single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) of CD8+ T cells and constructed a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Also, ELISA was used to test the exposure levels of HMGB1, IL-10, and TGF-β under different “time windows” and “dose windows” of irradiation with X-rays and carbon ions for A549, H520, and Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cell lines. The results demonstrated that different marker genes were involved in different processes of immune effect. HMGB1 was significantly enriched in the activated state, while the immunosuppressive factors TGF-β and IL-10 were mainly enriched in the non-functional state. Both X-rays and Carbon ions promoted the exposure of HMGB1, IL-10, and TGF-β in a time-dependent manner. X-rays but not Carbon ions increased the HMGB1 exposure level in a dose-dependent manner. Besides, compared with X-rays, carbon ions increased the exposure of HMGB1 while relatively reduced the exposure levels of immunosuppressive factors IL-10 and TGF-β. Therefore, we speculate that Carbon ions may be more advantageous than conventional X-rays in inducing immune effects.

In vitro and in vivo analyses of co-infections with peste des petits ruminants and capripox vaccine strains

Background Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) and goat pox (GTP) are two devastating animal epidemic diseases that affect small ruminants. Vaccination is one of the most important measures to prevent and control these two severe infectious diseases. Methods In this study, we vaccinated sheep with PPR and POX vaccines to compare the changes in the antibody levels between animals vaccinated with PPRV and POX vaccines alone and those co-infected with both vaccines simultaneously. The cell infection model was used to explore the interference mechanism between the vaccines in vitro. The antibody levels were detected with the commercial ELISA kit. The Real-time Quantitative PCR fluorescent quantitative PCR method was employed to detect the viral load changes and cytokines expression after the infection. Results The concurrent immunization of GTP and PPR vaccine enhanced the PPR vaccine's immune effect but inhibited the immune effect of the GTP vaccine. After the infection, GTP and PPR vaccine strains caused cytopathic effect; co-infection with GTP and PPR vaccine strains inhibited the replication of PPR vaccine strains; co-infection with GTP and PPR vaccine strains enhanced the replication of GTP vaccine strains. Moreover, virus mixed infection enhanced the mRNA expressions of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, and IFN-β by 2–170 times. GTP vaccine strains infection alone can enhanced the mRNA expression of IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, while the expression of IFN-α mRNA is inhibited. PPR vaccine strains alone can enhanced the mRNA expression of IFN-α, IFN-β, TNF-α, and has little effect the mRNA expression of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10. The results showed that GTP and PPR vaccine used simultaneously in sheep enhanced the PPR vaccine's immune effect but inhibited the immune effect of the GTP vaccine in vivo. Furthermore, an infection of GTP and PPR vaccine strains caused significant cell lesions in vitro; co-infection with GTP + PPR vaccine strains inhibited the replication of PPR vaccine strains, while the co-infection of GTP followed by PPR infection enhanced the replication of GTP vaccine strains. Moreover, virus infection enhanced the expressions of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-α, and IFN-β. Conclusions Peste des petits ruminants and capripox vaccine strains interfere with each other in vivo and vitro.