adiabatic conditions
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

129
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1133
Author(s):  
Sungjae Moon ◽  
Frank Rosenblum ◽  
Yuehua Tan ◽  
Kristian E. Waters ◽  
James A. Finch

Previous work has shown that sulphide self-heating occurs in three distinct stages, referred to as Stage A, Stage B and Stage C. In this publication, the focus is the transition from Stage A to Stage B which occurs at ca. 100 °C. Background literature hints that the transition corresponds to the transformation of the rhombic form of elemental sulphur to the more reactive monoclinic form that occurs at 96 °C. A test apparatus is modified for adiabatic heating to track the transition. The results support this transformation of sulphur as being key to the transition, and the transition temperature is thus modified to 96 °C. Variations in a sample’s response under adiabatic conditions are observed and possible reasons are discussed. Testing in adiabatic mode provides new insights into the sulphide self-heating process that complements the test designed to identify propensity to self-heat.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyang Maw Lim ◽  
Sina Kazemi Bakhshmand ◽  
Clemens Biet ◽  
Mihai Mihaescu

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 2827-2840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxing Ren ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
Xiaoxia Li ◽  
Li Guo

Overall scenarios first revealed clearly by ReaxFF MD for self-heating, similar product distributions and altered kinetics in the three-stage decomposition of CL-20 and its cocrystals under adiabatic conditions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Kang Hu ◽  
Jin-Ming Cui ◽  
Alan C. Santos ◽  
Yun-Feng Huang ◽  
Chuan-Feng Li ◽  
...  

AbstractValidity conditions for the adiabatic approximation are useful tools to understand and predict the quantum dynamics. Remarkably, the resonance phenomenon in oscillating quantum systems has challenged the adiabatic theorem. In this scenario, inconsistencies in the application of quantitative adiabatic conditions have led to a sequence of new approaches for adiabaticity. Here, by adopting a different strategy, we introduce a validation mechanism for the adiabatic approximation by driving the quantum system to a non-inertial reference frame. More specifically, we begin by considering several relevant adiabatic approximation conditions previously derived and show that all of them fail by introducing a suitable oscillating Hamiltonian for a single quantum bit (qubit). Then, by evaluating the adiabatic condition in a rotated non-inertial frame, we show that all of these conditions, including the standard adiabatic condition, can correctly describe the adiabatic dynamics in the original frame, either far from resonance or at a resonant point. Moreover, we prove that this validation mechanism can be extended for general multi-particle quantum systems, establishing the conditions for the equivalence of the adiabatic behavior as described in inertial or non-inertial frames. In order to experimentally investigate our method, we consider a hyperfine qubit through a single trapped Ytterbium ion 171Yb+, where the ion hyperfine energy levels are used as degrees of freedom of a two-level system. By monitoring the quantum evolution, we explicitly show the consistency of the adiabatic conditions in the non-inertial frame.


2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 217-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ze Dong ◽  
Bei-Bei Xue ◽  
Li-ping Chen ◽  
Wang-hua Chen
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document