302 Impact of right ventricular pacing in patients with TAVI underwent permanent pacemaker implantation: the Pace-TAVI International Multicentre Study

Aims Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a relevant issue, being more frequent than after surgery and the progressive shift towards low-risk patients stressed the importance to reduce the risk of complications that could impact patient’s long-term prognosis. Long-term right ventricular pacing has been related to an increased risk of electromechanical asynchrony, negative left-ventricular remodelling, atrial fibrillation and heart failure, but there is a lack of evidence regarding the prognostic impact on TAVI patients. The aim of this international multicentre study is to assess the impact of right ventricular pacing on prognosis of TAVI patients undergone pacemaker implantation after the procedure due to conduction disorders. Methods and results All the consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVI and subsequently underwent pacemaker implantation in each participating centre were enrolled. Patients were divided into two subgroups according to the percentage of ventricular pacing (VP cut-off: 40%) at pacemaker interrogation. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in subgroups based on the percentage of ventricular stimulation. All cause and cardiovascular mortality in the subgroups according to the percentage of ventricular pacing were the secondary endpoints. In total, 427 patients were enrolled, 153 patients with VP < 40% and 274 with a with VP ≥ 40%. Patients with VP ≥ 40% were older (81.16 ± 6.4 years vs. 80.51 ± 6.8 years), with higher NYHA class, a lower EF (55.26 ± 12.2 vs. 57.99 ± 11.3 P = 0.03), an increased end diastolic ventricular volume (112.11 ± 47.6 vs. 96.60 ± 40.4, P = 0.005) and diameter (48.89 ± 9.7 vs. 45.84 ± 7.5 P = 0.01). A higher incidence of moderate post-procedural paravalvular leak was observed in patients with VP ≥ 40% (37.5% vs. 26.85%, P = 0.03). Ventricular pacing ≥40% was associated with a higher incidence of the composite primary endpoint of CV mortality and HF hospitalization (p at log rank test = 0.006, adjusted HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.03–5.6; P = 0.04). Patients with ventricular pacing ≥ 40% had also a higher risk of all-cause (p at log rank test = 0.03, adjusted HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.03–2.38; P = 0.03) and cardiovascular (p at log ank test =0.008, adjusted HR: 3.77; CI: 1.32–10.78; P = 0.006) mortality compared to patients with a VP < 40%. Conclusions TAVI Patients underwent permanent pacemaker implantation after the procedure due to conduction disorders and with a VP ≥ 40% at follow-up are at increased risk of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalizations and of all-cause mortality compared to patients with a VP < 40%. It is mandatory to reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing at follow-up when possible or consider left ventricular branch pacing and biventricular pacing in TAVI patients.

607 Comparison of incidence and predictors of new left bundle branch block and permanent pacemaker implantation in a large multicentre contemporary TAVI registry using the Evolut R/pro system vs. the accurate neo valve

Aims Conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) continue to be an important issue in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and clinical outcomes of new left bundle branch block (LBBB) and PPI after TAVI in a comparison between two self-expandable supra-annular transcatheter valves. Methods and results We report the data from an international, retrospective registry including 3862 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI with two self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (Medtronic Evolut R/PRO and Boston ACURATE neo). Patients with pre-existing left or right bundle branch block, any atrioventricular blocks or previous pacemaker implantation were excluded. Finally, we performed a propensity score matched analysis (PSM) to match the patients and overcome pre-procedural differences reaching 427 couples. New-onset Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB) occurred with a rate of 13.1% (56/427) in the ACURATE group and 18.7% (80/427) in the Evolut group (P = 0.031). The incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation was 16.4% (70/427) in the Evolut group and 6.8% (29/427) in the ACURATE group, respectively (P < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, we found the valve recapture [odds ratio (OR): 4.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08–23.75, P = 0.042] as significant predictors for LBBB, and male sex (OR: 1.59, CI: 1.03–2.46, P = 0.036), ACURATE valve (OR: 0.34, CI: 0.20–0.57, P < 0.001) and post-procedure LBBB (OR: 4.38, CI: 2.78–6.85, P < 0.001) for PPI. Conclusions In our large multi-centre contemporary cohort of patients, new LBBB and PPI occurred more frequently in patients following TAVI with Evolut R/PRO vs. ACURATE valve. However, the choice of the valve seemed to influence only the rate of pacemaker implantation and not the incidence of new LBBB. Further data is required to clarify the impact of valve design on conduction abnormalities.

Incidence of carditis and predictors of pacemaker implantation in patients hospitalized with Lyme disease

Background Lyme carditis, defined as direct infection of cardiac tissue by Borrelia bacteria, affects up to 10% of patients with Lyme disease. The most frequently reported clinical manifestation of Lyme carditis is cardiac conduction system disease. The goal of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients hospitalized with Lyme disease. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient sample was performed to identify patients hospitalized with Lyme disease in the US between 2003 and 2014. Patients with Lyme carditis were defined as those hospitalized with Lyme disease who also had cardiac conduction disease, acute myocarditis, or acute pericarditis. Patients who already had pacemaker implants at the time of hospitalization (N = 310) were excluded from the Lyme carditis subgroup. The primary study outcome was permanent pacemaker implantation. Secondary outcomes included temporary cardiac pacing, permanent pacemaker implant, and in-hospital mortality. Results Of the 96,140 patients hospitalized with Lyme disease during the study period, 10,465 (11%) presented with Lyme carditis. Cardiac conduction system disease was present in 9,729 (93%) of patients with Lyme carditis. Permanent pacemaker implantation was performed in 1,033 patients (1% of all Lyme hospitalizations and 11% of patients with Lyme carditis-associated conduction system disease). Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation included older age (OR: 1.06 per 1 year; 95% CI:1.05–1.07; P<0.001), complete heart block (OR: 21.5; 95% CI: 12.9–35.7; P<0.001), and sinoatrial node dysfunction (OR: 16.8; 95% CI: 8.7–32.6; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality rate was higher in patients with Lyme carditis (1.5%) than in patients without Lyme carditis (0.5%). Conclusions Approximately 11% of patients hospitalized with Lyme disease present with carditis, primarily in the form of cardiac conduction system disease. In this 12-year study, 1% of all hospitalized patients and 11% of those with Lyme-associated cardiac conduction system disease underwent permanent pacemaker implantation.