Versatility of the Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap: Emphasis on Powering Up the Toe Transfer

Background: Reverse-flow posterior interosseous artery (rPIA) flap is an excellent tool for restoration of defects in the hand and upper extremity, sparing the main arteries to the hand. Its reliability has been well established. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one cases of rPIA flap involving 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were age, sex, etiology, size and location of the defect, flap size, number of perforators included, pedicle length, flap inset, donor site coverage, complications, and ancillary procedures. Results: This study included 44 men and 5 women, ranging in age between 10 and 73 years. The subjects had soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremity mainly due to traumatic injuries, including scar contractures of the first web space in 18 cases, thumb amputations in 6 cases, and congenital defects in 1 case. Among the 51 rPIA flap elevations, 3 cases involved flap failure due to the absence of proper pedicle. A fasciocutaneous pattern was observed in 45 cases and a myocutaneous pattern in 3 cases. In 5 cases of unplantable thumb amputations, the rPIA flap was performed for arterial inflow to the secondary toe-to-thumb transfer. Venous congestion of varying degrees was noted in 7 cases involving partial necrosis in 2 cases. During the mean 17 months of follow-up, patients were generally satisfied with the final outcomes. Conclusion: The rPIA flap can be used not only for soft tissue coverage of the hand and upper extremity but also as a recipient arterial pedicle for a secondary toe-to thumb transfer.

The posterior interosseous artery flap versus the adipofascial radial artery perforator flap in reconstruction of firecracker and homemade bomb blast injuries of the hand

Background: The soft tissues of the radial aspect of the hand are predominantly affected in firecracker and homemade bomb blast injuries. In such cases, regional flap options are quite appealing for defect coverage. We have compared the outcomes of using two pedicled regional forearm flaps in these injuries, the posterior interosseous artery flap (PIAF) and the adipofascial radial artery perforator flap (ARAPF).Methods: 37 patients underwent reconstruction of the hand with PIAF (20 cases) and ARAPF (17 cases) between January 2014 and December 2019. They were compared with regards to patient demographics, reconstruction techniques, short-term and long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and the subjective satisfaction score (SSS).Results: All our flaps survived without any major complications affecting long-term outcome. We found no statistically significant difference between the two flaps in terms of patient demographics, flap paddle size, duration of hospital stay, DASH score and SSS for recipient site. However, significant difference was noted in the duration of surgery, method of donor site closure and SSS for the donor site.Conclusions: Both the PIAF and ARAPF can be considered in cases of soft tissue defects of the hand from firecracker or bomb blast injuries. Both preserve the major arteries of the hand while still having reliable vascular pedicle.