Lower limbs lengthening over the intramedullary nail versus lengthening by Ilizarov technique

Introduction. Lengthening over the nail (LON) combines the advantages of external and internal fixations.The objective was to compare the effectiveness of the application, to assess the structure and frequency of complications in patients treated with lengthening by Ilizarov technique and lengthening over the nail.Methods and materials. We analyzed 55 LON cases and 64 cases lengthening by Ilizarov technique. The duration of the external fixation period, complications and quality of the patient life were compared.Results. The external fixation period in LON group was 4 times less than in the Ilizarov technique group. There were 25 complications (45.5 %) in LON group and 54 complications (84.4 %) in the Ilizarov technique group. Femur lengthening was associated with a greater number of complications in both groups. Pin infections were 2.5 times less frequently in the femur LON group. Knee contractures were only in Ilizarov technique group (11.4 %). Ankle joint contracture was noted with the same frequency during tibial lengthening in both groups. Disorders of the consolidation were 2 times more often in the femur LON group and 5 times more often in the tibial lengthening with Ilizarov technique. Premature fusion was observed only in the LON group. There were 2 times less fractures of the half-pins and wires in the LON group.Conclusions. A reduction of external fixation period in LON group correlates with the 2-fold decrease of complications and an increase of the treatment comfort. LON is promising for wider clinical applications.

Staged correction of varus knee and lateral thrust in an achondroplastic (ACH) juvenile patient who underwent limb lengthening with IM nails: tips for proper timing and prioritisation of procedures

We present the case of a fifteen-year-old achondroplastic (ACH) woman who requested to have her femurs lengthened by intramedullary nails. She had undergone bilateral tibial lengthening at the age of eleven and presented with a varus deformity of the right lower limb, lateral thrust of the right knee and valgus deformity of the left lower limb. We performed deformity analyses based on mechanical axis measurements, and we came with a staged surgical plan. In ACH adolescences, correction of bony deformity needs to encounter continuous fibula growth dynamics. Lateral knee thrust was corrected by gradual distal translation of the fibula head via an Ilizarov frame and the amount of translation we decided clinically. Tibial lengthening and valgus osteotomy of the distal femur accentuate lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex laxity. In patients with ACH, tibial lengthening and valgus osteotomy of the distal femur—if needed—should precede LCL complex tightening, and femoral lengthening should follow.

Simultaneous Bilateral Femoral and Tibial Lengthening in Achondroplasia

Previous studies on lengthening for achondroplasia have reported bilateral extensive femoral lengthening followed by bilateral extensive tibial lengthening. To decrease trauma on soft tissues and joints, we propose bilateral simultaneous moderate femoral lengthening and moderate tibial lengthening followed by a similar repeat lengthening a few years later. Fifty patients with achondroplasia underwent 65 simultaneous bilateral femoral and tibial lengthening procedures. Segment lengthening amount and adverse events were obtained from medical records. Mean follow-up after bone healing was 35.6 months. Mean tibial lengthening was 52 mm; mean femoral lengthening was 72 mm. Average healing index was 1.4 months/cm for the tibia and 1 month/cm for the femur. Mean duration of treatment with external fixation was 6.7 months (range, 4.4–10.5 months). Thirty-eight (76%) of 50 patients experienced one or more adverse events during lengthening. We observed 78 adverse events, 35 (45%) of which required additional surgical procedures. All resolved by the end of treatment. Mechanical axis deviation improved from a mean of 15 mm medially to 8 mm medially. Simultaneous lengthening of four segments in patients with achondroplasia is a feasible strategy. Compared with isolated femoral or tibial lengthening, distributing the lengthening between the femur and tibia decreases total external fixator time.

Tibial lengthening in achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 years as the first stage of growth correction

Background Height increase and improvement of body proportions for achondroplasia patients normally require two or more stages of reconstructive treatment to be followed by rehabilitation between lengthening periods, and growth correction can take a significant part of life in the cohort of patients. What is the best age to start growth correction is an important question. The purpose of this paper was to present an argument for arranging the first stage of growth correction in achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 years based on the structural and functional muscle evaluation of tibiae to be lengthened. Material and methods Achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 years (n = 30) were examined preoperatively, during distraction, fixation and at 1.5 to 2 years of frame removal. Tibial lengthening was produced monofocally and bifocally. Contractile force of the dorsal and plantar flexion muscles of the foot was measured with dynamometer. Ultrasonography of tibial muscles was performed with HITACHI ultrasound imaging device (Japan). Results Achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 year who underwent tibial lengthening of at least 50% of the initial length developed neuropathy in 2.6 % of cases and soft tissue inflammation in 5.6 % of cases. Characteristic muscle striation of m. tibialis anterior and m. extensor digitorum longus appeared to restore at 1.5 to 2 years of tibial lengthening with clear contouring of the intermuscular septa and retained contractile force of the muscles. The contractile force restored to 96.15 % of preoperative level in the anterior tibial muscles, and to 101.92 % in the posterior muscles. Conclusion The comprehensive clinical, ultrasonographic and dynamometric evaluation of tibial muscles presented a good argument for tibial lengthening in achondroplasia patients aged 6–9 years. Regained muscle striation and spare capacity of m. tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum longus, the restored force of the anterior tibial muscles to 96.15 % of the preoperative level suggested the possibility for the next stage of growth correction.

Limb lengthening in the treatment of posteromedial bowing of the tibia

Purpose Posteromedial bowing of the tibia is an uncommon but recognized congenital lower extremity deformity in children that can lead to limb length discrepancy (LLD) and residual angulatory deformity. The purpose of this study is to report a series of children at a single institution with posteromedial bowing treated by lengthening. Methods A retrospective review was carried out at our institution identifying 16 patients who were treated with limb lengthening for posteromedial bowing of the tibia and followed to skeletal maturity. Projected LLD was a mean of 7.7 cm (range 5.0 cm to 14.2 cm). Three patients were treated in a staged fashion with lengthening and deformity correction at age three to four years and subsequent definitive tibial lengthening. The remaining 13 patients were treated with limb lengthening approaching adolescence using circular external fixation. Results All patients were pain free and ambulated without a limp at final follow-up. The mean final LLD was 0.3 cm short. In spite of correction of distal tibial shaft valgus in 11 of the 16 patients, eight of the 16 (50%) required later correction of persistent, symptomatic ankle valgus by either hemiepiphyseodesis (seven patients) or osteotomy (one patient). Conclusions Children with posteromedial bowing of the tibial with projected LLD over 5cm can be effectively treated with lengthening. Patients with severe valgus of more than 30° of shaft valgus and difficulty ambulating at age three years can be successfully treated with a two-stage lengthening procedure. Attention should be paid in patients with posteromedial bowing to ankle valgus. Level of Evidence IV