incomplete character sums
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 1653-1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Treviño

The Burgess inequality is the best upper bound we have for incomplete character sums of Dirichlet characters. In 2006, Booker gave an explicit estimate for quadratic Dirichlet characters which he used to calculate the class number of a 32-digit discriminant. McGown used an explicit estimate to show that there are no norm-Euclidean Galois cubic fields with discriminant greater than 10140. Both of their explicit estimates are on restricted ranges. In this paper, we prove an explicit estimate that works for any range. We also improve McGown's estimates in a slightly narrower range, getting explicit estimates for characters of any order. We apply the estimates to the question of how large must a prime p be to ensure that there is a kth power non-residue less than p1/6.


2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1195-1211 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fu ◽  
D. Wan

2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. D. Cohen ◽  
H. Niederreiter ◽  
I. E. Shparlinski ◽  
M. Zieve

1987 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. H. Chalk

AbstractLet x denote a primitive character to a prime-power modulus k = pα. The expected estimatefor the incomplete character sum has been established for r = 1 and 2 by D. A. Burgess and recently, he settled the case r = 3 for all primes p < 3, (cf. [2] for the proof and for references). Here, a short proof of the main inequality (Theorem 2) which leads to this result is presented; the argument being based upon my characterization in [3] of the solution-set of a related congruence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document