Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test with Modified Mallampati Score in Predicting Difficult Intubation

Background and Aims: Identifying a patient with a difficult airway is important in planning anaesthetic management so that endotracheal intubation can be achieved safely. This study aims to compare modified Mallampati score with Upper Lip Bite Test to predict difficult intubation using intubation difficulty scale. Materials and methods: A prospective study was carried on 104 patients, both sexes aged between 18 to 60 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patient airway was evaluated by MMT and ULBT preoperatively. Predictors of difficult endotracheal intubation were assigned to MMT class III and IV, ULBT class III. After premedication and induction laryngoscopy was performed. After successful intubation Intubation difficulty score was noted down based on the sum of seven assessing parameters. A score >5 was considered difficult intubation. Results: The incidence of difficult intubation in the study was 10.6% (i.e. 11 out of 104 patients). In this study ULBT had a higher sensitivity (90.9% v/s 18.20%), specificity (95.7% v/s 75.3%) PPV (71.4% v/s 8%) and NPV (98.9% v/s 88.6%) than that of MMT Conclusion: Upper lip bite test is better at predicting difficult intubation with higher accuracy when compared to Modified Mallampati test. Both the tests are good predictors of easy intubation. Keywords: Upper Lip Bite Test (ULBT), Modified Mallampati test (MMT), Intubation Difficulty scale (IDS), airway assessment. Difficult intubation prediction, Difficult airway

Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Children with Torticollis: Randomized Controlled Trial

We investigated the efficacy of the McGrath videolaryngoscope compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis. Thirty children aged 1–10 years who underwent surgical release of torticollis were randomly assigned into the McGrath and Macintosh groups. Orotracheal intubation was performed by a skilled anesthesiologist. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The Cormack–Lehane grade, lifting force, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), difficulty level, and intubation failure rate were also assessed. The intubation time was significantly longer in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (31.4 ± 6.7 s vs. 26.1 ± 5.4 s, p = 0.025). Additionally, the Cormack–Lehane grades were comparable between the groups (p = 0.101). The lifting force and IDS were significantly lower in the McGrath group than in the Macintosh group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.022, respectively). No significant differences were observed with respect to endotracheal intubation difficulty and intubation success rate. Intubation-related complications were also not observed. In conclusion, compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope, the McGrath videolaryngoscope extended the intubation time and did not improve glottic visualization in children with torticollis, despite having a lesser lifting force, lower intubation difficulty scale, and similar success rate.

Comparative Evaluation of Difficult Intubation Predictors in Children Under Two Years of Ages

Background: Tracheal intubation is the most reliable way of securing an airway. Pediatric airway management is one of the significant challenges, especially for non-pediatric anesthesiologists. Early airway evaluation for detecting difficult intubation and preventing catastrophic events is necessary before anesthesia, especially in children. Objectives: Therefore, this study was done to compare some valuable adult predictors in children under two years of age. Methods: This prospective descriptive-analytical study was performed on 405 children under two years of age that were referred for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in Imam Hossein Hospital, Isfahan. Under sedation in a supine position, we measured items, including age, weight, height, stern omental distance (SMD), mouth opening (MO), neck circumference (NC), acromio-axillo-suprasternal notch index (AASI), and intubation difficulty scale score (IDS). An expert anesthesiologist did laryngoscopy and intubation, and difficult cases were recorded. Results: Our study showed that the frequency of difficult intubation with IDS > 4 was %16, and with IDS > 5 was %3. The variables, including age, weight, height, and SMD, significantly predicted difficult intubation. The cut-off points for age < 6 months, weight < 5/9 kg, height < 61 cm, and SMD < 5/3 cm were obtained, respectively. Other variables, such as MO, AASI, NC, and sex, were unreliable predictors for difficult intubation. Conclusions: We found that IDS > 4, age< 6-month, weight < 5/9 kg, and SMD < 5/3 cm are predictors for difficult intubation. It is helpful for the anesthesiologist to measure these predictions before anesthesia is started to find who has difficult intubation.

Time to intubation with McGrath™ videolaryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope in powered air-purifying respirator: a randomised controlled trial

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple guidelines have recommended the videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation. However, there is no evidence that videolaryngoscope reduces time to tracheal intubation, which is important for COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. Methods: To simulate intubation of COVID-19 patients, we randomised 28 elective surgical patients to be intubated with either the McGrath™ MAC videolaryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope by specialist anaesthetists donning 3M™ Jupiter™ powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR) and N95 masks. Primary outcome was time to intubation. Results: The median (IQR) times to intubation were 61s (37–63 s) and 41.5s (37–56 s) in the videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope groups respectively (p = 0.35). The closest mean (SD) distances between the anaesthetist and the patient during intubation were 21.6 cm (4.8 cm) and 17.6 cm (5.3 cm) in the videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope groups, respectively (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in the median intubation difficulty scale scores, proportion of successful intubation at first laryngoscopic attempt and proportion of intubations requiring adjuncts. Intubations for all the patients were successful with no adverse event. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the time to intubation by specialist anaesthetists who were donned in PAPR and N95 masks on elective surgical patients with either the McGrath™ videolaryngoscope or direct laryngoscope. The distance between the anaesthetist and patient was significantly further with the videolaryngoscope. The direct laryngoscope could be an equal alternative to videolaryngoscope for specialist anaesthetists when resources are limited or disrupted due to the pandemic.

Is there an optimal place to hold the endotracheal tube during direct laryngoscopy for patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia? Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background Endotracheal intubation by direct laryngoscopy is a widely performed lifesaving technique. Although there are guidelines for optimal size and depth of insertion of an endotracheal tube (ETT) for successful intubation, there is no consensus on the point at which it should be held along its length. This will arguably affect the time, ease, and success of the technique due to a difference in visualization and torque applied to the ETT after glottic visualization. We aim to compare the effect of 2 different sites of holding the ETT on time to intubation (TTI), intubation difficulty scale (IDS), and complications. Methods ASA 1–2 patients (>18 years) posted for surgery under general anesthesia, undergoing supervised intubation by anesthesia trainees (experience < 18 months), will be included. Patients with an anticipated difficult airway or unanticipated difficulty—CL grade 3 or 4 requiring the use of airway adjuncts—will be excluded. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated number list, and allocation concealed with opaque sealed envelopes. The two sites for holding the ETT will be group 1 at 19 cm and group 2 at 24 cm. ETT marked at the selected site will be handed by the technician once the optimum position of the table, patient, and laryngoscopic view is confirmed by the intubator. The entire procedure will be video recorded. Two blinded assessors will independently review the videos to document the time to intubation and intubation difficulty score. A postoperative sore throat will be recorded. Sample size To detect a 20% difference in time to intubation between groups with a significance level of 5% and power of 85%, we will need a total of 298 patients. Accounting for data loss, we plan to recruit 180 patients in each group. Discussion This will be the first study to assess whether the site of holding the tube has any impact on the ease and time taken for intubation. The findings of this study will provide scientific evidence for suggesting an appropriate place for holding the ETT during direct laryngoscopy procedures. Trial registration Clinical Trials Registry India CTRI/2019/09/021201

Aerosol box for intubation of patients with suspected COVID-19: simulation study

Introduction. Endotracheal intubation is a procedure associated with a high level of exposure to the COVID-19 virus. This has led to the search of alternatives to reduce the risk of contamination, including the so-called aerosol box. Objective: To compare time and difficulty of orotracheal intubation when using the aerosol box in a simulated setting. Methodology: Observational study conducted with the participation of 33 anesthetist physicians and anesthesia residents; groups were compared in terms of time and intubation difficulty using a conventional Macintosh laryngoscope and the McGRATH™ MAC (Medtronic) videolaryngoscope with or without aerosol box. In order to determine performance with the intubation maneuver, crude hazard ratios were estimated, and a Cox multivariate regression model was built, adjusted by anesthetist years of experience and difficulties during the procedure. Results: On average, the aerosol box increased intubation time by 7.57 seconds (SD 8.33) when the videolaryngoscope was used, and by 6.62 (SD 5.74) with the Macintosh. Overall, 132 intubations were performed, with 121 successful and 6 failed first-time attempts (4 with the use of the aerosol box); 16 participants (48.48%) reported difficulty handling the box. With the use of the Macintosh, intubation was found to be faster than with the videolaryngoscope (cHR: 1.36 [95% CI 0.64-2.88]; adjusted HR: 2.20 [95% CI 0.73-6.62]). Conclusions: The use of the aerosol box and personal protective equipment in a simulation setting hinders the intubation maneuver and may result in protracted execution time.

Succinylcholine is Equally Efficient as Rocuronium Bromide in terms of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)During Off Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery : A Single Centre Study

Introduction: Rapid and safe endotracheal intubation is of paramount importance in the general anaesthesia practices. Safety of such practices while performing surgical procedures in people with critical coronary lesions assumes increased significance.The use of succinylcholine and rocuronium are common but the association with the application of these medications and concomitant haemodynamic changes on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) has not been adequately studied. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of succinylcholine in comparison with rocuronium for MACE in cardiac surgical population. Methods: Retrospective analysis of data collected from administrative and surgical databases of a tertiary care centre. The patients were divided in two groups,wherein the Group A constituted patients who belonged to succinylcholine and Group B represents the patients who were treated with rocuronium.The baseline demographic characteristics, MACE including intubation difficulty score and Cormack Lahne grade of intubation were recorded. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study. Baseline characters were similar in both the groups. There were 2 deaths in the succinylcholine group while 3 in the rocuronium group. The MACE was not statistically significant (p= 0.0505) in both groups. Cormack Lahane scale and intubation difficulty scale were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Succinylcholine was found to be equally efficient and safe in comparison with rocuronium in terms of MACE during coronary artery bypass surgery.

Is there an optimal place to hold the endotracheal tube during direct laryngoscopy? Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial

Background: Laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation (LEI) is a widely performed lifesaving technique. There are evidence and guidelines to help decide the optimal sized endotracheal tube (ET), laryngoscope, depth of insertion, and patient position for successful endotracheal intubation. We hypothesize that after glottic visualization, the point at which the ET is held will affect the time, ease, and success of the technique due to a difference in visualization and torque. We aim to compare two sites of holding the ET after optimal laryngeal-inlet visualization: time to intubation, rate of success of first pass intubation, intubation difficulty and complications.Methods: Supervised intubations on ASA 1-2 patients (>18 years) posted for surgery under general anesthesia performed by anesthesia trainees (experience <18 months) will be included. Patients with an anticipated difficult airway or unanticipated difficulty - CL grade > three or requiring the use of airway adjuncts will be excluded. A computer-generated numbers list will randomize patients; allocation concealed with opaque sealed envelopes. ET marked at the selected site will be handed to the intubator by the theatre-technician once she/he confirms the optimum laryngoscopic view. The entire procedure will be video recorded. Two blinded assessors will independently review the videos to document the time to intubation (TTI defined as the time from holding the ET to the removal of laryngoscope from the mouth after successful intubation) and intubation difficulty score. Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness will be recorded.Sample size: 54 experienced anesthetists were video-recorded during intubating. The site of holding ET and TTI were analyzed. The mean site was 3 SD 2.5 cm from the tip, yielding two sites for the study- 19 cm (Gr 1) and 24 cm (Gr 2). To detect a 20% difference in intubation time between groups, the confidence of 95%, and power 85%, we will need 298 patients: 180 per group after accounting for data loss.Discussion: This will be the first study to assess whether holding the tube at a particular site has any impact on the ease and time taken for intubation. This study's findings will provide the first scientific evidence for an appropriate place for holding the ET during LEI, which we feel will help trainees improve their LEI technique.Trial registration: CTRI/2019/09/021201, Clinical Trials Registry India. http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/advsearch.php. Registered 12th September 2019,