fire safety engineering
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

233
(FIVE YEARS 51)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Lange ◽  
Peter Johnson ◽  
José L. Torero ◽  
Nate Lobel ◽  
Sarnia Rusbridge ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 103511
Author(s):  
David Lange ◽  
Jose Torero ◽  
Graham Spinardi ◽  
Angus Law ◽  
Peter Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruggiero Lovreglio ◽  
Pete Thompson ◽  
Zhenan Feng

Safety ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Florian Berchtold ◽  
Lukas Arnold ◽  
Christian Knaust ◽  
Sebastian Thöns

In risk-related research of fire safety engineering, metamodels are often applied to approximate the results of complex fire and evacuation simulations. This approximation may cause epistemic uncertainties, and the inherent uncertainties of evacuation simulations may lead to aleatory uncertainties. However, neither the epistemic ‘metamodel uncertainty’ nor the aleatory ‘inherent uncertainty’ have been included in the results of the metamodels for fire safety engineering. For this reason, this paper presents a metamodel that includes metamodel uncertainty and inherent uncertainty in the results of a risk analysis. This metamodel is based on moving least squares; the metamodel uncertainty is derived from the prediction interval. The inherent uncertainty is modelled with an original approach, directly using all replications of evacuation scenarios without the assumption of a specific probability distribution. This generic metamodel was applied on a case study risk analysis of a road tunnel and showed high accuracy. It was found that metamodel uncertainty and inherent uncertainty have clear effects on the results of the risk analysis, which makes their consideration important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document