sperm allocation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Yuki Kondo ◽  
Masanori Kohda ◽  
Yasunori Koya ◽  
Satoshi Awata

2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kambiz Esfandi ◽  
Xiong Z He ◽  
Qiao Wang

Abstract Theories predict that in polyandrous species, the focal male should increase sperm allocation per mate in the presence of rivals to gain greater share of paternity, but in the presence of additional mates, he should reduce sperm allocation per mate to save sperm for insemination of more mates. However, empirical findings are often inconsistent and reasons behind are unclear. Furthermore, many studies use copulation duration as an estimate of the number of sperm transferred. Yet, empirical evidence for such assumption is largely lacking. Here, we used a sperm heteromorphic insect Ephestia kuehniella whose males produce two types of sperm, eupyrenes (fertile) and apyrenes (nonfertile), to test these postulations. We allowed focal males to detect chemical and acoustic but no tactile cues from rivals or additional mates both before and during mating and measured copulation duration and sperm allocation in successive copulations. We demonstrate that males transfer significantly more eupyrenes per mate in the presence of rivals and that the sperm allocation pattern persists in successive copulations under this condition. However, males do not adjust apyrene allocation in response to rivals probably because apyrenes play a relatively minor role in male reproductive success. Contrary to a previous study, focal males do not respond to additional mates most likely due to the lack of tactile cues in the present study. We reveal that sperm allocation is not a function of copulation duration in this insect for spermatophore formation and delivery occupy most of copulation duration and sperm transfer is complete near the end of copulation.


Evolution ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 414-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biz R. Turnell ◽  
Kerry L. Shaw ◽  
H. Kern Reeve
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
pp. 160497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuya Makiguchi ◽  
Masaki Ichimura ◽  
Takenori Kitayama ◽  
Yuuki Kawabata ◽  
Takashi Kitagawa ◽  
...  

To maximize reproductive success, males have to adaptively tailor their sperm expenditure in relation to the quality of potential mates because they require time to replenish their sperm supply for subsequent mating opportunities. Therefore, in mating contexts where males must choose among females in a short period of time, as is the case with semelparous species (which die after one intensely competitive short duration breeding season), selection on sperm allocation can be expected to be a powerful selective agent that shapes the male reproductive success. We quantitatively investigated sperm allocation patterns in chum salmon in relation to perceived female quality by developing a novel method for determining the amount of sperm allocated per ejaculate during spawning bouts. We examined the relationship between sperm expenditure and the body size of paired females (a proxy of egg number and egg quality) in the absence of male–male competition in an experimental channel. The estimated amount of sperm released per spawning event was positively correlated with the size of paired females. However, the number of spawning events a female participated in, which reduces the number of eggs she spawns in each subsequent bout, did not affect this relationship. These results provide support for predictions arising from the sperm allocation hypothesis, male salmon do economize their sperm expenditure in accordance with paired female body size as predicted for their first spawning event, but males overestimate or are unable to assess the quality of females beyond size and provide more sperm than they should in theory when paired with a female that spawned previously. Overall, the observed sperm allocation pattern in chum salmon appears to be adapted to maximize reproductive success assuming female size is an honest indicator of quality, although temporal changes in a female's quality during a reproductive season should be considered when examining sperm allocation strategies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 81-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Jarrige ◽  
Dennis Riemann ◽  
Marlène Goubault ◽  
Tim Schmoll

Ethology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Solana Abraham ◽  
M. Teresa Vera ◽  
Diana Pérez-Staples

2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-865 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald B. Thomas ◽  
Sandra N. Leal ◽  
Hugh E. Conway

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document