Imaging Manifestations and Evaluation of Postoperative Complications of Bone and Joint Infections under Deep Learning

To explore and evaluate the imaging manifestations of postoperative complications of bone and joint infections based on deep learning, a retrospective study was performed on 40 patients with bone and joint infections in the Department of Orthopedics of Orthopedics Hospital of Henan Province of Luoyang City. Sensitivity and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) were used to evaluate the image results by convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm. Imaging features of postoperative complications in 40 patients were analyzed. Then, three imaging methods were used to diagnose the features. Sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three imaging methods for imaging features. Compared with professional doctors and biomarker algorithms, the sensitivity of CNN algorithm proposed was 90.6%, and DSC was 84.1%. Compared with traditional methods, the CNN algorithm has higher image resolution and wider and more accurate lesion area recognition and division. The three manifestations of soft tissue abscess, periosteum swelling, and bone damage were postoperative imaging features of bone and joint infections. In addition, compared with X-ray, CT examination and MRI examination were better for the examination of imaging characteristics. CT and MRI had higher sensitivity and specificity than X-ray. The experimental results show that CNN algorithm can effectively identify and divide pathological images and assist doctors to diagnose the images more efficiently in clinic.

Bone and Joint Infections: The Role of Imaging in Tailoring Diagnosis to Improve Patients’ Care

Imaging is needed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections, determining the severity and extent of disease, planning biopsy, and monitoring the response to treatment. Some radiological features are pathognomonic of bone and joint infections for each modality used. However, imaging diagnosis of these infections is challenging because of several overlaps with non-infectious etiologies. Interventional radiology is generally needed to verify the diagnosis and to identify the microorganism involved in the infectious process through imaging-guided biopsy. This narrative review aims to summarize the radiological features of the commonest orthopedic infections, the indications and the limits of different modalities in the diagnostic strategy as well as to outline recent findings that may facilitate diagnosis.

A systematic review of phage therapy applied to bone and joint infections: an analysis of success rates, treatment modalities and safety

Bone and joint infections are difficult to treat, and increasing antibiotic resistance has only made them more challenging. This has led to renewed interest in phage therapy (PT). The aim of this systematic review was to determine success rate, current treatment modalities and safety of PT in bone and joint infections. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases as well as the journal PHAGE for literature published between January 2000 and April 2021 was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify all human studies assessing bacteriophages as therapy for bone and joint infections. All study designs and patient populations were eligible. The review’s primary outcome was success rate. Twenty records describing a total of 51 patients and 52 treatment episodes were included. No randomized controlled studies were identified. The overall success rate was 71% (n = 37/52). Topical administration alone was the most frequent administration route (85%, n = 44/52). Antibiotics were administered concomitantly with PT in the majority of treatments (79%, n = 41/52), and surgery was performed for 87% (n = 45/52) of treatment episodes. Four minor adverse events related to PT were reported, representing 8% (n = 4/52) of treatment episodes. PT for bone and joint infections has not been evaluated in any randomized controlled clinical study, and current administration modalities are highly variable between case reports and case series. While publications included here show potential benefit and few adverse effects, clinical trials are warranted to assess the efficacy of PT for bone and joint infections and determine optimal treatment modalities. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1148-1156. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210073

254. Excellent Outcomes with Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infections: A Single-Center Experience

Background The OVIVA trial, published in 2019, demonstrated equivalent efficacy of oral (PO) versus intravenous (IV) antibiotics for bone and joint infections. We report our group’s one-year outcomes in a cohort of such patients who received PO or IV antibiotics. Methods Our orthopedic surgery and orthopedic infectious diseases (ID) groups agreed to employ early switch to PO in patients with a first episode of non-vertebral osteomyelitis (OM), native or prosthetic joint infection (NJA or PJI), or hardware infections when a pathogen susceptible to highly bioavailable antibiotics had been identified and the patient was perceived to be at low risk for medication non-adherence. We reviewed patients 19+ years old seen in the Ortho ID clinic for one of these conditions from July 1st through December 31st, 2019. Data recorded included patient demographics and comorbidities, infection type and site, microbiology, and surgical and antibiotic management. Primary outcome was treatment failure at 1 year, defined as death, unplanned surgery at same site, or chronic antibiotic suppression. Results Forty patients (all IV antibiotics, n=17; initial or switch to PO, n=23) were included. Median IV duration was 15 days. PJI was the most common diagnosis (n=22), followed by other hardware infection and OM (n=7 each). Of the PJIs, 13/22 were managed with 2-stage exchange and 11/13 of these received all-IV therapy. Of the hardware infections, 4/7 underwent debridement and retention or single-stage exchange and all of these received initial or switch to PO therapy. Staphylococci (n=14 S. aureus and n=7 coagulase-negative) and streptococci (n=12) were the most common pathogens. Amoxicillin (n=8), trimethoprim-sulfa (n=6), and levofloxacin (n=3) were the most-used PO antibiotics. The PO group received longer treatment (mean 67 vs 48 days). No treatment failures occurred in the patients who started or switch to PO antibiotics, whereas 35% of patients who received all-IV therapy experienced failure. Conclusion Adopting known risk factors for poor outcome in bone and joint infection such as prior treatment failure and no identified pathogen as exclusion criteria for early switch to PO antibiotic therapy led to excellent one-year treatment outcomes across a range of musculoskeletal infections. Disclosures Angela Hewlett, MD, MS, Mapp Biopharmaceutical (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Angela Hewlett, MD, MS, Mapp Biopharmaceutical, Inc (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Scientific Research Study Investigator Nicolas W. Cortes-Penfield, MD, Nothing to disclose

234. Dalbavancin versus Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy with Vancomycin for Treatment of Bone and Joint Infections in a Veteran Population

Background Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide with broad gram-positive activity. A long half-life makes it an attractive treatment option for bone and joint infections (BJI). Previous studies have demonstrated efficacy of dalbavancin in the treatment of BJI. Based on these studies, our institution established a protocol for using dalbavancin as an alternative to IV antibiotics via PICC line. Methods Chart review was performed to compare outcomes of patients who were treated with dalbavancin versus vancomycin for BJI from 8/2017 –7/2020. Patients that received two doses of dalbavancin for BJI were compared with patients who received OPAT with vancomycin during the same time period. Patients were excluded if they were bacteremic or received dalbavancin for another indication. Data was collected from the Veterans Health Administration’s Corporate Data Warehouse and retrospective chart review. No statistical analyses were performed due to the descriptive nature of this study. Results A total of 59 patients were included; 25 received dalbavancin and 34 received vancomycin. Relevant differences in baseline characteristics included a higher proportion of patients with osteomyelitis (88% vs 74%) and refractory infection (64% vs 44%) in the dalbavancin group. More patients in the dalbavancin group (38% vs 24%) were readmitted for the same infection within one year, required (29% vs 21%) additional surgical intervention, and had increased CRPH on follow-up labs (32% vs 3%). Dalbavancin use likely expedited discharge in at least 5 cases where vancomycin levels were not therapeutic. No significant adverse effects due to dalbavancin were noted, aside from one patient with an increase in serum creatinine. In the vancomycin group, 8 patients changed antibiotics due to adverse effects or difficulty managing levels and 3 patients had ED visits for PICC line care. Conclusion Dalbavancin may be a safe PICC-sparing treatment for BJI, particularly in cases where compliance is of concern, or there are logistical or tolerability issues with vancomycin. Our findings do raise concern for worse outcomes with dalbavancin, but the small sample size, difference in baseline characteristics between groups and descriptive nature of the study preclude any conclusions from being drawn. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures