engineering identity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

119
(FIVE YEARS 74)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Scalaro ◽  
Indira Chatterjee ◽  
Ann-Marie Vollstedt ◽  
Jeffrey LaCombe ◽  
Adam Kirn

Author(s):  
Jerrod Henderson ◽  
Virginia Snodgrass Rangel ◽  
James Holly ◽  
Rick Greer ◽  
Mariam Manuel

Author(s):  
Matthew Bahnson ◽  
Heather Perkins ◽  
Marissa Tsugawa ◽  
Derrick Satterfield ◽  
Mackenzie Parker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-177
Author(s):  
Christine Allison Gray ◽  
Ron E. Gray ◽  
Martha M. Canipe ◽  
Shadow W. J. Armfield ◽  
Robin Tuchscherer

Research in engineering education has identified several factors relevant to the development of students’ identity as engineers. Here we examine the engineering identity of undergraduate engineering students after an introductory engineering course. The specific research question explored here is: "How do engineering students in an introductory engineering course interpret competence, performance, and recognition in relation to their identities as engineers?” We used a modified engineering identity framework to explore the development of engineering identity within the undergraduate engineering context through a multiple case study approach. Six students majoring in engineering participated in the study. The students had divergent perspectives on what it meant to be competent as an engineer. In all cases, students connected both competence and performance as an engineer with persistence. At this introductory stage, self-recognition as an engineering person took center stage for each student. All were able to identify themselves strongly as an engineering person. The findings add to the current understandings about the development of engineering identity, and suggest that engineering identity may be critically important in conversations about the steps faculty may take in working with students to promote increased retention of undergraduate students in engineering.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tugba Karabiyik ◽  
Ying Ying Seah ◽  
Alejandra Magana ◽  
Xudong Huang ◽  
Shannon Sung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Liang Zhu ◽  
Shuyan Sun ◽  
L D Timmie Topoleski ◽  
Charles Eggleton ◽  
Ronghui Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Since 2009, the ME STEM Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore County has provided financial support and program activities to ME undergraduate students aiming at improving their retention and graduation rates. The objective of this study is to identify program activities that were most effective to help students for improvements. Current ME S-STEM scholars were asked to complete a survey that measures their scientific efficacy, engineering identity, expectations, integration, and sense of belonging, as well as how program activities impact their attitudes and perceptions. Analyses of 36 surveys showed that scholars reported high levels of engineering identity, expectations, and sense of belonging. However, further improvements were needed to help students in achieving scientific efficacy and academic integration into the program. Results demonstrated that proactive mentoring was the most effective method contributing to positive attitudes and perceptions. The implemented S-STEM research-related activities and internship were viewed favorably by the scholars in helping them establish their scientific efficacy and engineering identity, and understand their expectations and goals. Community building activities were considered helpful for them to integrate into campus life and improve their sense of belonging to the campus and program. Scholars identified mentoring, research related activities, internships, and social interaction with faculty and their peers as important factors for their retention and graduation. Although the sample size was small in the study, we believe that the cost-effective activities identified could be adopted by other institutions to further improve students' retention and graduation rates in engineering programs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document