fundic gland polyp
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

40
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Mao Miyoshi ◽  
Shunsuke Yamamoto ◽  
Yoji Takeuchi ◽  
Hisashi Ishida ◽  
Eiji Mita

Pathobiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
He Gao ◽  
Lili Chang ◽  
Limin Wang ◽  
Xiaona Zhou ◽  
Ning Wang

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this study was to study the relationship between the formation of gastric fundic gland polyp and gastric hyperplastic polyp (HP) and the changes of gastric juice microenvironment. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) applications to patients were recorded. Gastric juices and biopsy polyps were collected for pathological examination, <i>H. pylori</i> tests, biomarkers, and <i>MUC1</i>, <i>MUC2</i>, <i>MUC5AC expression</i> measurement. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Among 34,892 patients, the detection rate of gastric fundic gland polyps was significantly higher than that of gastric HPs (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). The incidence rate of gastric fundic gland polyp and gastric HP in PPI users (<i>n</i> = 3,886) was higher than that of non-PPI users (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). The occurrence of polyp was positively related to the duration of PPI application and the <i>H. pylori</i>-positive rate. The bile reflux rate between fundic gland polys group (17.61%) and HPs (28.67%) was significantly different (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). The levels of gastric juice Gastrin-17, epidermal growth factor (EGF) and MUC<sub>2</sub> from patients with gastric fundic gland polyps and gastric HPs were higher than those in the control group (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). However, patients with gastric fundic gland polyps and HPs had significantly lower gastric juice PGE<sub>2</sub> and MUC5AC (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> PPI application, <i>H. pylori</i> infection, and bile reflux are the potential risk factors for formation of fundic gland polyps and HPs. The potential mechanism of polyps’ formation can be related to the levels of Gastrin-17, EGF, MUC<sub>2</sub>, PGE<sub>2</sub>, and MUC5AC in gastric juice.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106689692199418
Author(s):  
John D. Coyne ◽  
S. Thampy

Pseudo-signet ring parietal cell vacuolation has been described as a mimic of invasive signet ring cell carcinoma. Moreover, signet ring cell carcinoma has been described in a fundic gland polyp. This case demonstrates parietal cell vacuolation in a fundic gland polyp in a patient on a long-term proton pump inhibitor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 740-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshitaka Nawata ◽  
Shin Ichihara ◽  
Dai Hirasawa ◽  
Ippei Tanaka ◽  
Shuuhei Unno ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1102-1106
Author(s):  
Satoru Nonaka ◽  
Taiki Hashimoto ◽  
Ichiro Oda ◽  
Shigeki Sekine

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 107327482092255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Miao ◽  
Yi Liu ◽  
Guodong Zhao ◽  
Xiaoyu Liu ◽  
Yong Ma ◽  
...  

Gastric cancer (GC) is fifth most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer in China. More than 80% of GC are diagnosed at an advanced stage due to low uptake rate of invasive screening method. The performance of methylated SFRP2 test was evaluated in 236 plasma samples, including 92 patients with GC, 16 intestinal metaplasia patients, 26 gastric fundic gland polyp patients, 13 small adenoma patients, 39 hyperplastic polyp patients, and 50 control patients. The sensitivity of plasma methylated SFRP2 was compared to serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and CA242 results in 79 patients with GC. The sensitivities for detecting GC and gastric intestinal metaplasia by methylated SFRP2 test were 60.9% and 56.3% with a specificity of 86.0%. Methylated SFRP2 test had significantly higher positive detection rate for patients with GC than gastric fundic gland polyp, small adenoma, and hyperplastic polyp patients. In 79 patients with GC, the sensitivities of CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, and CA242 for detecting GC were 22.8%, 16.5%, 12.7%, and 11.4%. In comparison, the sensitivity of methylated SFRP2 test for detecting GC was 58.2%. Plasma methylated SFRP2 test may become a valuable tool for the noninvasive detection of GC and precursor lesions and showed higher sensitivity than serum tumor markers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document