Metaphors, powerlessness and online aggression

A lockdown was imposed in Wuhan, China, the alleged epicentre of the COVID-19 outbreak, on 23 January 2020. Rattled by the short notice and severity of the restrictions, many grabbed the last opportunity to escape, an act widely criticised on Weibo, China’s popular microblogging site. This study aims to examine the unsavoury discourse deployed by Weibo users to express impoliteness and discursively construct negative identities of the lockdown escapees. Posts on Weibo criticising, reporting and threatening the escapees were analysed, revealing that the escapees were dehumanised through vivid animal metaphors to highlight their irresponsibility and call for their punishment. Animal metaphors can co-occur with various impoliteness triggers to intensify offensiveness, heightening the hostility of interlocutors towards a target. This use of metaphors also showcases online users’ anger, distrust, and hatred towards the escapees, their solidarity-seeking behaviour online and their irrationality.

Pandemic and Education

The emergence and rapid spread of the Coronavirus in the spring of 2020 has fundamentally changed our lives. The most important change has been the attempt to minimise face–to–face contacts everywhere in order to keep the epidemic under control. Public gatherings were banned, shopping malls were closed, and sporting events were also cancelled. As COVID–19 spread as easily among children as among adults, schools could not escape the restrictions. During the first wave of the epidemic, institutions had to switch to emergency remote education (ERE) at very short notice, which presented a number of problems for all participants. These problems and experiences of the switch should be collected at all levels of education, as they not only help to prepare for similar situations, but may also lead to conclusions that can be used to make the methods and solutions of classroom–based teaching more motivating, more effective or even more efficient. In this paper, we review both the challenges of the transition and the possible implications for the future teaching–learning process by reflecting on the lessons learned.

Ethical Decision Making Under Time Pressure: An Online Study

Although research in Psychology and Philosophy indicates people’s preference for utilitarian ethics, how people respond to ethically fraught scenarios under time pressure is unclear. In this online experiment, 61 participants viewed videos of a simulated automated vehicle (AV) as it drove in the right lane on a four-lane road and were instructed to intervene if they thought that the vehicle should move to the left lane. At a crosswalk, five pedestrian avatars appeared one, two, or three seconds before projected impact either in the path of the vehicle or the left lane, with a single pedestrian appearing in the opposite lane half the time. Participants avoided the group of five (utilitarian response) but were more likely to veer into the group of five pedestrians at one second before impact than longer durations, violating utilitarian ethics under time pressure. This suggests limited ability to respond to ethical scenarios when taking over AV control at short notice.

Going virtual: adapting in-person interactive focus groups to the online environment

Restrictions on social interaction and travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic have affected how researchers approach fieldwork and data collection. Whilst online focus groups have received attention since the 2000s as a method for qualitative data collection, relatively little of the relevant literature appears to have made use of now ubiquitous video calling software and synchronous, interactive discussion tools. Our own experiences in organising fieldwork aimed at understanding the impact of different ‘future-proofing’ strategies for the European agri-food system during this period resulted in several methodological changes being made at short notice. We present an approach to converting in-person focus group to a virtual methodology and provide a checklist for researchers planning their own online focus groups. Our findings suggest data are comparable to in-person focus groups and factors influencing data quality during online focus groups can be safeguarded. There are several key steps, both before and during the focus groups, which can be taken to ensure the smooth running of such events. We share our reflections on this approach and provide a resource for other researchers moving to online-only data collection.

O34 Colorectal cancer resections during COVID-19: to do or not to do?

Introduction Ascertaining the practice of colorectal cancer (CRC) resections during the COVID-19 pandemic in England and Wales. Method A list of all colorectal multi-disciplinary teams (MDTs) was obtained from the National Bowel Cancer Audit (NBOCA) database. A survey was designed using Google Forms and emailed to at least one consultant colorectal surgeon of each MDT. One response per MDT was used in the analysis. All responses were anonymous. Study duration was from 15th April 2020 to 30th June 2020. Result Sixty-eight of the 150 MDTs enlisted on the NBOCA database in England and Wales responded. 86.6% were performing CRC resections and 86% were screening patients pre-operatively for COVID-19. 84.9% were using full Personal Protective Equipment (PPE—FFP3 and eye protection) in all cases whereas 12.3% were using PPE only in suspected cases. 44.4% had resorted to open resections due to risk of laparoscopy being an aerosol generating procedure. 13.7% attributed post-operative complications to COVID-19 and 4 centres reported death due to COVID-19 related complications. 40% of MDTs used short course radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients where resections were postponed either by patient or by the team. 55% responded to feeling uncomfortable/very uncomfortable to cancel cancer resections while 31.7% were equivocal and others comfortable not to operate during the pandemic. Conclusion This survey demonstrates a snapshot of practice during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The majority of the centres continued to perform CRC resections safely where possible. There has been obvious disruption to services and change to normal practice. Take-home Message COVID-19 led to an unprecedented situation where safe guidance had to be implemented at short notice to enable safe surgical practice. This survey aimed to establish how colorectal MDTs in England and Wales were adapting their colorectal cancer resection practice in light of new guidance amidst the first wave of the pandemic.

ACCURACY VALIDATION OF TILTED CAMERA SETUPS IN OPEN SKIES PROJECT AND MAPPING APPLICATIONS

Signed March 24, 1992, the Open Skies Treaty permits each state-party to conduct short-notice, unarmed, reconnaissance flights over the others' entire territories to collect data on military forces and activities. Observation aircraft equipped with sensors shall enable the observing party to identify significant military equipment. The Open Skies Treaty agreed on an observation of 30cm GSD. Based on 8 mid-format cameras for 3 flight levels, a system was adjusted to comply with the regulations. However, the overall aim was to also use the system for mapping purposes in Romania, specifically the medium altitude configuration. From this medium altitude configuration, one specific combination raised our interest. The designed wide corridor mapping system, using two RGB tilted cameras and one RGB nadir camera generates a certain range of resolution of the sideward looking tilted cameras and a non-homogenous distribution of the GSD in the overlapping areas. While a reduction of the GSD in the remote parts of the tilted cameras is a well-known and accepted fact, the effect in the overlap of the tilted cameras with the nadir one is the opposite mathematically. In some cases, such an effect can cause a better GSD in these areas than expected.

924 The Effect of COVID On the Skin Cancer Referral Pathway

Introduction Due to COVID resulting in all elective surgeries being cancelled; it was thought that patients with suspected skin cancer maybe seeing a specialist and having surgery later than. So, to tackle this as lockdown occurred, the Plastic Surgery department at Charing Cross Hospital secured a minor operation room in outpatients, to keep treating suspected skin cancer. But did it work? Method Data was collected from an interval of 2 months before the pandemic (December-January) and 2 months post the pandemic (April-May). Each suspected skin cancer patient who was put on the two weeks wait referral during that time had their receipt of referral, first appointment with a specialist and date of surgery (if that was done) recorded. Results Before COVID 81% of patients were seen by a specialist in 2 weeks compared to 89% after COVID. Also, 78% of patients had achieved surgery within 62 days before the pandemic, compared to 86% after the pandemic. Conclusions In conclusion, the results showed that the implementation of the minor operation room at short notice enabled the department to meet capacity. Thus, it is utilisation going forward can improve how quickly skin cancers are managed.

Going virtual: adapting in-person interactive focus groups to the online environment

Restrictions on social interaction and travel due to the COVID-19 pandemic have affected how researchers approach fieldwork and data collection. Whilst online focus groups have received attention since the 2000s as a method for qualitative data collection, relatively little of the relevant literature appears to have made use of now ubiquitous video calling software and synchronous, interactive discussion tools. Our own experiences in organising fieldwork aimed at understanding the impact of different ‘future-proofing’ strategies for the European agri-food system during this period resulted in several methodological changes being made at short notice. We present an approach to converting in-person focus group to a virtual methodology and provide a checklist for researchers planning their own online focus groups. Our findings suggest data are comparable to in-person focus groups and factors influencing data quality during online focus groups can be safeguarded. There are several key steps, both before and during the focus groups, which can be taken to ensure the smooth running of such events. We share our reflections on this approach and provide a resource for other researchers moving to online-only data collection.

Undertaking a high stakes virtual OSCE (“VOSCE”) during Covid-19

Background The Covid pandemic and associated lockdown forced medical schools globally not only to deliver emergency remote teaching, but to consider alternative methods of high stakes assessment. Here we outline our approach to the resit virtual OSCE (“VOSCE”) for final year medical students that we undertook during “lockdown” in the current pandemic. Methods The original ‘pre Covid’ examination blueprint was reviewed and modified for the virtual environment in both format and content. In anticipation of the new format delivery, a number of pre-training sessions took place for all parties, and standardised templates were developed. Results A total of 9 students undertook the VOSCE, which took the form of a two-part exam (a communication and clinical examination component, and a practical procedures component). The VOSCE was completed by all students, examiners, simulated patients and invigilators on an online digital platform with no issues with regards to technical problems. Conclusions A total of 6 students passed the VOSCE and as such progressed to graduation. The limitation of assessing some particular types of skills across the remote format (such as practical procedures) was recognised. The training and the templates developed were helpful in case the VOSCE format needs to be adopted in future at short notice and/or expanded in future.