lumbar disc replacement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

106
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-33
Author(s):  
I. A. Stepanov ◽  
V. A. Beloborodov ◽  
Z. S. Saakyan ◽  
I. I. Tomashov ◽  
V. G. Trepeznikov

The study objective is to analyze long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in patients after performing total lumbar disc replacement at the level of the lumbosacral junction.Materials and methods. A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was performed. The study included medical records of patients who underwent total lumbar disc replacement at the level of the lumbosacral junction. Both clinical and instrumental parameters were assessed. According to the eligibility criteria, 93 patients were included in the study (38 men, 55 women, mean age 39.9 ± 7.5 years). The average postoperative observation period for the respondents was 33.4 ± 9.5 months.Results. The severity of pain in the lumbar spine on a visual analogue scale significantly decreased (from 7.3 ± 2.5 to 1.9 ± 2.2 cm, p <0.001). The indicators of the quality of life according to the Oswestry Disability Index and according to the Short Form-36 scale (including the mental and physical components) of the studied group of respondents significantly improved (from 43.4 ± 17.6 to 18.9 ± 16.0 %, р <0.001 and from 30.8 ± 8.5 to 52.3 ± 12.4 %, p <0.001, respectively). From the 12th month of observation of the respondents, a significant decrease in the values of the range of motions of the operated segment was noted from 5.3 ± 3.2° to 4.1 ± 3.6° (p <0.009). Also, from the 12th month of postoperative observation, a slight decrease in the values of the range of motions of the adjacent segment from 8.6 ± 4.1° to 7.8 ± 3.8° (p >0.05) was verified. The value of global lumbar lordosis after the installation of a lumbar intervertebral disc prosthesis at the level of the lumbosacral junction significantly increased from 49.1 ± 4.8° to 55.6 ± 5.5° (p <0.001). Intervertebral disc prostheses with a lordotic angle of 10° reliably positively correlate with an increase in the values of segmental lordosis, in contrast to implants with an angle of 6° (rS = 0.86, p = 0.04). The severity of pain in the lumbar spine according to visual analogue scale and the range of motion of the operated segment has a significant negative correlation in the late periods of postoperative follow-up (24 and 36 months, rS = -0.74, p = 0.015).Conclusion. The total lumbar disc replacement technique is an effective method of surgical treatment of patients with degenerative diseases of the intervertebral discs of the lumbosacral spine, including at the level of the lumbosacral junction.


10.14444/8004 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-46
Author(s):  
Gregory D. Schroeder ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
Srikanth N. Divi ◽  
Ariana A. Reyes ◽  
Dhruv K.C. Goyal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1544-1552
Author(s):  
J. Kitzen ◽  
V. Verbiest ◽  
I. Buil ◽  
M. G. M. Schotanus ◽  
B. van Rietbergen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1527-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Kitzen ◽  
M. G. M. Schotanus ◽  
S. M. J. van Kuijk ◽  
E. M. C. Jutten ◽  
N. P. Kort ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Dorenkamp ◽  
Madisen K. Janssen ◽  
Michael E. Janssen

Abstract Background There is minimal literature discussing anterior lumbar spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). The main concern with the anterior approach to the lumbar spine is the potential for injury to great vessels. In our facility, there are two units of crossmatched blood available in addition to cell saver during the procedure. We retrospectively looked at 50 cases of lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA) in our ASC to determine utilization of blood products. Methods Medical records of 50 consecutive patients who underwent a lumbar TDA at a single ASC were reviewed. Surgeries completed at the ASC were all transferred from the post anesthesia care unit to an attached convalescence care center which allows up to 3 days of observation. Patients who had either a 1 or 2 level lumbar TDA were included in the study. Data consisting of demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status Classification System, length of stay, estimated blood loss, cell saver volume, transfusion, perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative medical records were reviewed. Results Medical records of 50 consecutive patients were reviewed. The mean age was 40.86 ± 9.45. Of these, 48 (96%) had a 1-level lumbar TDA, 1(2%) had a 2-level lumbar TDA, 1 (2%) had a lumbar TDA at L4/5 and an anterior lumbar interbody fusion at L5/S1. There were no mortalities; no patient had recorded perioperative complications. No patients received allogeneic blood transfusion, 4 (8%) were re-transfused with cell saver (2 receiving approximately 400 ml and 2 receiving approximately 200 ml of re-transfused blood). All 50 (100%) were discharged home in stable condition. We had 30-day follow-up data on 35 of 50 patients. Of the 35 patients reviewed, three (8.5%) of the patients were readmitted to the hospital. One additional patient was seen in the emergency department and discharged home after negative testing. No patient was readmitted for post-operative anemia. Conclusion The routine use of both cell saver and crossmatched blood in the operating suite for lumbar TDA may be an over-utilization of healthcare resources. In our review of 50 patients, we had no need for transfusion of allogeneic packed red blood cells (PRBCs) and only four of the 50 patients had enough blood output for re-transfusion from the cell saver. This opens the conversation for alternatives to crossmatched PRBCs being held in the operating room. Such alternatives may be the use of cell salvage, only type O blood in a cooler for each patient or keeping type O blood on constant hold in ASCs.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faheem A Sandhu ◽  
Ehsan Dowlati ◽  
Rolando Garica

Abstract Lumbar degenerative disc disease is a pathologic process that affects a large portion of our aging population. In the recent past, surgical treatment has involved fusion procedures. However, lumbar disc arthroplasty and replacement provides an alternative for carefully selected patients. It provides the major advantage of motion preservation and thus keeps adjacent segments from significantly progressive degeneration. The history of lumbar disc replacement has roots that start in the 1960s with the implantation of stainless-steel balls. Decades later, multiple implants with different material design and biomechanical properties were introduced to the market. New third-generation implants have made great strides in improved biomechanics and clinical outcomes. Although there is room for further advancement and studies are warranted to assess the long-term durability and sustainability of lumbar disc arthroplasty, it has certainly proven to be a very acceptable alternative within the surgical armamentarium that should be offered to patients who meet indications. In this review we present an overview of lumbar disc arthroplasty including its history, indications, biomechanics, challenges, and future directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document