Study of various treatment modalities of caesarean scar pregnancy

Background: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) can be defined as the implantation of the gestational sac within the scar of a previous caesarean surgery. Incidence of CSP is 1 in 1800 pregnancies.Methods: It is a retrospective study based on clinical diagnosis and management of CSP of women who presented to the obstetrics and gynaecology department SVP hospital from January 2008 to August 2021. Total number of cases of CSP were 28. Incidence, gestational age, ultrasound findings, serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels, flow profiles of color Doppler, and different methods of treatment were recorded. Diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound.Results: In this study, all 28 cases of CSP considered were offered definitive management. In present study 5 cases (17.88%) showed torrential haemorrhage during dilatation and evacuation (D and E) which was treated by various methods like 1 (3.57%) Foley’s tamponade, 1 (3.57%) uterine artery embolization (UAE) and 3 (10.71%) hysterectomy. Hysterotomy was performed in 13 cases (46.42%) and (7.69%) of heterotrophic CSP (HCSP). One case (3.84%) of CSP presented at 26 weeks of gestation with haemorrhagic shock, underwent obstetric hysterectomy.Conclusions: There is a rise in the incidence of CSP because of increase in the global rate of caesarean sections and early transvaginal USG in pregnancy. Transvaginal sonography is the best diagnostic tool. Medical management can be offered when diagnosis is made at gestational age of <7 weeks. Whereas, surgical modalities have shown better results at >7 weeks of gestational age. Surgical management has an advantage of shorter follow up.

CAESAREAN SCAR ECTOPIC -A RARE ENTITY

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an ectopic pregnancy implanted in (1) the myometrium at the site of a previous caesarean section scar Its incidence is rising with the increase in number of caesarean sections .Very rst case was reported in 1978

Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for High-risk Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study

Background: Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) can have catastrophic consequences. A standardized diagnosis and treatment for CSP are still lacking. The currently available treatment methods are confusing, and at least 10 different treatment measures exist. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of with laparotomy or laparoscopy in the treatment of high-risk CSP. Methods: We reviewed 935 patients with CSP from 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2018. A total of 278 patients were included in the study, of whom 121 were treated with laparoscopy and 157 were treated with laparotomy.Results: We compared and analysed the characteristics of the laparoscopic and open surgeries in the treatment of high-risk CSP and the advantages and disadvantages of different methods of vascular pretreatment. Intraoperative bleeding, transfusion rate, total days of hospitalization and postoperative hospital stay were better in laparoscopy than in laparotomy (P < 0.05). There was no difference in the factors (β-HCG decrease, reoperation and tissue residues) closely related to the success of the surgery in the two groups. Furthermore, we pretreated blood vessels differently before the operation in some patients. Tissue residue, reoperation and intraoperative blood transfusion rates in patients with temporary vascular occlusion were better than in patients with permanent vascular occlusion. Conclusions: This study revealed that laparoscopic surgery is superior to laparotomic surgery in the treatment of high-risk CSP. Patients benefited from temporary arterial occlusion in both groups. Temporary arterial occlusion under laparoscopic surgery may be the best treatment for high-risk CSP.