consumptive water use
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 2)

MAUSAM ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
S. SENGUPTA ◽  
H. P. DAS ◽  
A. A. KALE

In the present study, evapotranspiration and other agrometeorological data for three different locations, viz., Akola. Bellary and Kovilpatti have been utilized to understand consumptive use and related aspects of cotton. Ratios of evapotranspiration to potential evapotranspiration (ET/PET) and evapotranspiration to total shortwave radiation (ET/Rs) increase gradually as the vegetative cover develops and shows year to year variation at same location. The energy summation indices have been worked out for all the three stations which indicate that the total yields are more dependent on consumptive water use by crop rather than energy summation indices.. The water use efficiency (WUE) of cotton crop also reveals wide variations in time and space.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (17) ◽  
pp. 6628-6669
Author(s):  
Indrani Choudhury ◽  
B.K. Bhattacharya ◽  
R. Eswar ◽  
M. Sekhar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azeez Yusuf ◽  
Dylan O'Flynn ◽  
Blanaid White ◽  
Linda Holland ◽  
Anne Parle-McDermott ◽  
...  

Water scarcity is increasingly a global cause of concern mainly due to widespread changes in climate conditions and increased consumptive water use driven by the exponential increase in population growth.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (22) ◽  
pp. 9535
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Talha Mahmood ◽  
Christopher Conrad ◽  
Habib Ullah Bodla

Water crises are becoming severe in recent times, further fueled by population increase and climate change. They result in complex and unsustainable water management. Spatial estimation of consumptive water use is vital for performance assessment of the irrigation system using Remote Sensing (RS). For this study, its estimation is done using the Soil Energy Balance Algorithm for Land (SEBAL) approach. Performance indicators including equity, adequacy, and reliability were worked out at various spatiotemporal scales. Moreover, optimization and sustainable use of water resources are not possible without knowing the factors mainly influencing consumptive water use of major crops. For that purpose, random forest regression modelling was employed using various sets of factors for site-specific, proximity, and cropping system. The results show that the system is underperforming both for Kharif (i.e., summer) and Rabi (i.e., winter) seasons. Performance indicators highlight poor water distribution in the system, a shortage of water supply, and unreliability. The results are relatively good for Rabi as compared to Kharif, with an overall poor situation for both seasons. Factors importance varies for different crops. Overall, distance from canal, road density, canal density, and farm approachability are the most important factors for explaining consumptive water use. Auditing of consumptive water use shows the potential for resource optimization through on-farm water management by the targeted approach. The results are based on the present situation without considering future changes in canal water supply and consumptive water use under climate change.


2020 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 106267 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Jovanovic ◽  
L.S. Pereira ◽  
P. Paredes ◽  
I. Pôças ◽  
V. Cantore ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Talha Mahmood ◽  
Christopher Conrad

<p>Textile products made with cotton produced in Pakistan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan are largely imported to European markets. This is responsible for high virtual water imports from these countries and thus puts immense pressure on their water resources, which is further extravagated due to climate change and population growth. The solution to combat the issue, on one hand, is to cut water usage for cotton irrigation, and on the other hand, to increase water productivity. The biggest challenge in this regard is the correct quantification of consumptive water use, cotton yield estimation and crop water productivities at a finer spatial resolution on regional levels, which is now possible by utilizing remote sensing (RS) data and approaches. It can also facilitate comparing regions of interest, like in this study, Pakistan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan by utilizing similar data and techniques. For the current study, MODIS data along with various climatic variables were utilized for the estimation of consumptive water use and cotton yield estimation by employing SEBAL and Light Use Efficiency (LUE) models, respectively. These estimations were then used for working out water productivities of different regions of selected countries as case studies. The results show that the study area in Turkey achieved maximum cotton water productivity (i.e. 0.75 - 1.2 kg.m<sup>-3</sup>) followed by those in Uzbekistan (0.05 – 0.85 kg.m<sup>-3</sup>) and Pakistan (0.04 – 0.23 kg.m<sup>-3</sup>).  The variability is higher for Uzbekistan possibly due to agricultural transition post-soviet-union era. In the case of Pakistan, the lower cotton water productivities are mainly attributed to lower crop yields (400 – 1200 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup>) in comparison to Turkey (3850 – 5800 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup>) and Uzbekistan (450 – 2500 kg.ha<sup>-1</sup>). Although the highest crop water productivity is achieved for the study region in Turkey, there is still potential for further improvement by introducing on-farm water management. In the case of the other two countries, especially for Pakistan, major improvements are possible through maximizing crop yields. The next steps include comparisons of the results in economic out-turns.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Knight ◽  
Dewayne L. Ingram ◽  
Charles R. Hall

The understanding, calculation, and comparison of water footprint (WF) among specialty crop growers are confounded by geography, species, and process. This study builds on published models of representative plant production systems developed using life cycle assessment. These models include container production using recycled water in the mid-Atlantic, southeastern, and Pacific northwestern regions of the United States and greenhouse production implementing rainfall capture and overhead and ebb/flood irrigation strategies. Production systems using recycled water compare favorably in consumptive water use (CWU) with those that do not, regardless of the water source. Production systems in geographic locations with high water availability compare favorably with production systems in locations with high water scarcity in WF, but not necessarily CWU.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document