The Efficacy of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization With Flow Reversal System Compared to Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Carotid artery stenosis has long been a critical cause of stroke and death, and it can seriously affect the life quality. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are both feasible therapies for this disease. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate if the efficacy of the two approaches is comparable.Methods: Clinical studies up to March 2021 were searched through PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from a computer. The screening process was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for methodological quality assessment of works of literature meeting the inclusion criteria, and Review Manager 5.4 was used for data synthesis. The I2 statistic was performed to measure the heterogeneity, and M-H/I-V fixed or random model was utilized depending on the I2 value. The evidence evaluation was accomplished based on grades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) online tool.Results: A total of 14,200 subjects (six comparative studies) were finally included in this pooled study. There is no statistical discrepancy between the two treatments on reducing stroke/death/myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.67–1.07), stroke (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.77–1.37), or death (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.67–1.94). Besides, TCAR is associated with a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (P = 0.004), cranial nerve injury (P < 0.00001), and shorter procedure time (P < 0.00001) than CEA among the overall cohort.Conclusions: TCAR is a rapidly developing treatment that reaches a comparable prognosis to CEA and significantly reduces the risk of myocardial infarction under the well-matched condition, which is a dependable choice for patients with carotid stenosis.

Factors Associated with Cranial Nerve Injury after Radiotherapy for Large Brain Metastases

This paper mainly studied the correlation factors of cranial nerve injury after radiotherapy for large brain metastases by investigating the influencing factors and predictors of cranial nerve injury, which can provide a good reference and idea for radiotherapy. Through a large number of experiments, it is proved that the research idea proposed in this paper is reasonable and correct.

Unusual course of the vagus nerve passing anterior to the internal carotid artery during carotid endarterectomy

Background: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a conventional surgical technique to prevent ischemic stroke and the effectiveness for advanced lesions is established in many large studies. The vagus nerve is one of the cranial nerves that we usually encounter during CEA manipulation, which is identified as located posterior to the vessels in a position posterolateral to the carotid artery and posteromedial to the internal jugular vein. Case Description: We experienced an extremely rare case of the vagus nerve passing anterior to the internal carotid artery during CEA. Conclusion: We should be careful not to accidentally cut off because the variation of the vagus nerve can be mistaken for an ansa cervicalis. A delicate and complete dissection to understand the variation of the vagus nerve is crucial to minimize the risk of cranial nerve injury during CEA.

Clinoidal Meningioma with Cavernous Sinus Invasion

We present a-49-year old female presenting headache and progressive right eye visual loss in the last 6 months. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a large clinoidal meningioma on the right side, invading the superior, lateral and medial aspects of the cavernous sinus, the optic canal, and the clinoidal segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA).A cranio-orbital approach was performed. The anterior clinoid process was removed extradurally to achieve devascularization of the anterior clinoidal meningioma, followed by the peeling of the middle fossa to decompress V2 and open the superior orbital fissure. We open the dura in a standard fronto-temporal flap to access the lower portion of the skull base allowing retractorless dissection. We complete the removal of the anterior clinoid process and optic strut through an intradural approach. It allows safer dissection of the clinoidal segment of the ICA and avoids its injury by adherent and hard consistency tumor.Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, sharp dissection, and avoiding the use of bipolar coagulation when dissecting the cavernous sinus are essential to minimize the risk of cranial nerve injury. We also like to point that cranial nerve deficit caused by surgical manipulation without primary lesion of the nerve can be recovered postoperatively.The link to the video can be found at: https://youtu.be/ozUCsnUGxyM.

A Prospective Study on the Incidence and Outcome of Cranial Nerve Injuries in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injuries

Background Posttraumatic cranial nerve injuries are not uncommon and can occur by shearing forces, rapid acceleration/deceleration, or injury to the skull base. The incidence of cranial nerve injury in craniocerebral trauma varies between 5 and 23 percent in various literature. Methodology A prospective study was conducted on the incidence and outcome of cranial nerve injuries (CNI) in 256 consecutive cases of traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Patients over the age of 5 years with a follow-up of 6 months in the period from September 2017 to November 2018 in our institution were sampled. Results A total of 256 patients were included in our study. The incidence of CNI in TBI patients was 14.8% (38 patients). Facial nerve was the most common cranial nerve to be involved, followed by olfactory nerve and vestibulocochlear nerve. Cranial nerve injury was more common in patients with severe head injury (p < 0.005), younger age group, associated base of skull fractures (p < 0.001), and facial fractures (p < 0.005). Twenty-eight patients (73.7%) had a delayed presentation of CNI (p < 0.001). Of the 73.6% patients who recovered, 16 (42%) patients had partial recovery, while 12 (31%) patients had complete recovery. Younger age group (p < 0.05) and delayed onset of deficit (p < 0.001) were associated with significant better outcome. Conclusions CNI are a major cause of morbidity in TBI patients. All patients admitted with TBI should be examined meticulously for CNI on follow-up.

The effect of preoperative embolization on surgical outcomes for carotid body tumor resection

Objective: Compare the effects of preoperative embolization for carotid body tumor resection on surgical outcomes to carotid body tumor resections without preoperative embolization. Methods: Single-center retrospective review of all consecutive patients who underwent carotid body tumor resection from 2001 to 2019. Surgical outcomes with emphasis on operative time (estimated blood loss and cranial nerve injury) of patients undergoing carotid body tumor resection following preoperative embolization were compared to those undergoing resection alone using unpaired Student’s t-test and Fisher’s exact test. Results: Forty-six patients (15% male, mean age 50 ± 15 years) underwent resection of 49 carotid body tumors. Patients undergoing preoperative embolization ( n = 20 (40%)) had larger mean tumor size (4.0 ± 0.7 vs 3.2 ± 1 cm, p = 0.006), increased Shamblin II/III tumor classification (18 (90%) vs 22 (76%), p < 0.001), operative time (337 ± 195 vs 199 ± 100 min, p = 0.004), and cranial nerve injuries overall (8 (40%) vs 2 (10%), p = 0.01) compared to patients undergoing resection without preoperative embolization ( n = 29 (60%)). In subgroup analysis of Shamblin II/III classification tumors ( n = 40), preoperative embolization ( n = 18) was associated with increased tumor size (4.1 ± 0.6 vs 3.5 ± 0.9 cm, p = 0.01), operative time (351 ± 191 vs 244 ± 105 min, p = 0.02), and cranial nerve injury overall (8 (44%) vs 2 (9%), p = 0.03) compared to resections alone ( n = 19). In further subgroup analysis of large (⩾ 3 cm) tumors ( n = 37), preoperative embolization ( n = 18) was associated with increased operative time (350 ± 191 vs 198 ± 99 min, p = 0.006) and cranial nerve injury overall (8 (44%) vs 2 (11%), p = 0.03) compared to resections alone ( n = 19). There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, or hematoma formation between any of the embolization and non-embolization subgroups. Conclusion: After controlling for tumor Shamblin classification and size, carotid body tumor resections following preoperative embolization were associated with increased operative time and inferior surgical outcomes compared to those tumors undergoing resection alone. Nonetheless, such results remain susceptible to the confounding effects of individual tumor characteristics often used in the decision to perform preoperative embolization, underscoring the need for prospective studies evaluating the utility of preoperative embolization for carotid body tumors.

Outcome of Extracranial Carotid Pseudoaneurysm Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Introduction Extracranial carotid pseudoaneurysm (ECPA) is commonly associated with blunt or penetrating trauma and can result in thromboembolic event, cranial nerves palsies, rupture and hemorrhage. Due to the limited number of large studies, safety and efficacy of surgical and interventional management of ECPA is not well characterized. Open surgery with resection of pseudoaneurysm with end-to-end anastomosis or interposition graft is currently the preferred method of management. The aim of this study is to study the demographics, etiopathogenesis, presentation and outcome after surgical intervention of ECPA at our center. MethodsAll patients who underwent surgery for carotid pseudoaneurysm form June 2012 to December 2019, at Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery were included in this retrospective chart review study after evaluation of the hospital record book and electronic medical record. Patients who had stroke or cranial nerve injury before surgery, were excluded from this study. ResultsFifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. Male to female ratio was 11:4. Mean age of presentation was 38.17±18.98 years. All patients presented with tender and pulsatile neck swelling. Common carotid artery involvement was more common. Three patients suffered from stroke postoperatively, and all of these patients died, however, one patient with stroke died due to reasons not related to pseudoaneurysm. Two patients suffered cranial nerve injury and ten patients had no other disabling complications. ConclusionECPA is an uncommon but a serious disease and ischemic stroke after surgery is associated with high mortality.

Is Preoperative Embolization Necessary for Carotid Paraganglioma Resection: Experience of a Tertiary Center

Purpose: This study was designed to investigate whether preoperative embolization is a useful procedure to decrease blood loss and neurovascular complications for carotid body tumor (CBT) surgery or not. Methods: Medical records of our tertiary care center from 2012 to 2019 were scanned for patients who underwent surgery for CBT, retrospectively. Age, gender, complaint and head and neck examination findings at the time of presentation, preoperative complete blood count parameters, imaging records (cervical magnetic resonance imaging and carotid artery angiography), Shamblin classification, tumor size, intraoperative findings, and postoperative complications were noted. Results: A total of 26 patients were operated due to CBT between 2012 and 2019 in our clinic; preoperative arterial embolization was performed to 15 (57.7%) patients, and 11 (42.3%) patients were operated without embolization. Youngest patient was 24 years old, while oldest was 69 years and mean age was 44.35 ± 12.73. (embolization group: ages ranging between 24 and 64 with a mean of 41.5 ± 11.02 years; in nonembolization group: ages ranging between 26 and 69 with a mean of 48.1 ± 14.3). Embolization status was not significantly related to cranial nerve injury, vascular injury, overall complications, and hematocrit decrease. Arterial injury is more likely to occur with increasing Shamblin class ( r = .39; P = .04). Tumor size is not found to be significantly related to cranial nerve injury, vascular injury, overall complications, and hematocrit decrease, but cranial nerve injury and vascular injury were more likely to occur in large tumors ( r = .34; P = .089 and r = .34; P = .087, respectively). Age was significantly and negatively correlated to vascular injury ( r = −.51; P = .05). Vascular injury was significantly correlated with gender (male predominance: r = −.64; P = .000). Conclusion: Although preoperative arterial embolization is considered to attenuate the complication risk, we found that there was no significant difference among the patients with or without embolization.