competitive protein binding
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

409
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

45
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Asif ◽  
Sarah E Groboske ◽  
Edward K Y Leung ◽  
Kiang-Teck J Yeo ◽  
Xander M R van Wijk

Abstract Background The interest for vitamin D has exponentially increased testing demand for 25-hydroxy vitamin D [25(OH)D]. Consequently, many laboratories are switching from LC-MS/MS methods to automated, high-throughput immunoassays. One of the major potential issues with these assays has been the lack of cross-reactivity with 25(OH)D2. Methods We have evaluated the Roche Elecsys vitamin D total II assay for accuracy by comparing 79 patient samples with LC-MS/MS. The cross-reactivity for 25(OH)D2 was evaluated by analyzing samples with high 25(OH)D2 separately and estimating 25(OH)D2 recovery, as well as by spiking of 25(OH)D2. The assay was further evaluated for precision, linearity, sample type, and common interferences. Results There was mostly good agreement between the Elecsys and LC-MS/MS assays (Deming regression: y = 0.95x + 0.70), with an overall bias of 2.3% (−0.84 ng/mL). However, there were 6 out of 79 (7.6%) discordant samples. The Deming regression for samples with high 25(OH)D2 compared to LC-MS/MS showed similar slope and intercept (y = 0.97x − 1.1). The average recovery of 25(OH)D2 for these samples was 90%. The initial precision studies were in general agreement with the package insert, but long-term clinical use showed higher-than-claimed imprecision (11.7%–14.4% at 12 ng/mL and 6.9%–7.6% at 27 ng/mL; claimed: 7.2% and 5.0%, respectively). We observed 1 falsely high result in plasma, an issue previously addressed by Roche in a medical device correction. Conclusions The analytical performance of the Roche Vitamin D assay was acceptable, and the assay had a good cross-reactivity for 25(OH)D2.


Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 2593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-Long Wang ◽  
Jing Xie ◽  
Jian Liang ◽  
Geng-Ting Dong ◽  
Li-Sheng Ding ◽  
...  

We have developed a new competitive protein binding assay (CPBA) based on human serum albumin functionalized silicon dioxide nanoparticles (nano-SiO2-HSA) that can be used for naproxen determination in urine. Compared with a conventional multi-well reaction plate, nano-SiO2 with a high surface-area-to-volume ratio could be introduced as a stationary phase, markedly improving the analytical performance. Nano-SiO2-HSA and horseradish peroxidase-labeled-naproxen (HRP-naproxen) were prepared for the present CPBA method. In this study, a direct competitive binding to nano-SiO2-HSAwas performed between the free naproxen in the sample and HRP-naproxen. Thus, the catalytic color reactions were investigated on an HRP/3,3′5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB)/H2O2 system by the HRP-naproxen/nano-SiO2-HSA composite for quantitative measurement via an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. A series of validation experiments indicated that our proposed methods can be applied satisfactorily to the determination of naproxen in urine samples. As a proof of principle, the newly developed nano-CPBA method for the quantification of naproxen in urine can be expected to have the advantages of low costs, fast speed, high accuracy, and relatively simple instrument requirements. Our method could be capable of expanding the analytical applications of nanomaterials and of determining other small-molecule compounds from various biological samples.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 683-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian H. Hettiaratchi ◽  
Catherine Chou ◽  
Nicholas Servies ◽  
Johanna M. Smeekens ◽  
Albert Cheng ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Primeaux ◽  
Bradley Burton ◽  
Stephanie Shuey

Axitinib is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor indicated for advanced renal cell cancer after failure of one prior systemic therapy. We report a case where a patient receiving axitinib experienced a supratherapeutic INR soon after initiation of an age-appropriate warfarin dose. We propose two possible mechanisms for this interaction, including competitive protein binding and decreased metabolism. Close INR monitoring and dose adjustments of warfarin may be necessary in patients receiving concomitant axitinib and warfarin in order to decrease the risks associated with this interaction.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 451-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jos PM Wielders ◽  
Graeme F. Carter ◽  
Heike Eberl ◽  
Gary Morris ◽  
Heinz Jürgen Roth ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 326-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Serteser ◽  
Abdurrahman Coskun ◽  
Tamer C Inal ◽  
Ibrahim Unsal

Summary Vitamin D is an important determinant for the regulation of calcium and phosphorus levels and mineralization of the bone. The most reliable indicator of vitamin D status is the measurement of plasma or serum 25OH-D concentration. Several studies reported discrepancies between the results of assays. These high variabilities in 25OH-D measurements are due to used assay technologies and lack of standardization against the reference materials. Different assays have been employed for the measurement of 25OHD levels: Competitive Protein Binding Assays, immunoassays, direct detection methods. Choosing an assay platform is important both for clinical laboratory professionals and researchers, and several factors affect this process. Recently, liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry is an alternative method to traditional assays and provides higher specificity and sensitivity than many assays; therefore, it has been suggested as a candidate reference method for circulating 25OH-D3. Standardization of methods for the quantification of 25OH-D by using the human-based samples would reduce the inter-method variability. The best way for laboratories to demonstrate the accuracy of their results is by participating in the external quality assessment scheme. Standardization of the assays is also required to provide clinicians with the accurate tools to diagnose hypovitaminosis. In addition, assay-specific decision limits are needed to define appropriate thresholds of treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document