Lateral Thoracolumbar Listhesis as an Independent Predictor of Disability in Adult Scoliosis Patients: Multivariable Assessment Before and After Surgical Realignment

BACKGROUND Lateral (ie, coronal) vertebral listhesis may contribute to disability in adult scoliosis patients. OBJECTIVE To assess for a correlation between lateral listhesis and disability among patients with adult scoliosis. METHODS This was a retrospective multi-center analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients eligible for a minimum of 2-yr follow-up and with coronal plane deformity (defined as maximum Cobb angle ≥20º) were included (n = 724). Outcome measures were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and leg pain numeric scale rating. Lateral thoracolumbar listhesis was measured as the maximum vertebral listhesis as a percent of the superior endplate across T1-L5 levels. Linear and logistic regression was utilized, as appropriate. Multivariable analyses adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, maximum Cobb angle, and T1-PA. Minimally clinically important difference (MCID) in ODI was defined as 12.8. RESULTS In total, 724 adult patients were assessed. The mean baseline maximum lateral thoracolumbar listhesis was 18.3% (standard deviation 9.7%). The optimal statistical grouping for lateral listhesis was empirically determined to be none/mild (<6.7%), moderate (6.7-15.4%), and severe (≥15.4%). In multivariable analysis, listhesis of moderate and severe vs none/mild was associated with worse baseline ODI (none/mild = 33.7; moderate = 41.6; severe = 43.9; P < .001 for both comparisons) and leg pain NSR (none/mild = 2.9, moderate = 4.0, severe = 5.1, P < .05). Resolution of severe lateral listhesis to none/mild was independently associated with increased likelihood of reaching MCID in ODI at 2 yr postoperatively (odds ratio 2.1 95% confidence interval 1.2–3.7, P = .0097). CONCLUSION Lateral thoracolumbar listhesis is associated with worse baseline disability among adult scoliosis patients. Resolution of severe lateral listhesis following deformity correction was independently associated with increased likelihood of reaching MCID in ODI at 2-yr follow-up.

The Impact of Coronal Plane Deformity on Ankle Arthrodesis and Arthroplasty

Background: Ankle coronal plane deformity represents a complex 3-dimensional problem, and comparative data are lacking to guide treatment recommendations for optimal treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis with concomitant coronal plane deformity. Methods: In total, 224 patients treated for end-stage ankle arthritis were enrolled in an observational trial. Of 112 patients followed more than 2 years, 48 patients (19 arthrodesis, 29 arthroplasty) had coronal plane deformity and were compared to 64 patients without coronal plane deformity (18 arthrodesis, 46 arthroplasty) defined as greater than 10 degrees of varus or valgus. The arthroplasty implants used had different internal constraints to intracomponent coronal plane tilting. Patients completed Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA) and SF-36 preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Measures included change in SF-36 and MFA, as well as compared reoperation rates and pain scales. Results: For the groups with coronal plane ankle deformity, the median for the arthrodesis group was 19.0 degrees and the median for the arthroplasty group was 16.9 degrees. In the deformity cohort during the follow-up period, we had 7 major reoperations: 2 in the arthrodesis group and 5 in the arthroplasty group, all with the less constrained implant design. MFA, vitality, and social function of the SF-36 improved for all groups. Patients without preoperative deformities had greater improvement with fusion or replacement at both 2 and 3 years. There was no difference in improvement between those patients with coronal deformity who received arthroplasty vs arthrodesis. Conclusion: Patients with and without coronal plane deformity may benefit from ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis, although greater improvements may be expected in those without preoperative deformity. In this study, at final follow-up of 3 years, overall we found no meaningful difference in patient-reported outcomes between the patients with preoperative coronal plane deformities whether they had a fusion or a replacement as treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis. Level of Evidence: II, comparative study.

Characterizing the Magnitude of and Risk Factors for Functional Limb Lengthening in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background: There is little data on the magnitude and factors for functional leg lengthening after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Questions/Purpose: We sought to determine the incidence of and risk factors for functional leg lengthening after primary TKA. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive unilateral primary TKAs at a single institution from 2015 to 2018. Of the 782 TKAs included, 430 (55%) were performed in women; the mean age was 66 years, and the mean body mass index was 29 kg/m2. Preoperatively, 541 (69%) knees were varus deformities and 223 (29%) were valgus deformities. Hip to ankle biplanar radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively for all patients. Two independent researchers measured leg length, coronal plane deformity, lateral knee flexion angle, and overall mechanical alignment on all preoperative and postoperative radiographs. Results: The mean overall ipsilateral functional leg lengthening was 7.0 mm. Seven hundred knees (90%) were overall functionally lengthened, including 462 (59%) knees lengthened >5 mm and 250 (31%) knees lengthened 10 mm or more. A valgus deformity and coronal plane deformity of 10° or more were significant risk factors for increased functional lengthening. Patients with severe valgus deformities (>10°) had the largest amount of functional lengthening, at a mean of 13.5 mm. Conclusion: After primary TKA, 90% of limbs are functionally lengthened, including roughly one-third over a centimeter. Valgus knee deformities and severe deformities (>10°) were significant risk factors for increased limb lengthening.

A Cadaveric Anatomical Study of the Relationship between Proximal Tibial Slope and Coronal Plane Deformity

Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and posterior proximal tibial angle (PPTA) are commonly used to characterize the geometry of proximal tibia and are important considerations in lower extremity realignment procedures and total knee arthroplasty. This study utilized a large cadaveric collection to explore relationships between tibial slope and coronal plane deformity of the tibia. We utilized 462 well-preserved skeletons (924 tibiae), excluding any with fracture or obvious rheumatologic or infectious findings. Custom cards were made with different sized arcs on the bottom surface, so that they could rest on the anterior and posterior aspects of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus of each bone to measure PPTA. Previously measured MPTA values for the same bones were also utilized. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine relationship between MPTA and medial and lateral PPTAs. The mean age was 56 ± 10 years, with 13% female and 31% African American (remainder Caucasian). The mean MPTA was 87.2 ± 2.4 degrees. The mean medial plateau PPTA was 81.5 ± 3.8 degrees and mean lateral plateau PPTA was 81.3 ± 3.7 degrees. Regression analysis found that MPTA was significantly associated with both medial and lateral PPTAs (standardized betas 0.197 and 0.146, respectively, p < 0.0005 for both). There was a significant correlation between lateral and medial PPTAs (r = 0.435, p = 0.03). The clinical significance of these findings warrants further investigation and emphasizes the importance of carefully assessing the sagittal plane when planning reconstruction of a tibia with varus or valgus deformity, particularly high tibial osteotomies.