Transcriptomic and Lipidomic Profiles in Nasal Polyps of Glucocorticoid Responders and Non-Responders: Before and After Treatment

Background: The pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and mechanisms underlying different responses to systemic glucocorticoids (GC) remain unclear. The major aim of this study was to explore the transcriptomic and oxidative lipidomic signatures and the effects of GC in patients with different clinical responses.Methods: Nasal polyp biopsies were obtained before and after 14-day oral GC treatment from 16 patients with CRSwNP, and normal nasal mucosa specimens were collected from 12 control subjects. RNA sequencing and oxidative lipidomics were performed, and differential gene expression analysis was conducted in the Responder and Non-responder groups at baseline and after treatment.Results: In the Responder group, GC significantly improved clinical symptoms and reduced tissue eosinophil infiltration. Meanwhile, GC led to a pronounced transcriptomic reversion with robust suppression of inflammatory responses and abnormal metabolism of extracellular matrix, as well as restoration of cilia function. However, non-responders were mainly characterized by epithelial hyperplasia and keratinization, with much less transcriptomic improvement after GC treatment. Higher expression of type 2 inflammatory molecules (CCL13, IGHE, CCL18, CCL23, CCR3, and CLC) with lower levels of LACRT, PPDPFL, DES, C6, MUC5B, and SCGB3A1 were related to a stronger clinical response to GC. Besides decreased prostaglandins and increased leukotrienes, increased dysregulation in other oxylipid mediators derived from polyunsaturated fatty acids was determined in nasal polyps, which was ameliorated by GC treatment.Conclusion: Systemic GC exert anti-inflammatory effects, improve tissue remodeling, restore cilia function, and ameliorate dysregulation of oxylipid mediator pathway in CRSwNP. GC-responders exhibited different transcriptomic signatures from non-responders.

Adalimumab in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease Refractory to Conventional Therapy

Background: No study explores the effectiveness of adalimumab in sight-threatening Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) patients in China.Objective: To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with sight-threatening Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease refractory to conventional therapy.Methods: Medical records of VKH patients who had been treated with systemic glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants but whose condition was poorly controlled were collected and analyzed. Primary outcomes comprised of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular inflammation, relapses, and glucocorticoid-sparing effects. Other outcomes included central macular thickness (CMT), intraocular manifestations and adverse events (AEs).Results: Nine refractory VKH patients with a median age of 30 (16, 43) years old were enrolled in this study and received treatment for a median of 10 (7, 11) months. Mean BCVA improved from LogMar 0.63 ± 0.50 (20/72 or 0.36 ± 0.26 in Snellen chart) at baseline to LogMar 0.50 ± 0.37 (20/82 or 0.41 ± 0.28 in Snellen chart) at final visit (P = 0.090). The anterior chamber cell grade decreased from 2 (1.75, 3)+ at baseline to 0.5 (0, 1.25)+ cell at final visit (P < 0.001). The vitritis grade decreased from 1 (1, 1) + cell at baseline to 0 (0, 1)+ cell at final visit (P < 0.001). Patients suffered a median of 1 (0, 2) relapse during treatment. CMT remained stable from 238.50 ± 144.94 μm at baseline to 219.28 ± 77.20 μm at final visit (P = 0.553). The mean prednisone dosage decreased from 21.91 ± 18.39 mg/d to 2.73 ± 4.10 mg/d (P = 0.005). No severe AEs were found during treatment.Conclusions: The outcomes indicated that ADA was an effective and safe option for VKH patients refractory to conventional therapy by controlling inflammation, preserving visual function and reducing the daily glucocorticoid dose.

Clinical and morphological phenotypes in intrathoracic sarcoidosis

Aim. To study clinical and morphological phenotypes in different variants of the course of intrathoracic sarcoidosis and isolate new phenotypes.Materials and methods. The study included 121 patients with intrathoracic sarcoidosis aged 21–66 years (50.4% were men, 49.6% were women, the average age at the time of the disease onset was 38 years) over the period 2007– 2019. During the examination, patients’ complaints were studied thoroughly, and the diagnosis was histologically verified in all cases. During an extended histological examination, the quantitative and qualitative composition of biopsy specimens was investigated. The number of granulomas in the field of vision and the content of giant cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils in them were studied. Qualitative parameters were assessed for the presence of hyalinosis, Schaumann bodies, necrosis, stamping, calcification, fibrosis, and vasculitis. All patients were retrospectively divided into two clinical groups depending on the outcomes of the disease: group 1 included patients with a favorable course of sarcoidosis, proceeding without relapses and signs of progression; group 2 encompassed patients with an unfavorable course of the disease with relapses and progression, requiring long-term administration of systemic glucocorticoids.Results. The analysis showed that among all general clinical manifestations, only the presence of dyspnea, skin manifestations, and weight loss occurred significantly more often in the patients with an unfavorable course of intrathoracic sarcoidosis (р = 0.04; 0.02; and 0.01, respectively). Among morphological parameters, a large number of macrophages was significantly more frequent in the biopsy specimens in this group of patients (р < 0.01).

Incidence and factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Colombia during the COVID-19 pandemic v1

Introduction:Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to intrinsic characteristics of the pathology and the medications used to treat it. Objective: To evaluate the incidence of and factors related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with RA in Colombia. Materials and methods: This was an observational study of patients diagnosed with RA who were treated at a health care institution in Colombia. The study evaluated whether the patients presented SARS-CoV-2 infection and other clinical variables. Variables associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. Results: A total of 2,566 patients with RA were identified. They had a median age of 61.9 years, and 81.1% were women. They were mainly treated with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (85.3%), glucocorticoids (52.2%) and biological DMARDs (26.8%). The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 5.1%, and the factors that increased the risk included treatment with synthetic DMARDs with or without biological DMARDs but with concomitant systemic glucocorticoids (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.21-3.93 and OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.05-2.74, respectively) and receiving antidiabetic drugs (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 1.27-3.94). A total of 20.8% of patients with COVID-19 required hospitalization, and 3.8% died. Conclusions: The incidence of COVID-19 is higher among patients with RA who receive DMARDs and glucocorticoids simultaneously or who have diabetes mellitus than among RA patients not receiving these drug combinations, which should guide treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of a budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy regimen in mild-moderate asthma: A randomised controlled trial

<p>Background Inhaled corticosteroids taken regularly reduce exacerbation risk in patients with mild asthma. In clinical practice however, adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor and the burden of disease from exacerbations is substantive. In this thesis I explore an alternative approach, that of an inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol combination used as sole reliever therapy, that potentially overcomes the problem of poor adherence. I report the results of my research, known as the PeRsonalised Asthma Combination Therapy: with Inhaled Corticosteroid And fast-onset Long acting beta agonist (PRACTICAL) study. Research aims To investigate the efficacy and safety of as-needed budesonide/formoterol, an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/fast-onset long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combination, as compared with maintenance budesonide (ICS) plus as-needed terbutaline, a short-acting beta-agonist (SABA), in adult patients with mild-moderate asthma. Methods This research was performed as a 52-week, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III randomised controlled trial of adults aged 18-75 with mild to moderate asthma using SABA for symptom relief, with or without low to moderate doses of maintenance ICS in the previous 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either: (i) budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler, an ICS/fast-onset LABA, 200/6 micrograms (μg), one inhalation as needed for relief of symptoms, or (ii) budesonide Turbuhaler, an ICS, 200µg, one inhalation twice daily, plus terbutaline Turbuhaler, a SABA, 250µg, two inhalations as needed. Participants and investigators were not masked to group assignment. Participants were seen for six study visits: randomisation, and at weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52. The primary outcome was rate of severe exacerbations per patient per year, with severe exacerbations defined as the use of systemic glucocorticoids for at least three days because of asthma, or a hospitalisation or emergency department visit because of asthma requiring systemic glucocorticoids. Findings Between May 4, 2016 and Dec 22, 2017, 890 participants were assigned to treatment. The analysis included 885 of 890 randomised participants; 437 assigned to budesonide/formoterol as needed and 448 to budesonide maintenance plus terbutaline as needed. 70% of participants were using ICS at entry. The annualised severe exacerbation rate was lower with as-needed budesonide/formoterol than with maintenance budesonide (absolute rate 0.119 vs 0.172; relative rate, 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 1.00]; p=0.049). The Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score with budesonide/formoterol was not significantly different from budesonide maintenance (mean difference, 0.06; 95% CI -0.005 to 0.12). Conclusion This research has demonstrated that in adults with mild to moderate asthma in the real-world setting, budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy was more effective at preventing severe exacerbations than maintenance low-dose budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline without a clinically important worsening in asthma control. The evidence presented in this thesis supports the 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendation that inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol reliever therapy is an alternative regimen to maintenance low-dose inhaled corticosteroid and SABA reliever for the prevention of severe exacerbations for patients with mild to moderate asthma.</p>

Efficacy and safety of a budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy regimen in mild-moderate asthma: A randomised controlled trial

<p>Background Inhaled corticosteroids taken regularly reduce exacerbation risk in patients with mild asthma. In clinical practice however, adherence to inhaled corticosteroids is poor and the burden of disease from exacerbations is substantive. In this thesis I explore an alternative approach, that of an inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol combination used as sole reliever therapy, that potentially overcomes the problem of poor adherence. I report the results of my research, known as the PeRsonalised Asthma Combination Therapy: with Inhaled Corticosteroid And fast-onset Long acting beta agonist (PRACTICAL) study. Research aims To investigate the efficacy and safety of as-needed budesonide/formoterol, an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/fast-onset long-acting beta agonist (LABA) combination, as compared with maintenance budesonide (ICS) plus as-needed terbutaline, a short-acting beta-agonist (SABA), in adult patients with mild-moderate asthma. Methods This research was performed as a 52-week, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase III randomised controlled trial of adults aged 18-75 with mild to moderate asthma using SABA for symptom relief, with or without low to moderate doses of maintenance ICS in the previous 12 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either: (i) budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler, an ICS/fast-onset LABA, 200/6 micrograms (μg), one inhalation as needed for relief of symptoms, or (ii) budesonide Turbuhaler, an ICS, 200µg, one inhalation twice daily, plus terbutaline Turbuhaler, a SABA, 250µg, two inhalations as needed. Participants and investigators were not masked to group assignment. Participants were seen for six study visits: randomisation, and at weeks 4, 16, 28, 40 and 52. The primary outcome was rate of severe exacerbations per patient per year, with severe exacerbations defined as the use of systemic glucocorticoids for at least three days because of asthma, or a hospitalisation or emergency department visit because of asthma requiring systemic glucocorticoids. Findings Between May 4, 2016 and Dec 22, 2017, 890 participants were assigned to treatment. The analysis included 885 of 890 randomised participants; 437 assigned to budesonide/formoterol as needed and 448 to budesonide maintenance plus terbutaline as needed. 70% of participants were using ICS at entry. The annualised severe exacerbation rate was lower with as-needed budesonide/formoterol than with maintenance budesonide (absolute rate 0.119 vs 0.172; relative rate, 0.69 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48 to 1.00]; p=0.049). The Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score with budesonide/formoterol was not significantly different from budesonide maintenance (mean difference, 0.06; 95% CI -0.005 to 0.12). Conclusion This research has demonstrated that in adults with mild to moderate asthma in the real-world setting, budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy was more effective at preventing severe exacerbations than maintenance low-dose budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline without a clinically important worsening in asthma control. The evidence presented in this thesis supports the 2019 Global Initiative for Asthma recommendation that inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol reliever therapy is an alternative regimen to maintenance low-dose inhaled corticosteroid and SABA reliever for the prevention of severe exacerbations for patients with mild to moderate asthma.</p>

Nefecon (targeted-release formulation-budesonide) for the treatment of IgA nephropathy

Budesonide is a second-generation synthetic, nonhalogenated corticosteroid; it acts locally with minimal systemic absorption. The oral formulation Nefecon® is under clinical development from the treatment of IgA nephropathy. Thanks to its specific formulation, it could inhibit the pathogenetic process of IgA nephropathy at its source while avoiding the toxicity of systemic glucocorticoids. A Phase II clinical trial has shown a statistically significant antiproteinuric effect of budesonide on top of therapy with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin system, with a good safety profile. More recently, preliminary results of a larger, Phase III clinical trial have confirmed the antiproteinuric efficacy of oral budesonide. These findings were submitted to the US FDA and the EMA to undergo fast revision and approval for clinical use.

Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection site: best practice guidelines

The article presents modern recommendations for the use of systemic administration of glucocorticoids. It is indicated that there is a clear tendency to minimize the doses and timing of the appointment of systemic glucocorticoids in rheumatoid arthritis, and in seronegative spondyloarthropathies (ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis), in accordance with both foreign and domestic recommendations, systemic therapy with glucocorticoids is not carried out. It is emphasized that at the present stage, the role of local administration of glucocorticoids will increase as an effective way to reduce the activity of arthritis in any nosologically form. The mechanisms of action of locally administered glucocorticoids leading to anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects are described. The comparative characteristics of locally administered glucocorticoids with different duration of action according to their effectiveness and safety are presented. Predictors of the effectiveness of local therapy with glucocorticoids are described. The data on the evaluation of the duration of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of various local glucocorticoids, including in comparison with the intra-articular administration of hyaluronic acid preparations, which showed the advantages of betamethasone over triamcinolone acetate, are presented. The differences in the crystal structure of betamethasone and triamcinolone acetate are described. It is indicated that the 2.5-fold smaller size of betamethasone crystals compared to triamcinolone acetate crystals and the absence of betamethasone crystals makes it possible to use betamethasone in the treatment of inflammatory processes in periarticular tissues, as well as in crystalline arthritis (gout, pseudogout). The data on the safety of the use of intra-articular injection of glucocorticoids are presented. It is indicated that the registration in the Russian Federation of a new form of betamethasone in pre-filled syringes makes it even more possible to avoid infectious complications of this type of therapy. Rare cases of complications of local therapy with glucocorticoids are described.

Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Moderate-to-Severe Bullous Pemphigoid

BackgroundBullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disorder that predominantly affects the elderly. As the main treatment for BP, systemic corticosteroids are often limited by their side effects. Safer treatment modalities are therefore needed. Dupilumab is a biologic agent used to treat BP in recent years.MethodsMedical records of patients with moderate-to-severe BP were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-four patients were included (follow-up period: 32 weeks), eight of whom received dupilumab in combination with methylprednisolone and azathioprine (dupilumab group) while the other 16 patients received methylprednisolone and azathioprine (conventional group). Response to dupilumab was evaluated by comparison of several parameters (time to stop new blister formation, time to reduce the systemic glucocorticoids to minimal dose, and total amount of methylprednisolone).ResultsThe median age of patients in the dupilumab and conventional groups were 64.50 years (range: 22–90 years) and 64.50 years (range: 17–86 years), respectively. The median duration of disease before admission in the dupilumab group was 2 months (range: 1–240 months) and 2.5 months (range: 1–60 months) in the conventional group. The median time to stop new blister formation was 8 days (range: 1–13 days) and 12 days (range: 5–21 days) in patients of the dupilumab and conventional groups, respectively (p = 0.028 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). In addition, the median time to reduce the systemic glucocorticoids to minimal dose (methylprednisolone 0.08 mg/kg/day) was 121.5 and 148.5 days for the dupilumab and conventional therapy groups, respectively (p = 0.0053 by Kaplan-Meier analysis). The median total amount of methylprednisolone (at the time of reaching the minimal dose) used in the dupilumab group was 1,898 mg (range: 1,624–2,932 mg) while the cumulative dose of conventional group was 2,344 mg (range: 1,708–4,744 mg) (p = 0.036 by Mann-Whitney U test). The median total amount of azathioprine (at the time of reaching the minimal dose) used in dupilumab group was 8,300 mg (range: 7,100–10,400 mg) while the total dose of conventional group was 10,300 mg (range: 8,900–14,400 mg) (p = 0.0048 by Mann-Whitney U test). No adverse event related to dupilumab was recorded.ConclusionsDupilumab in addition to methylprednisolone and azathioprine seems superior to methylprednisolone/azathioprine alone in controlling disease progression and accelerating the tapering of glucocorticoids.