197 Angio-based index of microcirculatory resistance for the assessment of the coronary resistance: a proof of concept study

Aims The study of coronary microcirculation has gained increasing consideration and importance in cath-lab. Despite the increase of evidence its use still remains very limited. QFR is a novel angio-based approach for the evaluation of coronary stenosis. The aim of our study was to use the QFR assessment in stable patients to recreate the IMR formula and to correlate the result of the two techniques. Methods and results From 1 June 2019 to 29 February 2019, 200 patients with CCS and indication of coronary artery angiography and referred to the cath-lab of the University Hospital of Ferrara (Italy) were enrolled. After baseline coronary angiogram, quantitative flow ratio, fractional flow reserve and index of microcirculatory resistance evaluation were performed. Pearson correlation (r) between Angio-based index of microcirculatory resistance (A-IMR) and IMR 0.32 with R2 = 0.098, P = 0.03: McNemar test showed a difference between the two test of 6.82% with 95% CI from −12.05% to 22.89%, which is not significant (P = 0.60). Bland and Altman plot showed a mean difference of 23.3 (from −26.5 to 73.1). Sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were 70%, 83.3%, 75% and 70% for A-IMR value > 44.2. The area under the ROC curve for A-IMR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.61–0.88, P = 0.0003). Conclusions We have validated for the first time the formula of the A-IMR, a tool for the calculation of microvascular resistance which does not require the use of pressure guides and the induction of hyperemia

The COronary and MICrocirculatory measurements in patients with Aortic valve Stenosis (COMIC-AS) study: Rationale and design

Objective: Although coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), hemodynamic assessment of CAD severity in patients undergoing valve replacement for severe AS is challenging. Myocardial hypertrophic remodelling interferes with coronary blood flow and may influence the values of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and non-hyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). The aim is to investigate these effects on current CAD indices by comparing intra-coronary hemodynamics prior to, immediately after and six months after aortic valve replacement (AVR), when it is expected that microvascular function has improved. Furthermore, we will compare FFR and Resting Full Cycle Ratio (RFR) with myocardial perfusion SPECT as indicators of myocardial ischemia in patients with AS and CAD. Study design: One hundred patients with AS and CAD will be prospectively included. Patients will undergo pre-AVR SPECT and intra-coronary hemodynamic assessment at baseline, immediately after and six months after AVR. The primary endpoint is the change in FFR. Secondary endpoints include the acute change of FFR after TAVR, the diagnostic accuracy of FFR versus RFR compared with SPECT for the assessment of ischemia, changes in microvascular function as assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and the effect of these changes on FFR.Conclusion: The present study will evaluate intra-coronary physiology before, immediately after and six months after AVR in patients with AS and intermediate coronary stenosis. The understanding of the impact of AVR on the assessment of FFR, NHPR and microvascular function may help guide the need for revascularization in these patients.

The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Predicts Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is a simple method that can measure microvascular function after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). This study is to find out whether IMR predicts clinical long-term outcomes in STEMI patients. A total of 316 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI from 2005 to 2015 were enrolled. The IMR was measured using pressure sensor/thermistor-tipped guidewire after primary PCI. The primary endpoint was the rate of death or hospitalization for heart failure (HF) over a mean follow-up period of 65 months. The mean corrected IMR was 29.4 ± 20.0. Patients with an IMR > 29 had a higher rate of the primary endpoint compared to patients with an IMR ≤ 29 (10.3% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.001). During the follow-up period, 13 patients (4.1%) died and 6 patients (1.9%) were hospitalized for HF. An IMR > 29 was associated with an increased risk of death or hospitalization for HF (OR 5.378, p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, IMR > 29 (OR 3.962, p = 0.022) remained an independent predictor of death or hospitalization for HF with age (OR 1.048, p = 0.049) and symptom-to-balloon time (OR 1.002, p = 0.049). High IMR was an independent predictor for poor long-term clinical outcomes in STEMI patients after primary PCI.