tumor bed boost
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

94
(FIVE YEARS 22)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Stefan Dietzsch ◽  
Annett Braesigk ◽  
Clemens Seidel ◽  
Julia Remmele ◽  
Ralf Kitzing ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) for tumor bed boost (TB) in non-metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) was not mandatory but was recommended for patients enrolled in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial between 2014 and 2018. This individual case review (ICR) analysis aimed to evaluate types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and develop uniform review criteria for TB boost. Patients and methods A total of 78 patients were registered in this trial, of whom a subgroup of 65 patients were available for evaluation of the TB treatment plans. Dose uniformity was evaluated according to the definitions of the protocol. Additional RT-QC criteria for standardized review of target contours were elaborated and data evaluated accordingly. Results Of 65 initial TB plan proposals, 27 (41.5%) revealed deviations of target volume delineation. Deviations according to the dose uniformity criteria were present in 14 (21.5%) TB plans. In 25 (38.5%) cases a modification of the RT plan was recommended. Rejection of the TB plans was rather related to unacceptable target volume delineation than to insufficient dose uniformity. Conclusion In this analysis of pretreatment RT-QC, protocol deviations were present in a high proportion of initial TB plan proposals. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for MB. Based on these data, a proposal for RT-QC criteria for tumor bed boost in non-metastatic MB was developed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. S907
Author(s):  
T. Wadasadawala ◽  
J. Manjali ◽  
G. Chitkara ◽  
R. Pathak ◽  
P. Thakkar ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S45
Author(s):  
A. Pandey ◽  
U. Shahi ◽  
L.M. Aggarwal ◽  
S. Choudhary ◽  
S. Singh

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-309
Author(s):  
Kannan Periasamy ◽  
Gunaseelan Karunanithi ◽  
Shamsudheen Cholayil ◽  
Kadambari Dharanipragada ◽  
Vijayprabhu Neelakanadan

Chirurgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 116 (200) ◽  
pp. S110
Author(s):  
Liviu Stoleru ◽  
Smaranda Stoleru ◽  
Bogdan Gaspar ◽  
Aniela Noditi ◽  
Alexandru Blidaru

2021 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-280
Author(s):  
Martin C. Tom ◽  
Sarah M.C. Sittenfeld ◽  
Chirag Shah ◽  
Kristine Bauer-Nilsen ◽  
Rahul Tendulkar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii336-iii336
Author(s):  
Girish Dhall ◽  
Shengjie Wu ◽  
Arzu Onar-Thomas ◽  
Dennis Shaw ◽  
Shannon MacDonald ◽  
...  

Abstract ACNS1123 was a Children’s Oncology Group Phase 2 study that was undertaken to determine whether irradiation could be safely reduced without impacting survival in a subgroup of NGGCT patients. Between May 2012-Jan 2017, 107 eligible patients were accrued to Stratum 1 (NGGCT stratum). Sixty-six (61.7%) patients achieved a complete/partial response (CR/PR) to induction chemotherapy and received 30.6Gy whole ventricular field irradiation followed by 54Gy tumor-bed boost achieving a 2-year progression-free survival rate of 89% (95% CI:81%-97%) and overall survival rate of 92% (95% CI:86%- 99%). Eight patients progressed; 6 had a spinal relapse and 2 patients had a local plus spinal relapse. Seven of eight patients had marker elevation at relapse and data was not available in one patient. At diagnosis, location was pineal in six cases, suprasellar in one, and bifocal in one case. Four patients had beta HCGβ and AFP elevation and two each had HCGβ and AFP elevation alone at diagnosis. Only two patients had HCGβ or AFP >1000 (HCGβ 3550 in one patient and AFP of 1340 in another). All eight patients were CR by markers; four had radiographic CR and four had a PR. Five patients had surgery at diagnosis: two had embryonal carcinoma, one germinoma, and two mixed germ cell tumor with malignant elements on histology. A consistent significant risk factor could not be identified to explain excess of spinal failures seen in our cohort.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (31) ◽  
pp. 3604-3614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Lian Wang ◽  
Hui Fang ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Yong-Wen Song ◽  
Wei-Hu Wang ◽  
...  

PURPOSE No randomized trials have compared hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) after breast-conserving surgery in the Asian population. This study aimed to determine whether a 3.5-week schedule of HFRT is noninferior to a standard 6-week schedule of CFRT in China. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients from 4 Chinese institutions who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and had T1-2N0-3 invasive breast cancers participated this study. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using a computer-generated central randomization schedule, without stratification, to receive whole-breast irradiation with or without nodal irradiation, followed by tumor-bed boost, either at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks with a boost of 10 Gy in five fractions over 1 week (CFRT) or 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks with a boost of 8.7 Gy in three daily fractions (HFRT). The primary endpoint was 5-year local recurrence (LR), and a 5% margin of 5-year LR was used to establish noninferiority. RESULTS Between August 2010 and November 2015, 734 patients were assigned to the HFRT (n = 368) or CFRT (n = 366) group. At a median follow-up of 73.5 months (interquartile range, 60.5-91.4 months), the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 1.2% in the HFRT group and 2.0% in the CFRT group (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.88; P = .017 for noninferiority). There were no significant differences in acute and late toxicities, except that the HFRT group had less grade 2-3 acute skin toxicity than the CFRT group ( P = .019). CONCLUSION CFRT and HFRT with a tumor-bed boost may have similar low LR and toxicity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document