Kuala Lumpur train collision during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background Two city trains collided in an underground tunnel on 24 May 2021 at the height of COVID-19 pandemic near the Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, immediately after the evening rush hours. We aim to evaluate the management of this mass casualty incident highlighting the lessons learned to be used in preparedness for similar incidents that may occur in other major cities worldwide. Methods Information regarding incident site and hospital management response were analysed. Data on demography, triaging, injuries and hospital management of patients were collected according to a designed protocol. Challenges, difficulties and their solutions were reported. Results The train's emergency response team (ERT) has shut down train movements towards the incident site. Red zone (in the tunnel), yellow zone (the station platform) and green zone (outside the station entrance) were established. The fire and rescue team arrived and assisted the ERT in the red zone. Incident command system was established at the site. Medical base station was established at the yellow zone. Two hundred and fourteen passengers were in the trains. Sixty-four of them were injured. They had a median (range) ISS of 2 (1–43), and all were sent to Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL). Six (9.4%) patients were clinically triaged as red (critical), 19 (29.7%) as yellow (semi-critical) and 39 (60.9%) as green (non-critical). HKL's disaster plan was activated. All patients underwent temperature and epidemiology link assessment. Seven (10.9%) patients were admitted to the hospital (3 to the ICU, 3 to the ward and 1 to a private hospital as requested by the patient), while the rest 56 (87.5%) were discharged home. Six (9.4%) needed surgery. The COVID-19 tests were conducted on seven patients (10.9%) and were negative. There were no deaths. Conclusions The mass casualty incident was handled properly because of a clear standard operating procedure, smooth coordination between multi-agencies and the hospitals, presence of a 'binary' system for 'COVID-risk' and 'non-COVID-risk' areas, and the modifications of the existing disaster plan. Preparedness for MCIs is essential during pandemics.

Kuala Lumpur Train Collision During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background: Two city trains collided in an underground tunnel on 24th May 2021 at the height of Covid-19 pandemic near the Petronas Towers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia immediately after the evening rush hours. We aim to evaluate the management of this mass casualty incident highlighting the lessons learned to be used in preparedness for similar incidents that may occur in other major cities worldwide. Methods: Information regarding incident site and hospital management response were analysed. Data on demography, triaging, injuries and hospital management of patients were collected according to a designed protocol. Challenges, difficulties and their solutions were reported. Results: The train's emergency response team (ERT) has shut down train movements towards the incident site. Red zone (in the tunnel), yellow zone (the station platform) and green zone (outside the station entrance) were established. The fire and rescue team arrived and assisted the ERT in the red zone. Incident command system was established at the site. Medical base station was established at the yellow zone. 214 passengers were in the trains. 64 of them were injured. They had a median (range) ISS of 2 (1-43) and all were sent to Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL). Six (9.4%) patients were clinically triaged as red (critical), 19 (29.7%) as yellow (semi-critical) and 39 (60.9%) as green (non-critical). HKL's disaster plan was activated. All patients underwent temperature and epidemiology link assessment. Seven (10.9 %) patients were admitted to the hospital (3 to the ICU, 3 to the ward, and 1 to a private hospital as requested by the patient), while the rest 56 (87.5%) (56) were discharged home. Six (9.4%) needed surgery. The Covid-19 tests were conducted on seven patients (10.9%) and was negative There were no deaths. Conclusions: The mass casualty incident was handled properly because of a clear standard operating procedure, smooth coordination between multi-agencies and the hospitals, presence of a'binary' system for 'Covid risk' and 'non-Covid risk' areas, and the modifications of the existing disaster plan. Preparedness for MCIs is essential during pandemics.

The Evaluation of Responses and Abilities of 119 EMTs to Perform Pediatric Triage

This study aimed to evaluate the pediatric triage performance of 119 Emergency Medicine Technologists (EMTs) at a fire station, based on mass casualty incident scenarios of a pediatric disaster, and to evaluate effective measures of response. EMTs (N = 58) at a provincial fire station participated in this study and were asked to complete three questionnaires: one ‘general characteristics’ questionnaire, one problem solving questionnaire, consisting of questions based on mass casualty incident scenarios, and a post-questionnaire to explore the necessity of pediatric triage based on their responses. We used SPSS to analyze the data. The EMT-paramedics’ scores were high and statistically significant (p < .002). All 48 questions concerning the three scenarios were converted to a score ranging from 0 to 100 with an average score of 70.92 and an average correct response rate of 70%. We also found that the participants’ rate of recognition of the pediatric triage tool was significantly lower than that of the adult tool (p < .030). The usage rate was also low, at approximately 19.09%. After solving the questionnaire problems, the respondents reported a significantly higher score concerning the necessity of the pediatric triage tools than before (p < .006). Firefighting departments integrate pediatric triage tools into the E-triage system. However, EMTs should receive continuous training and practice to improve their pediatric triage tool classification capabilities.

Comparison of Outcome Tools Used to Test Mass-Casualty Algorithms in the Pediatric Population

Introduction: Mass-casualty incident (MCI) algorithms are used to sort large numbers of patients rapidly into four basic categories based on severity. To date, there is no consensus on the best method to test the accuracy of an MCI algorithm in the pediatric population, nor on the agreement between different tools designed for this purpose. Study Objective: This study is to compare agreement between the Criteria Outcomes Tool (COT) to previously published outcomes tools in assessing the triage category applied to a simulated set of pediatric MCI patients. Methods: An MCI triage category (black, red, yellow, and green) was applied to patients from a pre-collected retrospective cohort of pediatric patients under 14 years of age brought in as a trauma activation to a Level I trauma center from July 2010 through November 2013 using each of the following outcome measures: COT, modified Baxt score, modified Baxt combined with mortality and/or length-of-stay (LOS), ambulatory status, mortality alone, and Injury Severity Score (ISS). Descriptive statistics were applied to determine agreement between tools. Results: A total of 247 patients were included, ranging from 25 days to 13 years of age. The outcome of mortality had 100% agreement with the COT black. The “modified Baxt positive and alive” outcome had the highest agreement with COT red (65%). All yellow outcomes had 47%-53% agreement with COT yellow. “Modified Baxt negative and <24 hours LOS” had the highest agreement with the COT green at 89%. Conclusions: Assessment of algorithms for triaging pediatric MCI patients is complicated by the lack of a gold standard outcome tool and variability between existing measures.

An armed assailant in our hospital: Are we prepared?

ABSTRACT While armed assailant attacks are rare in the hospital setting, they pose a potential risk to healthcare staff, patients, visitors and the infrastructure. Singapore hospitals have well-developed disaster plans to respond to a mass casualty incident occurring outside the hospital. However, lack of an armed assailant incident response plan can significantly reduce the hospital’s ability to appropriately respond to such an incident. The authors describe various strategies that can be adopted in the development of an armed assailant incident response plan. Regular staff training will increase staff resilience and capability to respond to a potential threat in the future. The aim of this article is to highlight the need for the emergency preparedness units of all hospitals to work together with various stakeholders to develop an armed assailant incident response plan. This will be of great benefit for keeping healthcare facilities safe, both for staff as well as for the community. Keywords: Armed assailant, hospital, preparedness, response, strategies