The usage and outcomes of dextran in the treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis

Objectives In this study, we retrospectively compared the outcomes of patients with acute deep vein thrombosis treated with dextran 40 infusion and unfractionated heparin with those of patients treated with unfractionated heparin alone. Methods We evaluated 104 patients with the diagnosis of acute deep vein thrombosis. The pain complaints of the patients at the time of admission and the pain complaints in the calf with dorsiflexion of the foot were evaluated with the visual analogue pain scale, and the calf diameter of affected limbs was measured. Fifty five patients had dextran 40 infusion and unfractionated heparin treatment concomitantly (Group HD), while 49 patients had unfractionated heparin treatment (Group H). Heparin dose was adjusted to obtain 1.5- to 2.5-fold of normal activated partial thromboplastin time in both groups. Oral anticoagulant, warfarin sodium, was administered in the first day and resumed. Unfractionated heparin infusion therapy was resumed until international normalized ratio values of 2–2.5 were obtained. Dextran 40 infusion therapy was administered for 3 days. Calf diameters, current pain, and calf pain at foot dorsiflexion were recorded at 48 h and 72 h. 65 patients were distal, and 39 patients were proximal and popliteal acute DVT. None of the patients had phlegmasia. All were acute DVT. Results At 48 and 72 h of therapy, it was determined that the decrease of the calf diameter and the pain were more significant both at 48th and 72nd hours in the Group HD. The calf circumference change, especially at 72 h, was 2.58 ± 0.39 cm in the group receiving heparin + dextran, while it was 1.76 ± 0.56 cm in the group receiving only heparin. ( p = 0.000). While there were only 1.24 ± 1.02 people in the group that received dextran at 72 h, leg pain persisted in 3.35 ± 1.11 people in the other group. ( p = 0.000). Evaluation was made only with calf vein diameter measurement. When patients with Homan’s sign were evaluated for their calf pain at foot dorsiflexion; both groups had decreased pain at 48th and 72nd hours. Conclusion In this study, we observed that the use of dextran 40 infusion therapy concomitantly with unfractionated heparin accelerates recovery substantially and decreases patient complaints significantly in early stages. In particular, reduction in leg pain and calf circumference reduction were more adequate in the dextran group. The early decrease in the calf circumference will have clinical consequences such as less heparin intake, earlier return to normal life, and a decrease in the total cost of treatment. Since the antithrombotic and anticoagulant effects of dextran are well known, we think that its use in this treatment as well as venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should be discussed.

Evidence-Based Minireview: Should warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant be used in patients presenting with thrombosis in the splanchnic or cerebral veins?

Case 1: A 23-year-old female third-year medical student who has no medical history seeks treatment for abdominal distention. She takes an estrogen-containing birth control pill and does not smoke or consume alcohol. Family history is unremarkable. Physical examination is significant for abdominal distention, and an abdominal fluid wave is detected. Complete blood count is normal. Imaging confirms occlusive thrombosis of the main portal vein. On endoscopy, grade 1 to 2 esophageal varices are noted and banded. Unfractionated heparin is begun. Subsequent workup reveals a homozygous factor V Leiden mutation. Long-term anticoagulation is planned, and she asks if warfarin can be avoided given her hectic ward rotations, erratic diet, and need for monitoring. Case 2: A 35-year-old woman who has no medical history seeks treatment for progressively worsening posterior headaches for 1 week. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain shows dural sinus thrombosis with associated small areas of petechial cerebral hemorrhage. She is started on a continuous unfractionated heparin infusion and admitted to the hospital for further observation. Her grandmother is on warfarin for atrial fibrillation, and the patient would prefer to avoid warfarin because she does not think she can comply with the frequent monitoring that will be required. She inquires about other oral anticoagulant options for her condition.

Evaluation of Unfractionated Heparin Dosing by Antifactor Xa During Targeted Temperature Management Post Cardiac Arrest

Purpose: To evaluate unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing guided by antifactor Xa levels during targeted temperature management (TTM) post-cardiac arrest. Methods: Single-center, retrospective, observational study between January 1, 2014 and September 1, 2020. Patients initiated on TTM post-cardiac arrest and UFH were evaluated for inclusion. Patients included were ≥18 years of age and received weight-based UFH for ≥6 hours with 2 antifactor Xa levels drawn at target temperature. Excluded patients had no available temperature readings, received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or factor Xa inhibitor (within 72 hours), or had hypertriglyceridemia or hyperbilirubinemia. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the proportion of patients that achieved a therapeutic antifactor Xa level between 0.3 and 0.7 IU/mL at steady state during TTM. Secondary endpoints included average UFH dose and average time to therapeutic antifactor Xa level at steady state; percent of first and total antifactor Xa levels subtherapeutic, therapeutic, and supratherapeutic during TTM. Results: A total of 73 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 patients achieved steady-state therapeutic antifactor Xa levels during TTM. The average time and dose to steady-state therapeutic antifactor Xa levels were 8.1 ± 4.5 hours and 9.9 ± 3.2 units/kg/hour. Overall, 61.7% of first and 47.4% of all antifactor Xa levels were supratherapeutic during TTM. Three (4.1%) patients experienced a major bleeding event. Conclusions: Guideline recommended UFH dosing, 12 or 18 units/kg/hour, during TTM resulted in more supratherapeutic antifactor Xa levels. Reduction of UFH infusion dose to 10 units/kg/hour may be required during TTM to maintain therapeutic antifactor Xa levels.