Obstetric interventions and pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: A nationwide cohort study

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted maternity services worldwide and imposed restrictions on societal behaviours. This national study aimed to compare obstetric intervention and pregnancy outcome rates in England during the pandemic and corresponding pre-pandemic calendar periods, and to assess whether differences in these rates varied according to ethnic and socioeconomic background. Methods and findings We conducted a national study of singleton births in English National Health Service hospitals. We compared births during the COVID-19 pandemic period (23 March 2020 to 22 February 2021) with births during the corresponding calendar period 1 year earlier. The Hospital Episode Statistics database provided administrative hospital data about maternal characteristics, obstetric inventions (induction of labour, elective or emergency cesarean section, and instrumental birth), and outcomes (stillbirth, preterm birth, small for gestational age [SGA; birthweight < 10th centile], prolonged maternal length of stay (≥3 days), and maternal 42-day readmission). Multi-level logistic regression models were used to compare intervention and outcome rates between the corresponding pre-pandemic and pandemic calendar periods and to test for interactions between pandemic period and ethnic and socioeconomic background. All models were adjusted for maternal characteristics including age, obstetric history, comorbidities, and COVID-19 status at birth. The study included 948,020 singleton births (maternal characteristics: median age 30 years, 41.6% primiparous, 8.3% with gestational diabetes, 2.4% with preeclampsia, and 1.6% with pre-existing diabetes or hypertension); 451,727 births occurred during the defined pandemic period. Maternal characteristics were similar in the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. Compared to the pre-pandemic period, stillbirth rates remained similar (0.36% pandemic versus 0.37% pre-pandemic, p = 0.16). Preterm birth and SGA birth rates were slightly lower during the pandemic (6.0% versus 6.1% for preterm births, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.94–0.97; 5.6% versus 5.8% for SGA births, aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93–0.96; both p < 0.001). Slightly higher rates of obstetric intervention were observed during the pandemic (40.4% versus 39.1% for induction of labour, aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.03–1.05; 13.9% versus 12.9% for elective cesarean section, aOR 1.13, 95% CI 1.11–1.14; 18.4% versus 17.0% for emergency cesarean section, aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.08; all p < 0.001). Lower rates of prolonged maternal length of stay (16.7% versus 20.2%, aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.76–0.78, p < 0.001) and maternal readmission (3.0% versus 3.3%, aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86–0.90, p < 0.001) were observed during the pandemic period. There was some evidence that differences in the rates of preterm birth, emergency cesarean section, and unassisted vaginal birth varied according to the mother’s ethnic background but not according to her socioeconomic background. A key limitation is that multiple comparisons were made, increasing the chance of false-positive results. Conclusions In this study, we found very small decreases in preterm birth and SGA birth rates and very small increases in induction of labour and elective and emergency cesarean section during the COVID-19 pandemic, with some evidence of a slightly different pattern of results in women from ethnic minority backgrounds. These changes in obstetric intervention rates and pregnancy outcomes may be linked to women’s behaviour, environmental exposure, changes in maternity practice, or reduced staffing levels.

Occurrence of malformed calves in April - May 2021 indicates an unnoticed 2020 emergence of Schmallenberg virus in Denmark

During the European emergence of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in 2011, examination of Culicoides spp. showed that SBV infected midges were present across Denmark. However, SBV associated malformations in ruminant species have not been reported in Denmark. In April 2021, seven calves with severe congenital generalized arthrogryposis and reduced body weight originating from a narrow region of the Jutlandic peninsula were submitted for examination. Analysis of fetal brain tissue for SBV viral RNA and pleural effusion for fetal anti-SBV antibodies identified SBV as the cause of the congenital syndrome. Backwards calculation from the calving dates indicated the occurrence of an unnoticed emergence of SBV in Denmark from early August 2020 and during the late summer and autumn. As SBV associated malformations may lead to dystocia urging for fetotomy or Cesarean section, veterinarians performing obstetric intervention are first line personnel in recognition of SBV emergence in domestic ruminants.

Daily weekday audit and feedback to clinicians for an inpatient intervention in obstetrics: is there sustained impact over the weekend? A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study

Background Audit and feedback as an implementation strategy leads to small, but potentially important improvements in practice. Yet, audit and feedback is time and personnel intensive. Many interventions designed for inpatient care are meant to be utilized by care teams all days of the week, including weekends when research staff are at a minimum. We aimed to determine if audit and feedback regarding use of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention performed only on weekdays could have a sustained impact over the weekend. Methods This study was performed as a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study examining the impact of implementation of a validated calculator that predicts the likelihood of cesarean delivery during labor induction. During the 1 year postimplementation period, Monday through Friday, a member of the study team contacted clinicians daily to provide verbal feedback. While the same clinician pool worked weekend shifts, audit and feedback did not occur on Saturdays or Sundays. The primary outcome was intervention use, defined as documentation of counseling around the cesarean risk calculator result, in the electronic health record. Intervention use was compared between those with (weekdays) and without (weekends) audit and feedback. Results Of the 822 women meeting eligibility criteria during the postimplementation period (July 1, 2018–June 30, 2019), 651 (79.2%) were admitted on weekdays when audit and feedback was occurring and 171 (20.8%) on weekends without audit and feedback. The use of the cesarean risk calculator was recorded in 676 of 822 (82.2%) of eligible patient charts. There was no significant difference in cesarean risk calculator use overall by days when audit and feedback occurred versus days without audit and feedback (weekday admissions 82.0% vs. weekend admissions 83.0%, aOR 0.90 95% CI [0.57–1.40], p = 0.76). There was no significant trend in the relationship between calculator use and weekday versus weekend admission by month across the study period (p = 0.21). Conclusions Daily weekday audit and feedback for implementation of an evidence-based inpatient obstetric intervention had sustained impact over the weekends. This finding may have implications for both research staffing, as well as sustainability efforts. Further research should determine the lowest effective frequency of audit and feedback to produce implementation success.

1013How has change in gestational diabetes diagnosis affected pregnancy outcomes?

Background Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) incidence is increasing in Australia, influenced by new diagnostic criteria gradually implemented from 2011. We aimed to identify whether the change was associated with increased obstetric intervention and/or improved outcomes. Methods Linked perinatal, hospital and deaths data from New South Wales identified singleton births, 33-41 weeks, 2006-2015. Adjusted Poisson modelling predicted the GDM incidence trajectory post-2011 without the diagnostic change and estimated the post-2011 “additional GDM” cases. Actual rates of interventions and outcomes for GDM-diagnosed pregnancies were compared with predicted scenarios where the “additional GDM” group was assumed to have the same rate as (ie clinically same as): (A) the “previous GDM” group &lt;2011; (B) the “non-GDM” group &lt;2011; or (C) the “non-GDM” group ≥2011. Results GDM incidence more than doubled over the study period. Actual planned birth, Caesarean and macrosomia rates were consistent with Scenario A, ie higher intervention rates, but lower macrosomia than B and C. Neonatal hypoglycaemia was lower than Scenario A, closer to B and C. Actual perinatal deaths were lower than predicted by all scenarios, showing improvement for all with GDM, not only “additional” cases. Maternal and neonatal morbidity rates were within the confidence bounds for all three predicted scenarios. Conclusions Our study suggests that the widely adopted new diagnostic criteria for GDM are associated with increased obstetric intervention rates and lower macrosomia rates but with no clear impacts on maternal or neonatal morbidity. Key messages A diagnostic criteria change has identified more GDM pregnancies without clear benefit for outcomes.

Association between early pregnant hospitalization and use of obstetric interventions and cesarean: a cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT Objective: Evaluate the association between early pregnant hospitalization and the use of obstetric interventions and cesarean delivery route. Methods: Cross-sectional study, with 758 women selected at the time of childbirth. It was assumed as early hospitalization when the woman was admitted to the hospital having less than 6 cm of cervical dilation. Logistic regression models were constructed in order to estimate the odds ratio for each obstetric intervention, adjusted by sociodemographic and obstetric variables. Results: 73.22% of women were early hospitalized. On average, they had 1.97 times the chance to undergo Kristeller’s maneuver, 2.59 and 1.80 times the chance to receive oxytocin infusion and analgesia, respectively, and 8 times more chances to having their children by cesarean delivery when compared to women that had timely hospitalization. Conclusion: Early hospitalized women were submitted to a higher number of obstetric intervention and had increased chances of undergoing cesarean sections.

Factors associated with obstetric interventions in public maternity hospitals

Objectives: to identify the prevalence and factors associated with obstetric interventions in parturients assisted in public maternity hospitals. Methods: a cross-sectional study with 344 puerperal women, from two public maternity hospitals, referring to childbirth by Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) (Public Health Service System) in Londrina City, Paraná, Brazil, between January and June 2017. The medical records were the data source. The following obstetric interventions were considered: oxytocin use, artificial rupture of the membranes, instrumental childbirth and episiotomy. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to analyze associated factors, with p<5% being significant. Results: the prevalence of obstetric intervention was 55.5%, the maximum number of interventions in the same parturient woman was three. The most frequent interventions were the use of oxytocin (50.0%) and artificial rupture of membranes (29.7%). The variables associated on maternal disease (p=0.005) and intrapartum meconium (p=0.022) independently increased, the risk of obstetric intervention, while dilation was equal to or greater than 5 cm at admission, there was a protective factor against this outcome (p=0.030). Conclusion: the prevalence of obstetric interventions was high. In the case of maternal disease and intrapartum meconium, special attention should be given to the parturient woman, in order to avoid unnecessary interventions. Thus, the maternity hospitals need to review their protocols, seeking good practices in childbirth care.