Treatment of AML Relapse After Allo-HCT

With advances in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT), disease relapse has replaced transplant-related mortality as the primary cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The efficacy of allo-HCT in AML is a consequence of a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect that is mediated by T lymphocytes, and unique mechanisms of immune evasion underlying post-allo-HCT AML relapses have recently been characterized. Relapsed AML following allo-HCT presents a particularly vexing clinical challenge because transplant-related toxicities, such as graft-versus-host (GVHD) and infections, increase the risk of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In general, the prognosis of relapsed AML following allo-HCT is poor with most patients failing to achieve a subsequent remission and 2-year survival consistently <15%. The two factors that have been found to predict a better prognosis are a longer duration of post-transplant remission prior to relapse and a lower disease burden at the time of relapse. When considered in combination with a patient’s age; co-morbidities; and performance status, these factors can help to inform the appropriate therapy for the treatment of post-transplant relapse. This review discusses the options for the treatment of post-transplant AML relapse with a focus on the options to achieve a subsequent remission and consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, such as a second transplant or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). While intensive reinduction therapy and less intensive approaches with hypomethylating agents have long represented the two primary options for the initial treatment of post-transplant relapse, molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy are emerging as potential alternative options to achieve remission. Herein, we highlight response and survival outcomes achieved specifically in the post-transplant setting using each of these approaches and discuss how some therapies may overcome the immunologic mechanisms that have been implicated in post-transplant relapse. As long-term survival in post-transplant relapse necessarily involves consolidation with cellular immunotherapy, we present data on the efficacy and toxicity of both DLI and second allo-HCT including when such therapies are integrated with reinduction. Finally, we provide our general approach to the treatment of post-transplant relapse, integrating both novel therapies and our improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying post-transplant relapse.

Alterations of Peripheral Blood T Cell Subsets following Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is an established method to enhance the Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect. However, alterations of cellular subsets in the peripheral blood of DLI recipients have not been studied. We investigated the changes in lymphocyte subpopulations in 16 patients receiving DLI after successful alloSCT. Up to three DLIs were applied in escalating doses, prophylactically for relapse prevention in high-risk disease (n = 5), preemptively for mixed chimerism and/or a molecular relapse/persistence (n = 8), or as part of treatment for hematological relapse (n = 3). We used immunophenotyping to measure the absolute numbers of CD4+, CD8+, NK, and CD56+ T cells and their respective subsets in patients’ peripheral blood one day before DLI (d-1) and compared the results at day + 1 and + 7 post DLI to the values before DLI. After the administration of 1 × 106 CD3+ cells/kg body weight, we observed an overall increase in the CD8+ and CD56+ T cell counts. We determined significant changes between day − 1 compared to day + 1 and day + 7 in memory and activated CD8+ subsets and CD56+ T cells. Applying a higher dose of DLI (5 × 106 CD3+ cells/kg) led to a significant increase in the overall counts and subsets of CD8+, CD4+, and NK cells. In conclusion, serial immune phenotyping in the peripheral blood of DLI recipients revealed significant changes in immune effector cells, in particular for various CD8+ T cell subtypes, indicating proliferation and differentiation.

Long-term results and GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

We report on 318 patients with acute leukemia, receiving donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in complete hematologic remission (CHR) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). DLI were applied preemptively (preDLI) for minimal residual disease (MRD, n = 23) or mixed chimerism (MC, n = 169), or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients with complete chimerism and molecular remission (proDLI, n = 126). Median interval from alloSCT to DLI1 was 176 days, median follow-up was 7.0 years. Five-year cumulative relapse incidence (CRI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free and overall survival (LFS/OS) of the entire cohort were 29.1%, 12.7%, 58.2%, and 64.3%. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II–IV°/chronic GvHD were 11.9%/31%. Nineteen patients (6%) died from DLI-induced GvHD. Age ≥60 years (p = 0.046), advanced stage at transplantation (p = 0.003), shorter interval from transplantation (p = 0.018), and prior aGvHD ≥II° (p = 0.036) were risk factors for DLI-induced GvHD. GvHD did not influence CRI, but was associated with NRM and lower LFS/OS. Efficacy of preDLI was demonstrated by decreasing MRD/increasing blood counts in 71%, and increasing chimerism in 70%. Five-year OS after preDLI for MRD/MC was 51%/68% among responders, and 37% among non-responders. The study describes response and outcome of DLI in CHR and helps to identify candidates without increased risk of severe GvHD.

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Is a Feasible Way to Improve Survival in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndromes Who Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) yet the major cause of death remains relapse after transplantation which occurs in 30-70% of patients for whom the prognosis is dismal. Since the 1990's donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has been proven able to induce remission after allo-HSCT and the use of therapeutic DLI at relapse has widely increased. The immunological mechanism in DLI is primarily T-cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect driven by genetic differences between donor and recipient in minor and major histocompatibility antigens. DLI treatment at relapse can additionally reverse T-cell exhaustion and increase T-cell receptor diversity, both of which are GVL-enhancing mechanisms. Risks and complications with DLI-treatment are primarily graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Though dose escalation schedules have been suggested to increase the GVL-effect while minimizing the risk of GVHD, uniform therapeutic algorithms are still lacking, treatment is often individually scheduled, and outcome results are often disappointing with reported 2-year overall survival rates at 14-29% in AML relapse patients (Greiner J, Götz M, Bunjes D, Hofmann S, Wais V. Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients. J Clin Med. 2019;9(1):39). During the last decade, treatment with the hypomethylating agent azacitidin (Aza) has become another potential treatment in patients with myeloid malignancies. Immunological mechanisms of GVL in Aza-treatment for relapse include epigenetically reactivation of pro-apoptotic pathways and demasking of tumor-antigens while increased expression of regulatory T-cells protects from GVHD. In recent years DLI and Aza have been used for synergistical effect post-HSCT relapse both in patients who are un-fit to receive high-dose cytoreductive therapy as well as consolidation after reinduction. The aim of this analysis is to report results of retrospective single center-study of patients treated with DLI +/- Aza over a period of twenty years. Methods: Between 2001 and 2020 50 adult patients with relapse after allo-HSCT for AML(n=38) or MDS (n=12) were treated with DLI at the Department of Hematology, Transplant Unit, at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, table 1. Only patients free from active GVHD were selected as DLI-candidates. Median follow-up time was 57 (1-170) months. Reinduction with high-dose chemotherapy was administered in 35 (70%) of patients prior to DLI and 34 (68%) patients were in complete morphological remission (CR) before DLI. DLI-products were unmanipulated and obtained from leukapheresis of unstimulated peripheral blood in matched related or unrelated donors of the original stem cell graft. Patients received a median of 3 (1-5) doses of DLI with median total doses of 6,1x10 7 (5x10 6- 4,65x10 8) CD3 postive T-cells per kg. Aza was used together with DLI from 2012 and administrered in 28 (56%) patients with a median of 6 (2-20) cycles. Reported outcomes are overall survial (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients in CR prior to DLI. Results: At end of follow-up 20 patients were alive, 11 of these in CR and 2 in partial remission. In 7 patients, DLI was discontinued due to the development of GVHD after 1-2 doses, 6/7 of these patients had unrelated donors. Overall, 2 (4%) patients died from GVHD after DLI. Seven patients received a second HSCT after DLI treatment and were censored at this date in survival analyses. Figure 1a+b shows OS in all patients (n=50) and RFS in patients in CR prior to DLI (n=34). 2-year OS was approximately 59% and 5-year OS was 20%. 2-year RFS was approximately 32% and 5-year RFS was 8%. None of the analyzed baseline factors showed significant associations to the probability of OS, table 2, or RFS (data not shown). Reinduktion before first DLI and increasing doses of transplanted CD3 T cell per kg showed trends towards superior survival probability but failed to reach significant levels, possibly due to the limited patient number. Conclusion: Treatment vith DLI +/- Aza is effective and safe as relapse-treatment after allo-HSCT in myeloid diseases. In selected patients, a short-term (2-year) overall survival of 59% is achieved, and 20% of the patients remain long term survivors. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Fischer-Nielsen: A.F.N. is employee and shareholder of StemMedical A/S, a biotech company working with cell-enriched fat grafting.: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company.

Comparison of Prophylactic and Preemptive Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Patients with Very High Risk Acute Leukemia after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Relapse remains to be the biggest problem for patients with very high risk acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) has been widely applied to the prevention and preemptive intervention of relapse post-transplantation. However, the optimal time to implement DLI in patients with a high risk of relapse remains controversial. During August 1, 2014 and August 30, 2020, four hundred and thirty-one consecutive acute leukemia patients with very high-risk features underwent allo-HSCT in our center. Ninety-five patients received prophylactic DLI (pro-DLI) while one hundred and fifty-five patients received preemptive DLI (pre-DLI). Patients were stratified into five risk groups by the disease-risk stratification system (DRSS) which recently introduced by European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation: low risk (N=44), intermediate-1 (N=67), intermediate-2 (N=60), high (N=36), and very high (N=43). In the very high group, patients who received pro-DLI achieved higher 3-year overall survival (OS) (50.8% versus 31.8%, P=0.05), leukemia-free survival (LFS) (52.5% versus 31.6%, P=0.03) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) (47.9% versus 31.6%, P=0.04) compared with pre-DLI. Pro-DLI cohort was associated with a trend of lower 3-year cumulative rates of relapse (42.8% versus 57.9%, P=0.12) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) (4.6% versus 10.5%, P=0.43). In the subgroup of intermediate-2 and high (N=96), pro-DLI cohort was associated with superior survival and relapse rate, though without statistical significance. Further analysis was conducted separately between patients with positive minimal residual disease (MRD) and negative MRD pre-transplant in intermediate-2/high subgroup. In the patients with positive MRD before all-HSCT, pro-DLI achieved significant higher 3-year OS (66.7 % versus 26.2%, P=0.028), PFS (68.6 % versus 24.7%, P=0.015) and GRFS (68.6 % versus 14.4%, P=0.007), along with lower cumulative of relapse (31.4 % versus 59.3%, P=0.1) and NRM (0 versus 16%, P=0.1) compared with pre-DLI. However, pro-DLI patients was associated with inferior OS (52.7 % versus 77.8%, P=0.046), PFS(54.8 % versus 75.3%, P=0.247) and NRM (25% versus 3%, P=0.02) in patients with negative MRD. In addition, no difference was found in patients in the group of low and intermediate-1 risk. Taken together, we recommend early pro-DLI in patients of very-high risk group and positive MRD of intermediate-2/high group. Pre-DLI given timely after MRD turning positive achieved better outcome in the remaining patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Venetoclax plus azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusion in treating acute myeloid leukemia patients who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus azacitidine and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in treating patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Twenty-six AML patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT were enrolled and treated with venetoclax plus azacitidine and DLI. Complete remission with incomplete recovery (CRi), partial remission (PR), and objective remission rate (ORR) were assessed, and then event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Besides, adverse events were documented. Additionally, whole exome sequencing was performed in bone marrow samples. The CRi, PR, and ORR rates were 26.9%, 34.6%, and 61.5%, respectively. The median time of EFS and OS was 120 (95% CI: 71–610) days and 284.5 (95% CI: 81–610) days, respectively. The most common adverse events were hematologic system adverse events including agranulocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, while the adverse events of other systems were relatively less and milder. In addition, no serious adverse events existed. Of note, there were 6 (23.1%) patients who developed GVHD. As for gene mutation, 49 mutated genes were found, which were categorized as first-, second-, and third-class mutations, and then further analysis revealed that the first-class mutations were not correlated with EFS or OS. Additionally, the most frequent mutated genes were FLT3, CEBPA, DNMT3A, KIT, KRAS, and NRAS. Venetoclax plus azacitidine and DLI is efficient and tolerant in treating patients with relapsed AML after allo-HSCT, implying this combined therapy as a potential treatment option in the studied patients.