Abstract
This preliminary study evaluates ten gridded precipitation datasets in Indonesia, namely APHRODITE, CMORPH, CHIRPS, GFD, SA-OBS, TMPA 3B42 v7, PERSIAN-CDR at 0.25°, moreover GSMaP_NRT V06, GPM-IMERG (Early-Run) V06, and MSWEP V2 at 0.1» in the period of 2003 to 2015. The evaluation focuses on time series bias using metrics such as Mean Error, Coefficient of Variation, Relative Change (Variability), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (KS-test) at daily, monthly, seasonal, and annual time scales. The statistical relationship between the precipitation datasets with reference observational data use Taylor diagrams for evaluating the relative skill of the precipitation dataset. The study aims to evaluate the uncertainty of the precipitation datasets compared to rain gauge datasets. Time series bias of SA-OBS and MSWEP have the nearest value to zero as the best score. The relative skill of monthly rainfall based on rainfall typical shows that MSWEP outperformed in regions A and B, GPM-IMERG in C region. GPM-IMERG's relative skill is outperformed than other datasets at annual time scale in Region A and B, while TMPA 3B42 in Region C. The application of existing precipitation datasets is essential to cope with the limitation of rain gauge observations. This study implicates the development of precipitation products in the Indonesia region.