mesh erosion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

170
(FIVE YEARS 38)

H-INDEX

22
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy Morris ◽  
Robyn Patrick ◽  
Bakar Ali ◽  
Munir Tarazi

Abstract Introduction Surgical mesh has long been used for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. In recent years high rates of serious complications have been reported and the US has withdrawn it from use, while the UK advises extreme caution. Here, we present a review of the literature with a focus on causative factors. Methods Twenty-three articles were included in the review: 21 cases of rectal mesh erosion and three cases of sigmoid mesh erosion. Causative factors were subdivided into patient-related, mesh-related and procedure-related. Results Main patient related risk factors included pre-existing intestinal diseases (reported in 4 cases) and an older age (median 65.5). Risk factors that were mesh related included increased porosity. 11 cases were reported with a macroporous (>75µm) mesh, whereas only 1 case had used a microporous (<10µM) mesh. 9 cases with partial/ no details of the mesh. The main risk factor that was procedure related was concomitant hysterectomy with 7 cases of mesh erosion had concomitant hysterectomy, 11 cases without concomitant hysterectomy, with a further 5 being unclear. Conclusion Pre-existing bowel disease, mesh type and mechanical factors associated with surgical technique all influenced the risk of mesh erosion into the bowels. A lack of reported information regarding the original surgical mesh and operation hindered the ability to draw conclusions. A step into rectifying this in the future would be the provision of medical device cards directly to the patient detailing the mesh.


Uro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 72-75
Author(s):  
Cheau Williams ◽  
Ethan McBrayer ◽  
Samantha Leggio

(1) Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is common among post-menopausal women affecting more than 25% in their lifetime—with 11% having a lifetime risk of undergoing an operation for a POP. In April 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) took surgical mesh for transvaginal use off the market due to safety and effectiveness concerns. This leaves colporrhaphy or colporrhaphy with bio-graft options for a POP surgical repair. (2) Case: In this report, we look at a case with anterior mesh erosion complicated by poor wound healing secondary to heavy tobacco use and how it was successfully removed and augmented with a Coloplast axis allograft dermis biological graft secured with an Anchorsure sacrospinous ligament/arcus tendineus fascia pelvis fixation device and prolene suture. (3) Results: After failing two prior surgeries to rectify the mesh erosion, a final procedure was performed using a biologic dermal graft and a double-layer closure to aid in protecting and increasing the integrity of the tissue. (4) Conclusions: Collectively, the patient and her surgeries highlight the difficult nature of complete mesh removal and how tobacco use can significantly affect the proper healing of surgical sites. The number of surgeries necessary to address the patient’s chief complaint and the resolution of her symptoms with the biologic graft supports the challenges one faces with mesh removal and poor wound healing secondary to tobacco use. This case illustrates that complicated transvaginal mesh erosion should initially be augmented with a biologic dermal graft secured via sacrospinous ligament/arcus tendineus fascia pelvis fixation and double-layer closure and not only if visible mesh removal alone fails.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E MacCraith ◽  
E Cunnane ◽  
M Joyce ◽  
J Forde ◽  
F O'Brien ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study is to systematically compare rates of erosion and chronic pain after mesh insertion for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. Method A systematic electronic search was performed on studies that evaluated the incidence of erosion and chronic pain after mesh insertion for POP or SUI. The primary outcome measurement was to compare mesh erosion and chronic pain rates for POP and SUI surgery. Results Twenty-six studies on 292,606 patients (n = 9077 for POP surgery and n = 283529 for SUI surgery) met inclusion criteria. The POP group were older (p < 0.0001) and had a lower BMI (p < 0.0001). Mesh erosion rates were significantly greater in the POP group compared to the SUI group (4% versus 1.9%) [OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.91-2.37; p < 0.0001]. The incidence of chronic pain was significantly greater in the POP group compared to the SUI group (6.7% versus 0.6%) [OR 11.02; 95% CI 8.15-14.9; p < 0.0001]. Conclusions The risk of mesh erosion and chronic pain is significantly higher after surgery for POP compared to SUI. Since a higher volume of mesh is typically used for POP surgery this supports evidence for a dose-response relationship between the volume of mesh used and the erosion risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1822
Author(s):  
Sa Ra Lee ◽  
Ju Hee Kim ◽  
Sung Hoon Kim ◽  
Hee Dong Chae

In this study, we introduce a new wrinkle method for intracorporeal anterior vaginal wall plication during sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) aiming to decrease POP recurrence and postoperative vaginal wall mesh erosion. The wrinkle method was performed using robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) on 57 symptomatic POP patients. Sixty-six patients underwent conventional RSC before the development of the wrinkle method. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes were compared. The wrinkle method is not time consuming. The total operative time was shorter in the wrinkle group than in the non-wrinkle group; however, this was attributed to lower adhesiolysis in the wrinkle group. No differences were recorded in the mean estimated blood loss and complication rates between the two groups. In conclusion, although we were unable to confirm that the wrinkle method decreased POP recurrence and vaginal wall mesh erosion after RSC because of the short follow-up period, our preliminary findings are positive in terms of safety. Further long-term well designed randomized controlled trials are required to elucidate the benefits of the wrinkle method.


BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Hagiwara ◽  
Shigeoki Hayashi ◽  
Takeki Suzuki ◽  
Keio Song ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama

Abstract Background Fistula formation due to mesh erosion into hollow viscera, such as the urinary bladder, is uncommon. To date, there have been no reports of fistula formation into the urinary bladder without evidence of mesh erosion after hernioplasty; herein, we report one such rare case, in which the clinical symptoms improved without any surgical intervention. Case presentation A 73-year-old man underwent a trans-abdominal preperitoneal repair for bilateral direct inguinal hernia. One month later, the patient experienced a painful induration in the right inguinal region, and computed tomography revealed fluid collection in this region. A culture of the aspirated fluid yielded no bacteria. Seven months later, he experienced another episode of painful induration in the same region. However, blood examination revealed a normal white blood cell count and C-reactive protein level. Moreover, no organisms were detected by aspirated fluid culture. Although the painful induration subsided after aspiration of the fluid collection, he developed gross hematuria and dysuria a month later. Cystoscopy revealed a fistula in the right wall of the urinary bladder that discharged a purulent fluid. Culture of the fluid revealed no bacteria, and there was no evidence of mesh erosion. Hematuria improved without therapeutic or surgical intervention. The patient’s clinical symptoms improved without mesh removal. Moreover, cystoscopy revealed that the fistula was scarred 12 months after the initial appearance of urinary symptoms. No further complications were observed during a 42-month follow-up period. Conclusions We report a rare case of a fistula in the urinary bladder without evidence of mesh erosion after laparoscopic hernioplasty. The patient’s condition improved without mesh removal. Fluid collection due to foreign body reaction to meshes can cause fistula formation in the urinary bladder without direct mesh contact.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 941
Author(s):  
Amanda Schmidt ◽  
Gordon O’Brien ◽  
David Taylor

Mesh erosion is a phenomenon whereby soft tissue becomes damaged as a result of contact with implants made from surgical mesh, a fabric-like material consisting of fibers of polypropylene or other polymers. This paper describes the design and construction of a testing machine to generate mesh erosion in vitro. A sample of mesh in the form of a 10 mm wide tape is pressed against soft tissue (porcine muscle) with a given force, and a given reciprocating movement is applied between the mesh and the tissue. To demonstrate the capabilities of the equipment, we measured erosion using the same mesh and tissue type, varying the applied force and the reciprocating stroke length, including zero strokes (i.e., static loading). For comparison, we also tested four other samples of polypropylene with different edge characteristics. Analysis of the results suggests the existence of three different erosion mechanisms: cutting, wear and creep. It is concluded that the equipment provides a useful and realistic simulation of mesh erosion, a phenomenon that is of great clinical significance and merits further study.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document