septic abortion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

197
(FIVE YEARS 17)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lien Gruwier ◽  
Aaron Sprenkels ◽  
Sofie Hulsbosch ◽  
Anne Vankeerberghen ◽  
Reinoud Cartuyvels

Background. Sneathia amnii (formerly designated as Leptotrichia amnionii ) was first described in 2002 in the USA. Members of the genus Sneathia can be part of the normal flora of the genitourinary tract, but have been implicated in invasive (mostly gynaecological) infections. Case presentation. To the best of our knowledge, here we present the first case of S. amnii infection in Belgium, in a young woman presenting with fever leading to second trimester septic abortion. Conclusions. Despite its pathogenicity, S. amnii remains an underrated cause of infections due to inherent difficulties with conventional laboratory methods. By extracting the bacterial DNA directly from the blood culture broth and performing a 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence analysis we succeeded in identifying S. amnii as the most probable cause of the septic abortion in our patient.


2021 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-499
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Stairs ◽  
Yahya Shabi ◽  
Glenn Patriquin ◽  
Saul Offman ◽  
Marianne Pierce

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 66-73
Author(s):  
Rokhshana Khatun ◽  
Osman Gani ◽  
Lipika Ghosh ◽  
Mamata Manjari

Background & objective: Among the gynaecological cases admitted in tertiary care hospitals, abortion occupies the highest position. But detailed studies about the pattern of abortion admitted in the hospitals are limited. The present study was intended to find the proportion of abortion cases to total admitted cases and describe the types, clinical presentation and consequences of abortions. Methods: This study was carried out among a cross-section of abortion patients admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dhaka Medical College Hospital. A total of 100 women admitted with a history of abortion between January and June, 2003 were consecutively included in the study. On admission, blood sample was sent for blood grouping & cross-matching and estimation of haemoglobin. Additional investigations like routine blood test, TC, DC, urine for R/E were done in septic abortion cases. High vaginal swab was collected from all cases but only in 5 patients, it was possible to carry out culture and sensitivity test. All cases were admitted and followed up to discharge for studying their consequences. Result: Majority (61%) of the patients was admitted in their third decade of life. The included cases were predominantly poor (68%), Muslim (97%) and urban residents (78%). Over half (54%) of the patients were illiterate. Sixty percent patients were multipara, 21% primipara and 19% nullipara. Two patients were unmarried. One-quarter had previous history of 1-4 abortions. Of the 100 cases of abortions, over three-quarters (77%) were of spontaneous abortions and 23% were of induced abortions. Two-thirds (66%) of the cases presented with incomplete abortions, which among others, included incomplete MR (13%). Septic abortion was 12%; of which 10% were induced and 2% spontaneous abortions, complicated to septic abortions. Missed abortion was 10%, inevitable 10% and threatened 6%. Out of 100 cases, 86% required operative intervention which included dilatation, evacuation and curettage (95.2%), subtotal hysterectomy, repair of perforation, hysterotomy and colpotomy. Two threatened abortions cases continued their pregnancy. One threatened abortion, five missed abortion, one septic abortion and six inevitable abortion cases spontaneously expelled their product of conceptus. Seventy-nine patients received whole blood transfusion to compensate for haemorrhage. Over 80% were discharged from the hospital within 5 days. Complications (except anaemia) of abortion were found in 49% cases. One case of septic abortion with endotoxic shock and severe anemia died of the disease. Conclusion: Complications of abortion are preventable if the patients are made aware about the grave consequences of abortion and appropriate health services are extended at field levels. Ibrahim Card Med J 2020; 10 (1&2): 66-73


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 54
Author(s):  
Angel Millan Juarez ◽  
Carla America Suarez Juarez ◽  
Ana Elena Barrios Herandez ◽  
Ithamar Milagros Arroyo Martinez ◽  
Elizabeth Rendon Mondragon

Author(s):  
Dr. Saeeda Wasim ◽  
Tanish Baqar ◽  
Dr. Shriya Arora ◽  
Dr. Sharique Ahmad
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (06) ◽  
pp. 1194-1198
Author(s):  
Kiran Ikram ◽  
Surraya Israr ◽  
Ubaid Ullah Khan ◽  
Umer Farooq ◽  
Iqbal Begum

Objectives: To find frequency of common complications among patients presenting with induced septic abortion attending OPD of Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar. Study Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology Hayatabad Medical complex Peshawar. Period: 6 October, 2016 to 6 April, 2017. Material & Methods: Through a cross sectional validation study design, 123 pregnant female patients with induced septic abortion having a gestation period of 20 to 22 weeks were included in the research study. After their consent, detailed clinical examination and history of patients were taken. SPSS version 10.0 was used for analysis of the collected data. Descriptive statistical data like mean + Standard deviation was measured for age, gravidity & parity. Likewise, frequency & percentage was calculated for hemorrhage, diffuse peritonitis and severe anemia. Results: As per Common Complications, frequencies and percentages for hemorrhage was recorded in 31 (25.20%) patients, diffuse peritonitis was recorded in 49 (39.83%) patients while severe anemia was recorded in 26 (21.13%) patients. However, 17 patients (13.82%) had no complications other than septic abortion. Conclusion: Our study concluded that the mishap of septic-induced abortion is totally preventable. The definitive commitment to women’s health can be achieved through effective contraception and by strengthening the family welfare services. Positive results can be achieved by discouraging repeated terminations of pregnancy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 116-117
Author(s):  
Bimal K. Agrawal ◽  
Neha Vashishat ◽  
Barinder Kaur ◽  
Gaurav Aggarwal

Author(s):  
Sedigheh Ghasemian Dizajmehr ◽  
Farzaneh Rashidi Fakari ◽  
Samira Jahangard ◽  
Elham Rajabi ◽  
Mohsen Ghasemian

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document