hybridization analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

773
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

63
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Okada ◽  
Masahiro Teramoto ◽  
Noriaki Tachi ◽  
Toshikuni Kawamura ◽  
Toshikatsu Horiuchi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Chromosomal abnormalities (CAs) have been identified as important factors in determining the biological features and prognostic value of multiple myeloma (MM). MYC gene-related abnormalities (MYC GAs) are one of the CAs, but its unfavorable impact has not been fully investigated in daily clinical practice. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the prognostic impact of MYC GAs on 81 patients through fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in our institute. Results: MYC GAs were associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–7.73; p = 0.017), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.58–5.53; p < 0.001), and time to next treatment (TNT) (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.13–3.93; p = 0.018) in the median follow-up of 34.7 months. Furthermore, MYC GAs with an additional chromosome 8 (MYC-Ch8(+)) were associated with shorter PFS (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.38–7.2; p = 0.0064), whereas MYC GAs without an additional chromosome 8 (MYC-Ch8(−)) were associated with shorter PFS (HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.51–8.68; p = 0.004) and shorter TNT (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.41–9.81; p = 0.0078). Conclusion: These findings could help identify high-risk patients with MM. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the significance of MYC GAs for the MM prognostic effect.


2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1345-1347
Author(s):  
R. A. Miftakhov ◽  
S. A. Lapa ◽  
V. E. Kuznetsova ◽  
A. M. Zolotov ◽  
V. A. Vasiliskov ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 688-701
Author(s):  
Marcus Fernando Kodama Pertille Ramos ◽  
Marina Alessandra Pereira ◽  
Evandro Sobroza de Mello ◽  
Cinthya dos Santos Cirqueira ◽  
Bruno Zilberstein ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-318
Author(s):  
Denis S. Fedorinov ◽  
Rustam N. Geidarov ◽  
Igor A. Shashkov ◽  
Vladimir M. Mikhailovich ◽  
Marina A. Lyadova ◽  
...  

Aim. To assess the association between the carriage of minor allelic variants of 8 genes that encode key enzymes involved in the metabolism of anticancer drugs (DPYD, GSTP1, MTHFR, UGT1A1) and cell repair (XPC, ERCC1, TYMP, NQO1) and the severity of adverse drug events in patients with common gastrointestinal tumors. Tasks. To study the frequency of minor allelic variants of the DPYD, GSTP1, MTHFR, UGT1A1, XPC, ERCC1, TYMP, NQO1 genes; to assess the frequency and severity of adverse drug events of chemotherapy treatment in the study population. Materials and methods. For the period from October 2020 to April 2021, 56 patients (women 29, men 27) with verified malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract were included in a prospective clinical study as a part of the RSF grant No. 20-75-10158. The mean age was 62.311.4 years. Colon cancer was detected in 24 patients, tumors of the esophagus and stomach in 19 patients, tumors of pancreas and biliary tract in 13 patients. First-line palliative chemotherapy was given to 27 patients, adjuvant 19 patients, neoadjuvant 10 patients. All patients had not previously received cytotoxic or radiation treatment. Point nucleotide variants of genes DPYD, XPC, GSTP1, MTHFR, ERCC1, UGT1A1, TYMPS, NQO1 were determined by hybridization analysis on biological microchips. Differences in the tolerance of cytotoxic therapy (5-fluorouracil, platinum preparations, irinotecan) depending on the genotype were assessed using Fishers exact test. Results. The average number of chemotherapy courses received was 4.22.6 (112). There was a statistically significant difference in the tolerability of chemotherapy in patients with minor allelic variants of the GSTP1 rs1695 (p=0.03), ERCC1 rs11615 (p=0.01), and UGT1A1 rs8175347 (p=0.003) genes. Conclusion. The use of hybridization analysis on biological microchips to assess allelic variants responsible for the tolerability of cytotoxic therapy is reasonable and requires further prospective assessment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Parrott ◽  
Vundavalli V. Murty ◽  
Caitlin Walsh ◽  
Alecia Christiano ◽  
Govind Bhagat ◽  
...  

BIOPHYSICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-31
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Ikonnikova ◽  
V. E. Shershov ◽  
Yu. V. Moroz ◽  
V. A. Vasiliskov ◽  
S. A. Lapa ◽  
...  

Placenta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 253
Author(s):  
Junxiao Wang ◽  
Aya Misawa ◽  
Takami Takizawa ◽  
Shan-Shun Luo ◽  
Toshihiro Takizawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document