interchromatin space
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2013 ◽  
Vol 203 (1) ◽  
pp. 149-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-wing Fong ◽  
Yujing Li ◽  
Wenqi Wang ◽  
Wenbin Ma ◽  
Kunpeng Li ◽  
...  

The nucleus is a unique organelle that contains essential genetic materials in chromosome territories. The interchromatin space is composed of nuclear subcompartments, which are defined by several distinctive nuclear bodies believed to be factories of DNA or RNA processing and sites of transcriptional and/or posttranscriptional regulation. In this paper, we performed a genome-wide microscopy-based screening for proteins that form nuclear foci and characterized their localizations using markers of known nuclear bodies. In total, we identified 325 proteins localized to distinct nuclear bodies, including nucleoli (148), promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies (38), nuclear speckles (27), paraspeckles (24), Cajal bodies (17), Sam68 nuclear bodies (5), Polycomb bodies (2), and uncharacterized nuclear bodies (64). Functional validation revealed several proteins potentially involved in the assembly of Cajal bodies and paraspeckles. Together, these data establish the first atlas of human proteins in different nuclear bodies and provide key information for research on nuclear bodies.


2009 ◽  
Vol 186 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Bond ◽  
Archa H. Fox

Paraspeckles are ribonucleoprotein bodies found in the interchromatin space of mammalian cell nuclei. These structures play a role in regulating the expression of certain genes in differentiated cells by nuclear retention of RNA. The core paraspeckle proteins (PSF/SFPQ, P54NRB/NONO, and PSPC1 [paraspeckle protein 1]) are members of the DBHS (Drosophila melanogaster behavior, human splicing) family. These proteins, together with the long nonprotein-coding RNA NEAT1 (MEN-ε/β), associate to form paraspeckles and maintain their integrity. Given the large numbers of long noncoding transcripts currently being discovered through whole transcriptome analysis, paraspeckles may be a paradigm for a class of subnuclear bodies formed around long noncoding RNA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Rouquette ◽  
Christel Genoud ◽  
Gerardo H. Vazquez-Nin ◽  
Bernd Kraus ◽  
Thomas Cremer ◽  
...  

FEBS Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 272 (17) ◽  
pp. 4327-4338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Segawa ◽  
Koko Niino ◽  
Reiko Mineki ◽  
Naoko Kaga ◽  
Kimie Murayama ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo Melčák ◽  
Štěpánka Melčáková ◽  
Vojtěch Kopsky ◽  
Jaromı́ra Večeřová ◽  
Ivan Raška

Nuclear speckles (speckles) represent a distinct nuclear compartment within the interchromatin space and are enriched in splicing factors. They have been shown to serve neighboring active genes as a reservoir of these factors. In this study, we show that, in HeLa cells, the (pre)spliceosomal assembly on precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) is associated with the speckles. For this purpose, we used microinjection of splicing competent and mutant adenovirus pre-mRNAs with differential splicing factor binding, which form different (pre)spliceosomal complexes and followed their sites of accumulation. Splicing competent pre-mRNAs are rapidly targeted into the speckles, but the targeting is temperature-dependent. The polypyrimidine tract sequence is required for targeting, but, in itself, is not sufficient. The downstream flanking sequences are particularly important for the targeting of the mutant pre-mRNAs into the speckles. In supportive experiments, the behavior of the speckles was followed after the microinjection of antisense deoxyoligoribonucleotides complementary to the specific domains of snRNAs. Under these latter conditions prespliceosomal complexes are formed on endogenous pre-mRNAs. We conclude that the (pre)spliceosomal complexes on microinjected pre-mRNA are formed inside the speckles. Their targeting into and accumulation in the speckles is a result of the cumulative loading of splicing factors to the pre-mRNA and the complexes formed give rise to the speckled pattern observed.


2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (14) ◽  
pp. 2585-2593 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.E. Visser ◽  
F. Jaunin ◽  
S. Fakan ◽  
J.A. Aten

Chromosome territories need to be well defined at high resolution before functional aspects of chromosome organization in interphase can be explored. To visualize chromosomes by electron microscopy (EM), the DNA of Chinese hamster fibroblasts was labeled in vivo with thymidine analogue BrdU. Labeled chromosomes were then segregated during several cell cycles to obtain nuclei containing only 2 to 3 labeled chromosomes. Subsequent immunocytochemical detection of BrdU allowed analysis by EM of chromosome territories and subchromosomal domains in well preserved nuclei. Our results provide the first high resolution visualization of chromosomes in interphase nuclei. We show that chromosome domains are either separated from one another by interchromatin space or are in close contact with no or little intermingling of their DNA. This demonstrates that, while chromosomes form discrete territories, chromatin of adjacent chromosomes may be in contact in limited regions, thus implying chromosome-chromosome interactions. Chromosomes are organized as condensed chromatin with dispersed chromatin extending into the interchromatin space that is largely devoid of DNA. The interchromatin space, which is known to be involved in various nuclear functions, forms interconnecting channels running through and around chromosome territories. Functional implications of this organization are discussed.


2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 799-805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thoru Pederson

A cell fraction that would today be termed “the nuclear matrix” was first described and patented in 1948 by Russian investigators. In 1974 this fraction was rediscovered and promoted as a fundamental organizing principle of eukaryotic gene expression. Yet, convincing evidence for this functional role of the nuclear matrix has been elusive and has recently been further challenged. What do we really know about the nonchromatin elements (if any) of internal nuclear structure? Are there objective reasons (as opposed to thinly veiled disdain) to question experiments that use harsh nuclear extraction steps and precipitation-prone conditions? Are the known biophysical properties of the nucleoplasm in vivo consistent with the existence of an extensive network of anastomosing filaments coursing dendritically throughout the interchromatin space? To what extent may the genome itself contribute information for its own quarternary structure in the interphase nucleus? These questions and recent work that bears on the mystique of the nuclear matrix are addressed in this essay. The degree to which gene expression literally depends on nonchromatin nuclear structure as a facilitating organizational format remains an intriguing but unsolved issue in eukaryotic cell biology, and considerable skepticism continues to surround the nuclear matrix fraction as an accurate representation of the in vivo situation.


1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan C. Politz ◽  
Richard A. Tuft ◽  
Thoru Pederson ◽  
Robert H. Singer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document