Cervical Myelopathy Caused by Non-Rheumatic Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor: An Investigation of Underlying Mechanisms and Optimal Surgical Strategy

Study Design Retrospective case-control study. Objective This study aimed to identify the underlying pathologies of non-rheumatic retro-odontoid pseudotumors (NRPs), which would help establish an appropriate surgical strategy for myelopathy caused by NRP. Methods We identified 35 patients with myelopathy caused by NRP who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2017. An age- and sex-matched control group of 70 subjects was selected from patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Radiographic risk factors for NRP were compared between cases and controls. We also assessed surgical outcomes following occipital-cervical (O-C) fusion, atlantoaxial (C1-2) fusion, or C1 laminectomy. Results Patients with NRP had significantly lower C1 sagittal inner diameter, C2-7 range of motion (ROM), C2-7 Cobb angle, and C7 tilt, as well as significantly higher C1-2 ROM, atlantodental interval (ADI), and C1-2 to O-C7 ROM ratio. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that ADI, C2-7 ROM, and C7 tilt were independent risk factors for NRP. Neurological recovery and pseudotumor size reduction were comparable among surgical procedures, whereas post-operative cervical spine function was significantly lower in the O-C fusion group than in the other groups. Conclusion Non-rheumatic retro-odontoid pseudotumor was associated with an increase in ADI, suggesting that spinal arthrodesis surgery is a reasonable strategy for NRP. C1-2 fusion is preferable over O-C fusion because of the high prevalence of ankylosis in the subaxial cervical spine. Given that 29% of patients with NRP have C1 hypoplasia, such cases can be treated by posterior decompression alone. Our study highlights the need to select appropriate surgical procedures based on the underlying pathology in each case.

Management of Pediatric Tumors With Vascular Extension

Background: Pediatric tumors can present with vascular extension to the inferior vena cava and right atrium, which impacts the surgical strategy and can be challenging during surgical treatment. Wilms tumor (WT) is the most common retroperitoneal tumor that can present with vascular extension, but also adrenal tumors, clear cell tumors from the kidney, and hepatoblastomas can present with this situation. Surgical aims include obtaining complete tumor resection without risk for patients, to avoid severe bleeding, cardiac arrest, and embolization, and to avoid cardiac bypass if possible.Objective: To describe and discuss the surgical strategies to deal with pediatric tumors with vascular extension and propose a protocol.Method: Retrospectivly review the experience of treating patients with vascular extension in a single institution, describing different scenarios and a decision making fluxogram based on the preoperative evaluation regarding the surgical techniques and the need for cardiac bypass that are adequate for each situation. Image studies are important to guide the surgical strategy. Depending on the quality of image available, computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be enough to give the information needed for surgical decisions. Ultrasonography (US) with Doppler is helpful to confirm diagnosis and describes factors to guide the adequate surgical strategy, like the upper level extension and presence or absence of blood flow around the thrombus. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is indicated in most cases, in order to reduce the upper level of extension (and avoid the need for cardiac bypass) and to lower the risk of embolization. The approach is based on the upper level of the thrombus and can include cavotomy or cavectomy, sometimes with cardiac bypass and cardiac arrest with hypothermia, when the thrombus reaches the diaphragmatic level or above. Pathology analysis of the thrombus can guide staging and the need for radiotherapy postoperatively.Results: A decision making fluxogram protocol is presented focusing on the surgical treatment of such condition.Conclusion: Surgery strategy is highly impacted by the presence of vascular extension in pediatric tumors. Surgeons should be aware of potential complications and how to prevent them. Such cases should be treated in reference centers.

Epilepsy surgery for low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor of temporal lobe: a single-institution experience of 61 patients

Background Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumor (LEAT) is highly responsive to surgery in general. The appropriate surgical strategy remains controversial in temporal LEAT. The aim of this study is to analyze the surgical seizure outcome of temporal LEAT, focusing on the aspects of surgical strategy. Methods Sixty-one patients from a single epilepsy center with temporal LEAT underwent surgery. The surgical strategy was according to the multidisciplinary presurgical evaluation. Electrocorticogram (ECoG)-assisted resection was utilized. Surgical extent including lesionectomy and extended resection was described in detail. Seizure outcome was classified as satisfactory (Engel class I) and unsatisfactory (Engel classes II–IV). Results After a median follow-up of 36.0 (30.0) months, 83.6% of patients achieved satisfactory outcome, including 72.1% with Engel class Ia. There was 39.3% (24/61) of patients with antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Use of ECoG (χ2 = 0.000, P > 0.1), preresection spike (χ2 = 0.000, P = 0.763), or spike residue (P = 0.545) was not correlated with the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, outcome from lesionectomy was comparable to extended resection (χ2 = 0.499, P > 0.1). For mesial temporal LEAT, 94.7% (18/19) of patients who underwent additional hippocampectomy were satisfactory, whereas only 25% (1/4) of patients who underwent lesionectomy were satisfactory (P = 0.009). Conclusion Surgical treatment was highly effective for temporal LEAT. ECoG may not influence the seizure outcome. For lateral temporal LEAT, lesionectomy with or without cortectomy was sufficient in most patients. For mesial temporal LEAT, extended resection was recommended.