sea otters
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

468
(FIVE YEARS 77)

H-INDEX

44
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole H. Carter ◽  
Melissa A. Miller ◽  
Megan E. Moriarty ◽  
M. Tim Tinker ◽  
Roderick B. Gagne ◽  
...  

Temperature ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Traver Wright ◽  
Melinda Sheffield-Moore

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie M. Rouse ◽  
Katrina L. Counihan ◽  
Deborah D. Boege Tobin ◽  
Caroline E. C. Goertz ◽  
Khrystyne N. Duddleston

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C. Watson ◽  
Michael W. Hawkes ◽  
Lynn C. Lee ◽  
Andy Lamb

Abstract Eisenia arborea has a disjunct distribution along the west coast of North America. We detail the current distribution of E. arborea and use long-term records to examine how present-day shifts in E. arborea prevalence and abundance in British Columbia (BC), relative to the dominant stipitate kelp Pterygophora californica, may be driven by interactions between changing grazing pressure and warming water. We further speculate on how the disjunction of E. arborea arose. The ancestor of E. arborea likely dispersed from Japan to North America where glaciation disrupted its distribution and speciation occurred. As glaciers retreated E. arborea likely dispersed into BC from warmer waters in the south and/or expanded from refugia off Vancouver Island and Haida Gwaii. While E. arborea is uncommon, our records extend its range into Alaska and Washington State. Along western Vancouver Island, BC, under warming conditions, E. arborea prevalence and abundance increased where once-extirpated sea otters (Enhydra lutris) removed urchins. Where otters were absent, however, reduced summer wave heights, associated with warming, apparently allowed urchins to graze shallow-water kelps, which declined. We suggest that under warming conditions, sea otters may increase kelp resilience, with E. arborea becoming more prevalent in NE Pacific kelp forests.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McKay Strobel ◽  
Melissa A. Miller ◽  
Michael J. Murray ◽  
Colleen Reichmuth

Ecosystems ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Slade ◽  
Iain McKechnie ◽  
Anne K. Salomon

AbstractThe historic extirpation and subsequent recovery of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) have profoundly changed coastal social-ecological systems across the northeastern Pacific. Today, the conservation status of sea otters is informed by estimates of population carrying capacity or growth rates independent of human impacts. However, archaeological and ethnographic evidence suggests that for millennia, complex hunting and management protocols by Indigenous communities limited sea otter abundance near human settlements to reduce the negative impacts of this keystone predator on shared shellfish prey. To assess relative sea otter prevalence in the Holocene, we compared the size structure of ancient California mussels (Mytilus californianus) from six archaeological sites in two regions on the Pacific Northwest Coast, to modern California mussels at locations with and without sea otters. We also quantified modern mussel size distributions from eight locations on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada, varying in sea otter occupation time. Comparisons of mussel size spectra revealed that ancient mussel size distributions are consistently more similar to modern size distributions at locations with a prolonged absence of sea otters. This indicates that late Holocene sea otters were maintained well below carrying capacity near human settlements as a result of human intervention. These findings illuminate the conditions under which sea otters and humans persisted over millennia prior to the Pacific maritime fur trade and raise important questions about contemporary conservation objectives for an iconic marine mammal and the social-ecological system in which it is embedded.


2021 ◽  
Vol 251 (3343) ◽  
pp. 21
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 529-537
Author(s):  
Megan E. Moriarty ◽  
Melissa A. Miller ◽  
Michael J. Murray ◽  
Pádraig J. Duignan ◽  
Catherine T. Gunther-Harrington ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Eisaguirre ◽  
Perry J. Williams ◽  
Xinyi Lu ◽  
Michelle L. Kissling ◽  
William S. Beatty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Reintroducing predators is a promising conservation tool to help remedy human-caused ecosystem changes. However, the growth and spread of a reintroduced population is a spatiotemporal process that is driven by a suite of factors, such as habitat change, human activity, and prey availability. Sea otters (Enhydra lutris) are apex predators of nearshore marine ecosystems that had declined nearly to extinction across much of their range by the early 20th century. In Southeast Alaska, which is comprised of a diverse matrix of nearshore habitat and managed areas, reintroduction of 413 individuals in the late 1960s initiated the growth and spread of a population that now exceeds 25,000. Methods Periodic aerial surveys in the region provide a time series of spatially-explicit data to investigate factors influencing this successful and ongoing recovery. We integrated an ecological diffusion model that accounted for spatially-variable motility and density-dependent population growth, as well as multiple population epicenters, into a Bayesian hierarchical framework to help understand the factors influencing the success of this recovery. Results Our results indicated that sea otters exhibited higher residence time as well as greater equilibrium abundance in Glacier Bay, a protected area, and in areas where there is limited or no commercial fishing. Asymptotic spread rates suggested sea otters colonized Southeast Alaska at rates of 1–8 km/yr with lower rates occurring in areas correlated with higher residence time, which primarily included areas near shore and closed to commercial fishing. Further, we found that the intrinsic growth rate of sea otters may be higher than previous estimates suggested. Conclusions This study shows how predator recolonization can occur from multiple population epicenters. Additionally, our results suggest spatial heterogeneity in the physical environment as well as human activity and management can influence recolonization processes, both in terms of movement (or motility) and density dependence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document