Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness

Biodiversity metrics often integrate data on the presence and abundance of multiple species. Yet our understanding of how changes to the numbers of individuals, the evenness of species relative abundances, and the total number of species covary remains limited, both theoretically and empirically. Using individual-based rarefaction curves, we first show how expected positive relationships among changes in abundance, evenness and richness arise, and how they can break down. We then examined the interdependency between changes in abundance, evenness and richness more than 1100 assemblages sampled either through time or across space. As expected, richness changes were greatest when abundance and evenness changed in the same direction, whereas countervailing changes in abundance and evenness acted to constrain the magnitude of changes in species richness. Site-to-site variation in diversity was greater than rates of change through time. Moreover, changes in abundance, evenness, and richness were often spatially decoupled, and pairwise relationships between changes in these components were weak between sites. In contrast, changes in species richness and relative abundance were strongly correlated for assemblages sampled through time, meaning temporal changes in local biodiversity showed greater inertia and stronger relationships between the components changes when compared to site-to-site variation. Both temporal and spatial variation in local assemblage diversity were rarely attributable solely to changes in assemblage size sampling more or less of a static species abundance distribution. Instead, changing species relative abundances often dominate local variation in diversity. Moreover, how these altered patterns of relative abundance combine with changes to total abundance strongly determine the magnitude of richness changes. Interdependencies found here suggest looking beyond changes in abundance, evenness and richness as separate responses offering unique insights into diversity change can increase our understanding of biodiversity change.

Dominance structure of assemblages is regulated over a period of rapid environmental change

Ecological assemblages are inherently uneven, with numerically dominant species contributing disproportionately to ecosystem services. Marked biodiversity change due to growing pressures on the world's ecosystems is now well documented. However, the hypothesis that dominant species are becoming relatively more abundant has not been tested. We examined the prediction that the dominance structure of contemporary communities is shifting, using a meta-analysis of 110 assemblage timeseries. Changes in relative and absolute dominance were evaluated with mixed and cyclic-shift permutation models. Our analysis uncovered no evidence of a systematic change in either form of dominance, but established that relative dominance is preserved even when assemblage size (total N ) changes. This suggests that dominance structure is regulated alongside richness and assemblage size, and highlights the importance of investigating multiple components of assemblage diversity when evaluating ecosystem responses to environmental drivers.

Towards a morphological metric of assemblage dynamics in the fossil record: a test case using planktonic foraminifera

With a glance, even the novice naturalist can tell you something about the ecology of a given ecosystem. This is because the morphology of individuals reflects their evolutionary history and ecology, and imparts a distinct ‘look’ to communities—making it possible to immediately discern between deserts and forests, or coral reefs and abyssal plains. Once quantified, morphology can provide a common metric for characterizing communities across space and time and, if measured rapidly, serve as a powerful tool for quantifying biotic dynamics. Here, we present and test a new high-throughput approach for analysing community shape in the fossil record using semi-three-dimensional (3D) morphometrics from vertically stacked images (light microscopic or photogrammetric). We assess the potential informativeness of community morphology in a first analysis of the relationship between 3D morphology, ecology and phylogeny in 16 extant species of planktonic foraminifera—an abundant group in the marine fossil record—and in a preliminary comparison of four assemblages from the North Atlantic. In the species examined, phylogenetic relatedness was most closely correlated with ecology, with all three ecological traits examined (depth habitat, symbiont ecology and biogeography) showing significant phylogenetic signal. By contrast, morphological trees (based on 3D shape similarity) were relatively distantly related to both ecology and phylogeny. Although improvements are needed to realize the full utility of community morphometrics, our approach already provides robust volumetric measurements of assemblage size, a key ecological characteristic.

Parasitoids of medfly, Ceratitis capitata, and related tephritids in Kenyan coffee: a predominantly koinobiont assemblage

Arabica coffee was sampled from two sites in the central highlands of Kenya (Rurima, Ruiru) and one site on the western side of the Rift Valley (Koru). Three species of ceratitidine Tephritidae, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), C. rosaKarsch and Trirhithrum coffeae Bezzi, were reared from sites in the central highlands, and an additional species, C. anonae Graham, was recovered from the western-most site. Ten species of parasitic Hymenoptera were reared from these tephritids. The parasitoid assemblage was dominated by koinobionts. Eight of the species are koinobiont endoparasitoids, but only one idiobiont larval ectoparasitoid was reared, and only one idiobiont pupal endoparasitoid. The effects of sampling bias on determination of parasitoid assemblage size associated with concealed hosts are discussed. The potential for use of these parasitoids in biological control is also discussed. Most of the parasitoid species recovered during this study are capable of developing on C. capitata, while several also attack C. rosa. Both flies are notorious pests of tropical and subtropical fruits.

The Quantification Problem in Stone-Tool Assemblages

How many tools does a lithic assemblage contain? The question is not as banal as it may seem, because tools were used as wholes but many are found broken. Pottery and faunal analysts have grappled with the problems of counting original wholes from mixed sets of whole and broken objects; lithic analysts lag behind. Assemblage size can change greatly depending on whether we count or ignore tool fragments. To systematize treatment of broken tools, I apply Orton’s pottery quantification method to several lithic assemblages and compare it to Portnoy’s MNT and raw counts. Methods do not agree in all cases, demonstrating that how we count affects our results. Until we know more, both methods should be used to quantify lithic assemblages.

Parasitoid assemblage size and host ranges in a parasitoid (Hymenoptera)–agromyzid (Diptera) system from central Argentina

A parasitoid community on agromyzid leafminers from Cordoba, Argentina was analysed in terms of parasitoid assemblage size and host ranges of parasitoid species. Samples were taken during 1991–1995 at natural, urban and agricultural habitats. The system consisted of 69 parasitoid species and 51 leafminer species on 109 plant species. On average, 12 species parasitized each host, when only numerically well represented leafminer species were considered for analysis. Each parasitoid species exploited on average seven species and three genera of agromyzid leafminers. Both parasitoid assemblage size and parasitoid host range were notably high when compared with similar systems from other regions.