Towards a Restructured Theorization of Development and Adaptability for the Post-COVID-19 Era

It becomes progressively understood that the health crisis (and the deriving socioeconomic crisis) of COVID-19 drives the global system towards radical transformations. The successful adaptation of the various socioeconomic actors in this emerging reality probably constitutes the most significant challenge ahead. This chapter suggests a restructured theorization of socioeconomic development for the post-COVID-19 era, focused on the prerequisite organizational adaptation. This conceptual research examines fundamental evidence concerning current developments globally, arriving at a repositioning in evolutionary and interdisciplinary terms by adopting the strategy-technology-management synthesis to change management and innovation (Stra.Tech.Man).

The Technology Development and Management of Smart Manufacturing System: A Review On Theoretical and Technological Perspectives

This paper encompasses a state-of-the-art review on smart manufacturing system (SMS), focusing on theoretical relevance to technology development and technology management. The theoretical foundation of technology development has been reviewed based on the Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) theory and technology management has been focused on the basis of Technology Strategy Model (TSM) of Rieck and Dickson to shape the paper with theory of Management of Technology (MOT). A patent on SMS has been discussed to show how different technologies are integrated into this system. The characteristics of SMS have discussed the overall aspects of this future technological system. The the global textile complex has been depicted with a proposed SMS model of the apparel production unit. This study integrates the latest articles and technology on future manufacturing system perspectives, which gives a robust idea of mintegration have been identified as the major components of SMS. A brief model of SMS in the apparel production system demonstrated how SMS works in the industry level. The researchers on smart manufacturing can take away the above insights into their future research to take SMS research more forward.inimizing human interaction and maximizing the production efficiency in the manufacturing industry. The cyber-physical system, AI, ERP, digital twin, big data, additive manufacturing, cloud manufacturing, simulation, and vertical and horizontal

PRODUÇÃO ACADÊMICA SOBRE INOVAÇÃO FRUGAL: UMA ANÁLISE BIBLIOMÉTRICA EM PERIÓDICOS INTERNACIONAIS NA ÚLTIMA DÉCADA

Objetivo: Analisar a produção científica na área de Inovação Frugal (IF), nas bases de dados Web of Science e Scopus (CAPES, 2021). Metodologia: A pesquisa é caracterizada como descritiva com abordagem quantitativa e aplicação da técnica bibliométrica. Assim, após definir a técnica e tema, a busca foi realizada nas bases WoS e Scopus por tópico, utilizando os termos “frugal innovation”, com intervalo de tempo de 2010 a 2020, resultando em 306 publicações na WoS e 396 na Scopus. Em seguida, os dados foram organizados na Planilha Excel e após, as publicações foram identificadas nas seguintes categorias: evolução temporal, áreas temáticas, publicações por países, autores e frequência de citações. Por fim, utilizou-se o software VOSViewer para a criação de mapas textuais e clusters de co-citação. Resultados: Destaca-se que a temática de Inovação Frugal vem crescendo em frequência de publicações, destacando-se o ano de 2020. Dentre os resultados, a Índia e Estados Unidos encontram-se entre os primeiros que mais publicam e em nona posição encontra-se o Brasil encontra-se em nona posição. Quanto a area, Gestão, Negócios e Contabilidade tem a primeira posição. Entre os anos de 201 a 2020, somando entre as bases, tem-se o total de 5.281 citações. Originalidade/Valor: O uso da técnica de bibliometria apresenta-se como uma ferramenta relevante para a disseminação do conhecimento científico e tecnológico, possibilitando aos pesquisadores a análise quantitativa, descritiva e prognóstica de publicações realizadas em uma determinada área da ciência. Além disso, este estudo contribui com a disseminação do conhecimento sobre a inovação frugal, que é necessária para países que buscam o desenvolvimento econômico a partir da diminuição do uso de recursos e atendendo uma maior quantidade de pessoas, que antes não tinham acesso a determinados mercados e produtos. Palavra-chave: Inovação, Inovação Frugal, Bibliometria. Baptista, R., Escaria, V.& Madruga, P. (2008). Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small Business Economics, 30(1),49-58. Bhatti, Y. A. (2012). What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation. SSRN Electronic Journal, p. 1-45. Bouchery, Y.; Ghaffari, A.; Jemai, Z. & Fransoo, J. (2016). Sustainable transportation and order quantity: insights from multiobjective optimization. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 28 (3), 367-396. Crossan, M. M.; Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐ dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47 (6), 1154-1191. Drucker, P. F. (2016). Inovação e Espírito Empreendedor: (entrepreneurship): práticas e princípios. tradução de: Carlos J. Malferrari. São Paulo: Cengage Learning. Elia, G.; Margherita, A.& Petti, C. (2016). An operational model to develop technology entrepreneurship EGO-system, International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 13 (5),164-182. Hair, J.F.; Tatham, R. L.; Anderson, R. E.& Black, W. C. (1998). Análise multivariada de dados. Tradução Adonai Schlup Sant’Anna e Anselmo Chaves Neto. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman. Hossain, M.; Simula, H.& Halme, M. (2016) Can Frugal go global? Diffusion patterns of frugal innovations. Technology in Society, 46, 132-139. Jiménez, D. J.; Costa, M. M. & Valle, R. S. (2014). Knowledge management practices for innovation: a multinational corporation‘s perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18 (5), 905-918. Khan, R. (2016). How frugal innovation Promotes Social Sustainability. Sustainability, 8 (1034),1-29. Kunamaneni, S. (2019). Challenges in moving from incremental to radical low-cost innovation in emerging and transition countries: institutional perspectives based on rechargeable battery innovation in China and point-of-use water purification innovation in India. International Journal of Innovation Management, 23(03), 1-36. Leydesdorff, L.& Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195-203. Moustaghfir, K.& Schiuma, G. Knowledge, learning, and innovation: research and perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 495 – 510. Oliveira, J.& Moraes, K. (2016). Produção do conhecimento na universidade pública no brasil: tensões, tendências e desafios. Educação em Revista. Belo Horizonte, 32(4). Prabhu, J. (2017) Frugal innovation: doing more with less for more, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 375 (2095), 375. Quandt, C. O.; Bezerra, C. A. & Ferraresi, A. A. (2015). Dimensions of organizational innovativeness and its impact on innovation performance: proposition and evaluation of a model. Gestão & Produção, 22(4), 873-886. Prahalad, C. K.& Hart, S. L. (2008). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Estratégias e Negócios, Florianópolis, 1(2), 1-23. Radjou, N. & Prabhu, J. (2014). What frugal innovators do. Harvard Business Review, v. 10. Ramos‐Rodríguez, A. R & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981-1004. Rao, B. C. (2017). Advances in science and technology through frugality. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 45 (1), 32-38. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). A Teoria do Desenvolvimento Econômico: Uma Investigação sobre Lucros, Capital, Crédito, Juros e o Ciclo de Negócios, Transaction Publishers, Cambridge. Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. Abril Cultural. Simula, H.; Hossain, M. & Halme, M. (2015). Frugal and reverse innovations – Quo Vadis? Current Science, 109 (5), 1567-1572. Tiwari, R. & Herstatt, C. (2012). India-a lead market for frugal innovations? Extending the lead market theory to emerging economies. TIM/TUHH Working Paper, n. 67. Torres, T. Z.; Pierozzi, J. I.; Pereira, N. R. & CASTRO, A. de. Knowledge management and communication in Brazilian agricultural research: An integrated procedural approach. International Journal of Information Management. v. 31, p. 121-127. Weyrauch, T. & Herstatt, C. (2017). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2 (1). Zeschky, M.; Widenmayer, B. & Gassmann, O. (2011). Frugal Innovation in Emerging Markets. Research-Technology Management, 54(4), 38-45.

Analisis Tata Kelola Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian XYZ Menggunakan COBIT 2019

The Ministry of XYZ's Data and Information Center is a supporting element that is under and responsible to the Minister through the Secretary General with the task of preparing governance and information technology management infrastructure, developing, and implementing information system innovations and data management and information presentation. Information technology management is carried out to facilitate the management, monitoring and evaluation of every business process and information technology to achieve organizational goals. COBIT 2019 is used to assist organizations in managing and optimizing existing information technology by examining the 10 existing design factors and then analyzing the level of capability in each of the top three domains. The result of this research is the capability level of the domains BAI02, BAI03, and BAI07, which is then made recommendations from the domains that have gaps.