The impact of lymphadenectomy on lymph node recurrence after performing various treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundTreatment for regional lymph node recurrence after initial treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) differs among institutions. Though some retrospective cohort studies have shown that lymphadenectomy for cervical lymph node recurrence is safe and leads to long-term survival, the efficacy remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent lymphadenectomy for regional recurrence after treatment for ESCC.Patients and methodsWe retrieved 20 cases in which lymphadenectomy was performed for lymph node recurrence after initial treatment for ESCC in our hospital from January 2003 to December 2016. Initial treatments included esophagectomy, endoscopic resection (ER) and chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy (CRT/CT). Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after lymphadenectomy were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. We also used a univariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards model to determine factors influencing the long-term outcomes.ResultsThe 5-year OS and RFS of patients who underwent secondary lymphadenectomy for recurrence after initial treatment were 55.0% and 35.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates of patients who received esophagectomy, ER and CRT/CT as initial treatments, were 45.5%, 80.0% and 50.0%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates of patients with pStage I and pStage II-IVB lymph node recurrence were 75.0% and 41.7%, respectively.ConclusionsLymphadenectomy for regional recurrence after initial treatment for ESCC is effective to some degree. Patients with regional recurrence after initial treatment for Stage I ESCC have a good prognosis; thus, lymphadenectomy should be considered for these cases.

Survival and swallowing function outcome impact factors analysis of surgery-oriented comprehensive treatment for hypopharyngeal cancer in a series of 122 patients

Objective Under current standards of treating highly aggressive hypopharyngeal cancer (HPC), oncological control and functional outcome are still unsatisfactory worldwide. This study explored the surgery-oriented comprehensive treatment approach based on 15 years of practice. Methods A retrospective cohort of HPC patients treated by the senior author at Chinese PLA General Hospital between Nov 2005 and Aug 2012 and Capital Medical University Beijing Friendship Hospital between May 2014 and Nov 2019 was studied. Oncological control, swallowing function, and quality of life (QoL) were assessed. Results In total, 122 patients were included in this study, with 11 (9.0%) cases in the early stage and 111 (91.0%) cases in the advanced stage. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 40.0% and 36.1%, respectively. The swallowing outcome was satisfactory in 90 (73.8%) patients. Tracheostomy-free survival was achieved in 55 (45.1%) patients. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that the size of the surgical defect, local-regional recurrence, and distant metastasis were independent impact factors for OS and DFS ( P < .05). Multivariate analysis showed that the logistic regression coefficients (standard error) of pharyngo-cutaneous fistula and local-regional recurrence on swallowing function were 1.274 (.532) and 1.283 (.496), respectively ( P < .05). In addition, the logistic regression coefficients (standard error) of the clinical stage, local-regional recurrence, decannulation, and feeding tube on QoL were −7.803 (3.593), −7.699 (3.151), 13.853 (3.494), and −20.243 (3.696), respectively ( P < .05). Conclusions Surgery-oriented comprehensive treatment can give rise to good swallowing function without jeopardizing oncological control. The size of the surgical defect, local-regional recurrence, and distant metastasis were independent factors impacting OS and DFS. Pharyngo-cutaneous fistula and local-regional recurrence were independent factors impacting swallowing function. Clinical stage, local-regional recurrence, decannulation, and feeding tube were independent factors impacting QoL.

A New Risk Score Assessment for Neck Management in T1-T2N0 Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients: A European Head and Neck Cancer Center Survey Study and Evaluation of 58 Patients with Early Stage Sinonasal Carcinoma

Purpose The purpose of the present study was to assess whether European head and neck cancer centers perform elective neck dissection (END) in early stage sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and whether END affects oncological outcome. Methods A questionnaire regarding performance of END in T1 - T2 sinonasal SCCs was sent to 38 head and neck cancer centers in Europe. The results were further correlated and compared with clinical data of 58 patients with T1 (n = 37) and T2 (n = 21) sinonasal SCCs, a risk score and a nomogram were generated. Results Only 5–10 % of respondents are performing END in T1 and 26–32% in T2 sinonasal SCCs. In our cohort regional recurrence was evident in 10 (17.2%) patients, representing a significant worse prognostic factor for cancer specific survival (HR 8.13; p = 0.016). Particularly, regional recurrence was more frequent in T2 tumors and in patients where the primary tumor originated from nasal septum and vestibule. Based on our clinical and questionnaire data a new risk-score was determined to predict necessity for END. The risk-score, including T-classification and tumor site, assigned T1-classification with 0 points, followed by 1 point for T2; tumor site: nasal septum or vestibule with 1 point and tumors from other subsites with 0 points. Based on these factors we further created a nomogram for predicting the risk of regional recurrence. Patients with a high-risk score showed 9.52-fold higher risk for regional and or distant recurrence (HR 9.52; p = 0.002;) and their 5-year CSS was 44.4% compared to 92.8% in patients with moderate or low risk (p = 0.017). Conclusions Our proposed risk-score system in T1-2N0 sinonasal carcinoma is helpful to identify patients who may benefit from END. Although to date END has no value in European head and neck cancer centers for T1-T2 sinonasal SCCs, our study indicates that the neck management in these patients should be reconsidered.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus postoperative adjuvant XELOX chemotherapy versus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX regimen for local advanced gastric cancer-A randomized, controlled study

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) combined with postoperative adjuvant XELOX (Oxaliplatin +Capecitabine) chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) with XELOX for local advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Methods: In this prospectively randomized trial, we investigated the effect of NACRT combined with postoperative ACT for LAGC. 60 patients were randomly divided into NACRT group and ACT group, with 30 patients in each group. Patients in NACRT group were given three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (45 Gy/1.8 Gy/f) accompanied by synchronous XELOX of two cycles, followed by surgery, and then postoperative adjuvant XELOX chemotherapy of four cycles was performed. Patients in ACT group received surgery in advance, and then XELOX chemotherapy of six cycles was given. Results: The objective response rate of NACRT was 76.7%. The overall incidence of postoperative complications in NACRT group was not significantly different from that in ACT group (23.1% vs 30.0%, p = 0.560). The 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years progression-free survival (PFS）and overall survival (OS) in NACRT and ACT groups were 80.0% vs 56.7%, 73.3% vs 46.7%, 60.0% vs 33.3%, and 86.7% vs 80.0%, 76.7% vs 66.7%, 63.3% vs 50.0%, respectively. Patients in NACRT group showed a significantly higher R0 resection rate (84.6% vs 56.7%, p = 0.029),lower loco-regional recurrence rate (36.7% vs 11.5%, p = 0.039), longer PFS (p = 0.019) and freedom from locoregional progression(FFLP) (p = 0.004) than patients in ACT group, while there was no difference in OS (p = 0.215) and in toxicity incidence (p > 0.05). Conclusions: NACRT combined with postoperative adjuvant XELOX chemotherapy can improve R0 resection rate, reduce loco-regional recurrence, prolong PFS and FFLP without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications in patients with LAGC. Advances in knowledge: Compared with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, locally advanced gastric cancer patients may benefit from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and toxicity associated with chemoradiotherapy was tolerant and manageable.