quaternary quadratic form
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Kyoungmin Kim

Let [Formula: see text] be a positive definite (non-classic) integral quaternary quadratic form. We say [Formula: see text] is strongly[Formula: see text]-regular if it satisfies a strong regularity property on the number of representations of squares of integers. In this paper, we show that there are exactly [Formula: see text] strongly [Formula: see text]-regular diagonal quaternary quadratic forms representing [Formula: see text] (see Table [Formula: see text]). In particular, we use eta-quotients to prove the strong [Formula: see text]-regularity of the quaternary quadratic form [Formula: see text], which is, in fact, of class number [Formula: see text] (see Lemma 4.5 and Proposition 4.6).


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (05) ◽  
pp. 1219-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huafeng Liu ◽  
Liqun Hu

Let [Formula: see text] We obtain the asymptotic formula [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] are two constants. This improves the previous error term [Formula: see text] obtained by the second author [An asymptotic formula related to the divisors of the quaternary quadratic form, Acta Arith. 166 (2014) 129–140].


2008 ◽  
Vol 04 (05) ◽  
pp. 709-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBIN CHAPMAN

We give an elementary proof of the number of representations of an integer by the quaternary quadratic form x2 + xy + y2 + z2 + zt + t2.


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 687-691
Author(s):  
Guram Gogishvili

Abstract Let 𝑚 ∈ ℕ, 𝑓 be a positive definite, integral, primitive, quaternary quadratic form of the determinant 𝑑 and let ρ(𝑓,𝑚) be the corresponding singular series. When studying the best estimates for ρ(𝑓,𝑚) with respect to 𝑑 and 𝑚 we proved in [Gogishvili, Trudy Tbiliss. Univ. 346: 72–77, 2004] that where 𝑏(𝑘) is the product of distinct prime factors of 16𝑘 if 𝑘 ≠ 1 and 𝑏(𝑘) = 3 if 𝑘 = 1. The present paper proves a more precise estimate where 𝑑 = 𝑑0𝑑1, if 𝑝 > 2; 𝑕(2) ⩾ –4. The last estimate for ρ(𝑓,𝑚) as a general result for quaternary quadratic forms of the above-mentioned type is unimprovable in a certain sense.


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

In a previous paper [4] we showed that Γ3,1 = 16/. For the definition of Γr, s for an indefinite quadratic form in n = r + s variables of the type (r, s) see the above paper. Here we shall show that Γ2,2 = 16. More precisely we prove: Theorem. Let Q (x, y, z, t) be an indefinite quaternary quadratic form with determinant D > 0 and signature (2, 2). Then given any real numbers x0, y0, z0, t0 we can find integers x, y, z, t such thatEquality is necessary if and only if either where ρ ≠ 0. For Q1 equality occurs if and only if


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document