Predicting human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in men who have sex with men the influence of vaccine price and receiving an HPV diagnosis

Background To understand how human papillomavirus (HPV) screening results, HPV-related knowledge and attitudes are related to vaccination intention in three cost ranges and the actual vaccination behavior in a community sample of men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods MSM aged 20 years of age or older were recruited between October 2015 and May 2016 from community health centers that provide HIV testing and consultation services in Southern Taiwan and on social media. MSM were seen at baseline and again at 6 months after baseline in a cohort study. The baseline study included 253 individuals; 182 of them returned for the 6th-month follow-up. At each visit, MSM were asked to receive HPV screening and filled out a questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was used to test whether attitudinal factors and HPV screening results from the baseline affect their self-reported actual vaccine uptake at the in 6th-month follow-up. Results Our research included 171 participants from the cohort because they had full information of the study variables (mean ± SD age = 29.21 ± 6.18). Our model showed good model fit using indices such as the comparative fit index (value = 0.998) and root mean square error of approximation (value = 0.013). HPV knowledge can predict those who have intention to take up HPV vaccine no matter what the price (p = .02), and then predict vaccine uptake at the follow-up (p < .001). A positive HPV screening result can predict vaccine uptake at the follow-up (p = .004). Conclusion Our findings highlight the impact of vaccine price and HPV screening results on the intention and uptake of HPV vaccine. It is important to raise awareness of HPV in male populations. Clinicians and health educators should establish a safe and private environment for male patients for inquiring about HPV vaccine and HPV-related cancers.

Understanding HPV and cervical screening

Cervical cancer is preventable and curable. Sarah Butler and Yvonne Wilkinson explain how the cervical screening programme has changed from a cytology based test to HPV primary screening Screening for human papillomavirus is now the primary test for cervical screening in England, Wales and Scotland. Cervical screening for those individuals with a cervix routinely occurs every 3 years for those aged 25–49 (24½ in England) and every 5 years for those aged 50–64. Over 99.7% of cervical cancers are caused by human papillomavirus. Cervical cancer is preventable and curable; primary HPV screening can detect early changes in cervical cells allowing for effective monitoring and treatment.

Detection and Outcome of Endocervical Atypia in Cytology in Primary HPV Screening Programme

Most endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC) are associated with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection, with HPV genotypes 16, 18 and 45 accounting for >90% of the cases. Among endocervical glandular lesions, screening with hrHPV test has previously shown to predict the outcome better than cytology, although around one-fifth of the EAC remain negative both in hrHPV testing and cytology. The study consists of two consecutive HPV-primary screening rounds, conducted in 2012–2015 and 2017–2020. Of the 87 women aged 35 to 60 years of age diagnosed with Atypical endocervical cells, NOS or Atypical endocervical cells, favor neoplastic cytology during the first screening round, 63 (72.4%) were hrHPV positive and 24 (27.6%) were hrHPV negative. Among hrHPV positive patients, three EAC, two adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), one AIS + high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 13 HSIL were found. Of the histologically verified lesions, 68.4% (13/19) were purely of squamous origin. All the EAC and AIS were HPV16 or HPV 18 positive. No high-grade histological lesions were found among the hrHPV negative patients with cytological glandular atypia. A later database search revealed one HPV-negative, gastric-type mucinous EAC that was missed by the HPV primary screening.

Risk-stratification of HPV-positive women with low-grade cytology by FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation and HPV genotyping

Background The introduction of primary HPV screening has doubled the number of colposcopy referrals because of the direct referral of HPV-positive women with a borderline or mild dyskaryosis (BMD) cytology (ASC-US/LSIL) triage test. Further risk-stratification is warranted to improve the efficiency of HPV-based screening. Methods This study evaluated the discriminative power of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation, HPV16/18 genotyping and HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping in HPV-positive women with BMD (n = 294) in two Dutch screening trials. Absolute CIN3+ risks and colposcopy referrals within one screening round were calculated. Results Methylation analysis discriminated well, yielding a CIN3+ risk of 33.1% after a positive result and a CIN3+ risk of 9.8% after a negative result. HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping resulted in a 27.6% and 24.6% CIN3+ risk after a positive result, and a 13.2% and 9.1% CIN3+ risk after a negative result. Colposcopy referral percentages were 41.2%, 43.2%, and 66.3% for FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation, HPV16/18 and HPV16/18/31/33/45 genotyping, respectively. The CIN3+ risk after a negative result could be lowered to 2.8% by combining methylation and extended genotyping, at the expense of a higher referral percentage of 75.5%. Conclusion The use of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation and/or HPV genotyping in HPV-positive women with BMD can lead to a substantial reduction in the number of direct colposcopy referrals.

Psychological Distress of Testing Positive for Human Papillomavirus at Routine Prenatal Visits: A Prospective Observational Study among Chinese Pregnant Women with Normal Cytology

Background To explore the psychological impact of the positive HPV result on pregnant women with normal cytology. Methods The psychological distress level of HPV-positive women was compared with those of HPV-negative women before the results were notified. After the notification, the distress level of women in the HPV-positive group was assessed for the 2nd time and 3rd time before colposcopy and 2 weeks post-colposcopy. The lifestyle characteristics, knowledge of cervical cancer and screening behavior were compared between groups. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between socio-demographic, lifestyle, knowledge and risk of elevated distress level. Results No statistical difference of the distress level (as measured by PHQ-9 and GAD-7) was found between HPV-positive and -negative women. Within HPV-positive group, low distress level remained through all three time-points, regardless of HPV subtypes or colposcopy diagnoses. Half of the participants were suboptimally screened before this study conducted; 7.6% were aware of the causal relationship between HPV and cervical cancer. Post-graduate degree was associated with elevated PHQ-9 score. Conclusions HPV screening was unlikely to cause additional psychological distress among pregnant population in China.