group cohomology
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

210
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-84
Author(s):  
M. Lanini ◽  
K. Zainoulline

The present paper is devoted to twisted foldings of root systems that generalize the involutive foldings corresponding to automorphisms of Dynkin diagrams. A motivating example is Lusztig’s projection of the root system of type E 8 E_8 onto the subring of icosians of the quaternion algebra, which gives the root system of type H 4 H_4 . By using moment graph techniques for any such folding, a map at the equivariant cohomology level is constructed. It is shown that this map commutes with characteristic classes and Borel maps. Restrictions of this map to the usual cohomology of projective homogeneous varieties, to group cohomology and to their virtual analogues for finite reflection groups are also introduced and studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol 359 (8) ◽  
pp. 925-937
Author(s):  
Constantin-Cosmin Todea
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 207 (2) ◽  
pp. 594-603
Author(s):  
B. S. Bychkov ◽  
A. A. Kazakov ◽  
D. V. Talalaev

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Howe

Abstract We construct a $(\mathfrak {gl}_2, B(\mathbb {Q}_p))$ and Hecke-equivariant cup product pairing between overconvergent modular forms and the local cohomology at $0$ of a sheaf on $\mathbb {P}^1$ , landing in the compactly supported completed $\mathbb {C}_p$ -cohomology of the modular curve. The local cohomology group is a highest-weight Verma module, and the cup product is non-trivial on a highest-weight vector for any overconvergent modular form of infinitesimal weight not equal to $1$ . For classical weight $k\geq 2$ , the Verma has an algebraic quotient $H^1(\mathbb {P}^1, \mathcal {O}(-k))$ , and on classical forms, the pairing factors through this quotient, giving a geometric description of ‘half’ of the locally algebraic vectors in completed cohomology; the other half is described by a pairing with the roles of $H^1$ and $H^0$ reversed between the modular curve and $\mathbb {P}^1$ . Under minor assumptions, we deduce a conjecture of Gouvea on the Hodge-Tate-Sen weights of Galois representations attached to overconvergent modular forms. Our main results are essentially a strict subset of those obtained independently by Lue Pan, but the perspective here is different, and the proofs are short and use simple tools: a Mayer-Vietoris cover, a cup product, and a boundary map in group cohomology.


Author(s):  
Mariam Almahdi Mohammed Mull'a ◽  
Amal Mohammed Ahmed Gaweash ◽  
Hayat Yousuf Ismail Bakur

Arithmetic subgroups are an important source of discrete groups acting freely on manifolds. We need to know that there exist many torsion-free 푺푺L(ퟐퟐ,ℝ) is an “arithmetic” subgroup of 푺푺L(ퟐퟐ,ℝ). The other arithmetic subgroups are not as obvious, but they can be constructed by using quaternion algebras. Replacing the quaternion algebras with larger division algebras yields many arithmetic subgroups of 푺푺L(풏풏,ℝ), with 풏풏>2. In fact, a calculation of group cohomology shows that the only other way to construct arithmetic subgroups of 푺푺L(풏풏, ℝ) is by using arithmetic groups. In this paper justifies Commensurable groups, and some definitions and examples,ℝ-forms of classical simple groups over ℂ, calculating the complexification of each classical group, Applications to manifolds. Let us start with 푺푺푺푺(푛푛,ℂ). This is already a complex Lie group, but we can think of it as a real Lie group of twice the dimension. As such, it has a complexification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-31
Author(s):  
Nicolaus Heuer

Bounded cohomology of groups was first studied by Gromov in 1982 in his seminal paper M. Gromov, Volume and bounded cohomology, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1982), no. 56, 5–99. Since then it has sparked much research in Geometric Group Theory. However, it is notoriously hard to explicitly compute bounded cohomology, even for most basic “non-positively curved” groups. On the other hand, there is a well-known interpretation of ordinary group cohomology in dimension $2$ and $3$ in terms of group extensions. The aim of this paper is to make this interpretation available for bounded group cohomology. This will involve quasihomomorphisms as defined and studied by K. Fujiwara and M. Kapovich, On quasihomomorphisms with noncommutative targets, Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), no. 2, 478–519.


2020 ◽  
Vol 546 ◽  
pp. 604-640
Author(s):  
Mikhailo Dokuchaev ◽  
Mykola Khrypchenko ◽  
Juan Jacobo Simón
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohei Kobayashi ◽  
Kantaro Ohmori ◽  
Yuji Tachikawa
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document