ABSTRACTThe prediction of inter-individual behavioural differences from neuroimaging data is a rapidly evolving field of research, focusing on individualised methods to describe human brain organisation on the single-subject level. One method that harnesses such individual signatures is functional connectome fingerprinting, which can reliably identify individuals from large study populations. While connectome fingerprints have been previously associated with individual cognitive function, these associations rest on indirect evidence.Contrasting with these previous reports, here we systematically investigate the link between connectome fingerprints and the prediction of behaviour on different levels of brain network organisation (individual edges, network interactions, topographical organisation, and edge variability), using 339 resting-state fMRI datasets from the Human Connectome Project.Our analysis revealed a significant divergence between connectivity signatures that discriminate between individuals and those predictive of behaviour on all levels of network organisation. Across different parcellation schemes, thresholds and prediction algorithms, we consistently find fingerprints in higher-order multimodal association cortices, while neural correlates of behaviour display a more variable topological distribution. Furthermore, we find the standard deviation of connections between subjects to be significantly higher in fingerprinting than in prediction, making inter-individual connection variability a possible separating marker.These results demonstrate that participant identification and behavioural prediction involve highly distinct functional systems of the human connectome, suggesting that connectome fingerprints are not as functionally relevant as previously believed. The present study thus calls for a re-evaluation of the significance of functional connectivity fingerprints in personalized medicine.