Surface Protein Expression in Group B Streptococcal Invasive Isolates

Author(s):  
Patricia Ferrieri ◽  
Aurea E. Flores
Lab on a Chip ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 1349-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda Jack ◽  
Khadijah Hussain ◽  
Danika Rodrigues ◽  
Mina Zeinali ◽  
Ebrahim Azizi ◽  
...  

In light of the significance of tumor cell heterogeneity, we describe a facile workflow to isolate distinct groups of tumor cells immunomagnetically, according to their surface-protein expression levels.


Luminescence ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roope J. Huttunen ◽  
Tomás C. O'Riordan ◽  
Pirkko L. Härkönen ◽  
Juhani T. Soini ◽  
Niko J. Meltola ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1080-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan Fitzpatrick ◽  
Sterling McBride ◽  
Jonathan Yavelow ◽  
Saltanat Najmi ◽  
Peter Zanzucchi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The analysis of single cells obtained from needle aspirates of tumors is constrained by the need for processing. To this end, we investigated two microfluidic approaches to measure the expression of surface proteins in single cancer cells or in small populations (<50 cells). Methods: One approach involved indirect fluorescence labeling of cell-surface proteins and channeling of cells in a microfluidic device past a fluorescence detector for signal quantification and analysis. A second approach channeled cells in a microfluidic device over detection zones coated with ligands to surface proteins and measured rates of passage and of retardation based on transient interactions between surface proteins and ligands. Results: The fluorescence device detected expression of integrin α5 induced by basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) treatment in MCF-7 cells and that of Her-2/neu in SK-BR-3 cells compared with controls. Experiments measuring passage retardation showed significant differences in passage rates between FGF-2–treated and untreated MCF-7 cells over reaction regions coated with fibronectin and antibody to integrin α5β1 compared with control regions. Blocking peptides reversed the retardation, demonstrating specificity. Conclusions: Immunofluorescence detection in a microfluidic channel demonstrates the potential for assaying surface protein expression in a few individual cells and will permit the development of future iterations not requiring cell handling. The flow retardation device represents the first application of this technology for assessing cell-surface protein expression in cancer cells and may provide a way for analyzing expression profiles of single cells without preanalytical manipulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document