‘Showing’ as a Means of Engaging a Reluctant Participant into a Joint Activity

Author(s):  
Cornelia Gerhardt
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Ludovica Brusaferri ◽  
Elise C. Emond ◽  
Alexandre Bousse ◽  
Robert Twyman ◽  
Alexander C. Whitehead ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Shirin Vossoughi ◽  
Natalie R. Davis ◽  
Ava Jackson ◽  
Ruben Echevarria ◽  
Arturo Muñoz ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey M. Bradshaw ◽  
Paul J. Feltovich ◽  
Catholijn M. Jonker ◽  
M. Birna Van Riemsdijk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 60 (11) ◽  
pp. 1649-1655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmadreza Rezaei ◽  
Georg Schramm ◽  
Stefanie M.A. Willekens ◽  
Gaspar Delso ◽  
Koen Van Laere ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-421
Author(s):  
Ludovica Brusaferri ◽  
Alexandre Bousse ◽  
Elise C. Emond ◽  
Richard Brown ◽  
Yu-Jung Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anooradha Iyer Siddiqi

Architecture Culture, Humanitarian Expertise: From the Tropics to Shelter, 1953–93 recovers a history of architecture and humanitarianism through an examination of institutions and the development of a subfield of professional practice. Charting mutual interest between major humanitarian agencies and the architecture and planning professions, Anooradha Iyer Siddiqi maps the joint construction of expertise, tying together three sets of concerns: preoccupations with the tropics and climate as anchor points for the science and rationalization behind building design, the institutionalization of humanitarian spatial expertise in the academy and industry, and a tension between models for development and for relief. This joint activity and its discursive themes, from the “tropics” to “shelter”—whether aggrandizing or instrumentalizing the shared mission of architecture and humanitarianism—raised the stakes for architectural expertise as a driver for practice as well as history.


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Holthoff ◽  
Lotte Junker Harbo

“Now I can actually play soccer with the young people without fearing that my colleagues think I am escaping the paper work.”These were the words from a participant in a social pedagogy training course in England a few years ago. This understanding emerged through in-depth discussions and activities around key social pedagogical concepts, such as the ‘common third’, the ‘3Ps’, the ‘zone of proximal development’ and the ‘learning zone model’. In this article we will explore how a joint activity, for example, playing soccer, can be seen as a pedagogical activity and with what intentions it is undertaken to make it pedagogically purposeful.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document